Sustainable monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type and image resolution

Samuel Park, Hemin Lee, Jinhyung Chon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles can collect high-resolution and real-time photos while emitting fewer greenhouse gases than ordinary airplanes and therefore are considered economic and environmentally friendly platforms. However, quantitative analyses of the sustainability of using unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial photography based on their performance and technical constraints compared to that of airplanes are lacking. The purpose of this study is to analyze the economically and environmentally appropriate monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type (such as fixed-wing and rotary-wing types) and desired image resolution (such as 5 cm/pix and 20 cm/pix for the ground sample distance). To determine the sustainable monitoring coverage, the total photogrammetry costs must include the social cost to reduce the emitted greenhouse gases during operation, resulting in a feedback relation. As a result, the sustainable monitoring coverage of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles should be less than 27.50 km2 when the resolution is 5 cm/pix and 30.64 km2 when the resolution is 20 cm/pix. Rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles are sustainable when their monitoring coverage is less than 23.98 km2 at a resolution of 5 cm/pix and 26.75 km2 at a resolution of 20 cm/pix. These results provide information on the number of unmanned aerial vehicles and the standing unmanned aerial vehicle deployment plans required to monitor the survey area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-348
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume247
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Photogrammetry
Aircraft
Image resolution
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)
Gases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Monitoring
Photography
Economics
Fixed wings
Greenhouse gases
Aerial photography
Optical resolving power
Costs
Sustainable development
Feedback

Keywords

  • Aerial photography resolution
  • Optimal coverage
  • Social cost
  • Sustainable monitoring
  • UAV wing type

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Sustainable monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type and image resolution. / Park, Samuel; Lee, Hemin; Chon, Jinhyung.

In: Environmental Pollution, Vol. 247, 01.04.2019, p. 340-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fadddd1168624bb08f4bf2d8a693e09b,
title = "Sustainable monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type and image resolution",
abstract = "Unmanned aerial vehicles can collect high-resolution and real-time photos while emitting fewer greenhouse gases than ordinary airplanes and therefore are considered economic and environmentally friendly platforms. However, quantitative analyses of the sustainability of using unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial photography based on their performance and technical constraints compared to that of airplanes are lacking. The purpose of this study is to analyze the economically and environmentally appropriate monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type (such as fixed-wing and rotary-wing types) and desired image resolution (such as 5 cm/pix and 20 cm/pix for the ground sample distance). To determine the sustainable monitoring coverage, the total photogrammetry costs must include the social cost to reduce the emitted greenhouse gases during operation, resulting in a feedback relation. As a result, the sustainable monitoring coverage of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles should be less than 27.50 km2 when the resolution is 5 cm/pix and 30.64 km2 when the resolution is 20 cm/pix. Rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles are sustainable when their monitoring coverage is less than 23.98 km2 at a resolution of 5 cm/pix and 26.75 km2 at a resolution of 20 cm/pix. These results provide information on the number of unmanned aerial vehicles and the standing unmanned aerial vehicle deployment plans required to monitor the survey area.",
keywords = "Aerial photography resolution, Optimal coverage, Social cost, Sustainable monitoring, UAV wing type",
author = "Samuel Park and Hemin Lee and Jinhyung Chon",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.050",
language = "English",
volume = "247",
pages = "340--348",
journal = "Environmental Pollution",
issn = "0269-7491",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type and image resolution

AU - Park, Samuel

AU - Lee, Hemin

AU - Chon, Jinhyung

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Unmanned aerial vehicles can collect high-resolution and real-time photos while emitting fewer greenhouse gases than ordinary airplanes and therefore are considered economic and environmentally friendly platforms. However, quantitative analyses of the sustainability of using unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial photography based on their performance and technical constraints compared to that of airplanes are lacking. The purpose of this study is to analyze the economically and environmentally appropriate monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type (such as fixed-wing and rotary-wing types) and desired image resolution (such as 5 cm/pix and 20 cm/pix for the ground sample distance). To determine the sustainable monitoring coverage, the total photogrammetry costs must include the social cost to reduce the emitted greenhouse gases during operation, resulting in a feedback relation. As a result, the sustainable monitoring coverage of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles should be less than 27.50 km2 when the resolution is 5 cm/pix and 30.64 km2 when the resolution is 20 cm/pix. Rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles are sustainable when their monitoring coverage is less than 23.98 km2 at a resolution of 5 cm/pix and 26.75 km2 at a resolution of 20 cm/pix. These results provide information on the number of unmanned aerial vehicles and the standing unmanned aerial vehicle deployment plans required to monitor the survey area.

AB - Unmanned aerial vehicles can collect high-resolution and real-time photos while emitting fewer greenhouse gases than ordinary airplanes and therefore are considered economic and environmentally friendly platforms. However, quantitative analyses of the sustainability of using unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial photography based on their performance and technical constraints compared to that of airplanes are lacking. The purpose of this study is to analyze the economically and environmentally appropriate monitoring coverage of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry according to wing type (such as fixed-wing and rotary-wing types) and desired image resolution (such as 5 cm/pix and 20 cm/pix for the ground sample distance). To determine the sustainable monitoring coverage, the total photogrammetry costs must include the social cost to reduce the emitted greenhouse gases during operation, resulting in a feedback relation. As a result, the sustainable monitoring coverage of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles should be less than 27.50 km2 when the resolution is 5 cm/pix and 30.64 km2 when the resolution is 20 cm/pix. Rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles are sustainable when their monitoring coverage is less than 23.98 km2 at a resolution of 5 cm/pix and 26.75 km2 at a resolution of 20 cm/pix. These results provide information on the number of unmanned aerial vehicles and the standing unmanned aerial vehicle deployment plans required to monitor the survey area.

KW - Aerial photography resolution

KW - Optimal coverage

KW - Social cost

KW - Sustainable monitoring

KW - UAV wing type

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060499368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060499368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.050

DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.050

M3 - Article

C2 - 30690230

AN - SCOPUS:85060499368

VL - 247

SP - 340

EP - 348

JO - Environmental Pollution

JF - Environmental Pollution

SN - 0269-7491

ER -