Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal-contaminated soil/sediment

Season S. Chen, Jessica S. Taylor, Kitae Baek, Eakalak Khan, Daniel C.W. Tsang, Yong Sik Ok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multi-criteria analysis and detailed impact analysis were carried out to assess the sustainability of four remedial alternatives for metal-contaminated soil/sediment at former timber treatment sites and harbour sediment with different scales. The sustainability was evaluated in the aspects of human health and safety, environment, stakeholder concern, and land use, under four different scenarios with varying weighting factors. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed to reveal the likelihood of accomplishing sustainable remediation with different treatment options at different sites. The results showed that in-situ remedial technologies were more sustainable than ex-situ ones, where in-situ containment demonstrated both the most sustainable result and the highest probability to achieve sustainability amongst the four remedial alternatives in this study, reflecting the lesser extent of off-site and on-site impacts. Concerns associated with ex-situ options were adverse impacts tied to all four aspects and caused by excavation, extraction, and off-site disposal. The results of this study suggested the importance of considering the uncertainties resulting from the remedial options (i.e., stochastic analysis) in addition to the overall sustainability scores (i.e., deterministic analysis). The developed framework and model simulation could serve as an assessment for the sustainability likelihood of remedial options to ensure sustainable remediation of contaminated sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-427
Number of pages7
JournalChemosphere
Volume174
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Remediation
Sustainable development
Sediments
remediation
Metals
sustainability
Soils
metal
sediment
Timber
Ports and harbors
health and safety
containment
Excavation
Land use
simulation
timber
excavation
harbor
stakeholder

Keywords

  • Contaminated soil
  • Heavy metals
  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • Multi-criteria analysis
  • Soil stabilization
  • Sustainable remediation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal-contaminated soil/sediment. / Chen, Season S.; Taylor, Jessica S.; Baek, Kitae; Khan, Eakalak; Tsang, Daniel C.W.; Ok, Yong Sik.

In: Chemosphere, Vol. 174, 01.01.2017, p. 421-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Season S. ; Taylor, Jessica S. ; Baek, Kitae ; Khan, Eakalak ; Tsang, Daniel C.W. ; Ok, Yong Sik. / Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal-contaminated soil/sediment. In: Chemosphere. 2017 ; Vol. 174. pp. 421-427.
@article{294f57642b554ecfba1d03e66a77122a,
title = "Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal-contaminated soil/sediment",
abstract = "Multi-criteria analysis and detailed impact analysis were carried out to assess the sustainability of four remedial alternatives for metal-contaminated soil/sediment at former timber treatment sites and harbour sediment with different scales. The sustainability was evaluated in the aspects of human health and safety, environment, stakeholder concern, and land use, under four different scenarios with varying weighting factors. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed to reveal the likelihood of accomplishing sustainable remediation with different treatment options at different sites. The results showed that in-situ remedial technologies were more sustainable than ex-situ ones, where in-situ containment demonstrated both the most sustainable result and the highest probability to achieve sustainability amongst the four remedial alternatives in this study, reflecting the lesser extent of off-site and on-site impacts. Concerns associated with ex-situ options were adverse impacts tied to all four aspects and caused by excavation, extraction, and off-site disposal. The results of this study suggested the importance of considering the uncertainties resulting from the remedial options (i.e., stochastic analysis) in addition to the overall sustainability scores (i.e., deterministic analysis). The developed framework and model simulation could serve as an assessment for the sustainability likelihood of remedial options to ensure sustainable remediation of contaminated sites.",
keywords = "Contaminated soil, Heavy metals, Monte Carlo simulation, Multi-criteria analysis, Soil stabilization, Sustainable remediation",
author = "Chen, {Season S.} and Taylor, {Jessica S.} and Kitae Baek and Eakalak Khan and Tsang, {Daniel C.W.} and Ok, {Yong Sik}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "421--427",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal-contaminated soil/sediment

AU - Chen, Season S.

AU - Taylor, Jessica S.

AU - Baek, Kitae

AU - Khan, Eakalak

AU - Tsang, Daniel C.W.

AU - Ok, Yong Sik

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Multi-criteria analysis and detailed impact analysis were carried out to assess the sustainability of four remedial alternatives for metal-contaminated soil/sediment at former timber treatment sites and harbour sediment with different scales. The sustainability was evaluated in the aspects of human health and safety, environment, stakeholder concern, and land use, under four different scenarios with varying weighting factors. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed to reveal the likelihood of accomplishing sustainable remediation with different treatment options at different sites. The results showed that in-situ remedial technologies were more sustainable than ex-situ ones, where in-situ containment demonstrated both the most sustainable result and the highest probability to achieve sustainability amongst the four remedial alternatives in this study, reflecting the lesser extent of off-site and on-site impacts. Concerns associated with ex-situ options were adverse impacts tied to all four aspects and caused by excavation, extraction, and off-site disposal. The results of this study suggested the importance of considering the uncertainties resulting from the remedial options (i.e., stochastic analysis) in addition to the overall sustainability scores (i.e., deterministic analysis). The developed framework and model simulation could serve as an assessment for the sustainability likelihood of remedial options to ensure sustainable remediation of contaminated sites.

AB - Multi-criteria analysis and detailed impact analysis were carried out to assess the sustainability of four remedial alternatives for metal-contaminated soil/sediment at former timber treatment sites and harbour sediment with different scales. The sustainability was evaluated in the aspects of human health and safety, environment, stakeholder concern, and land use, under four different scenarios with varying weighting factors. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed to reveal the likelihood of accomplishing sustainable remediation with different treatment options at different sites. The results showed that in-situ remedial technologies were more sustainable than ex-situ ones, where in-situ containment demonstrated both the most sustainable result and the highest probability to achieve sustainability amongst the four remedial alternatives in this study, reflecting the lesser extent of off-site and on-site impacts. Concerns associated with ex-situ options were adverse impacts tied to all four aspects and caused by excavation, extraction, and off-site disposal. The results of this study suggested the importance of considering the uncertainties resulting from the remedial options (i.e., stochastic analysis) in addition to the overall sustainability scores (i.e., deterministic analysis). The developed framework and model simulation could serve as an assessment for the sustainability likelihood of remedial options to ensure sustainable remediation of contaminated sites.

KW - Contaminated soil

KW - Heavy metals

KW - Monte Carlo simulation

KW - Multi-criteria analysis

KW - Soil stabilization

KW - Sustainable remediation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011923764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011923764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 28187388

AN - SCOPUS:85011923764

VL - 174

SP - 421

EP - 427

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

ER -