Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating

Ji Hoon Bae, Jong-Keon Oh, Chang Wug Oh, Chang Ryong Hur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: As there are few reports on the difficulties of removing the locking compression plate (LCP), we prospectively investigated the incidence and difficulties in 58 patients in whom various types of LCPs were taken. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2007, we have removed 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws and 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws. All of the operations were performed by experienced trauma surgeons. All of the screws were inserted with the use of torque limiting attachment according to the manufacturers recommendation. During the same period of time we have removed 198 AO-3.5 cortical and 4.0 cancellous screws from various sites. Results: All of 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws were removed without difficulties. A total of 24 out of 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws were removed with many difficulties due to the stripping of the hexagonal recess. The use of conical extraction screw which was developed especially for the removal of stripped locking screws was successful in only six screws. We have removed plates by cutting the plate with metal cutting saw. We describe useful technical trick to remove the plate when there is only one screw left stripped. Compared to the locking screws, only one of 198 3.5-cortical screws was stripped. Conclusion: Care should be taken at the time of removal of the locking compression plate, especially for the 3.5-locking screws.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-95
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Torque
Metals
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Locking compression plate
  • Locking screw
  • Removal
  • Stripping
  • Technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating. / Bae, Ji Hoon; Oh, Jong-Keon; Oh, Chang Wug; Hur, Chang Ryong.

In: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 129, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 91-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b13e14f92864720bdb2085eb7575c6e,
title = "Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating",
abstract = "Introduction: As there are few reports on the difficulties of removing the locking compression plate (LCP), we prospectively investigated the incidence and difficulties in 58 patients in whom various types of LCPs were taken. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2007, we have removed 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws and 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws. All of the operations were performed by experienced trauma surgeons. All of the screws were inserted with the use of torque limiting attachment according to the manufacturers recommendation. During the same period of time we have removed 198 AO-3.5 cortical and 4.0 cancellous screws from various sites. Results: All of 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws were removed without difficulties. A total of 24 out of 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws were removed with many difficulties due to the stripping of the hexagonal recess. The use of conical extraction screw which was developed especially for the removal of stripped locking screws was successful in only six screws. We have removed plates by cutting the plate with metal cutting saw. We describe useful technical trick to remove the plate when there is only one screw left stripped. Compared to the locking screws, only one of 198 3.5-cortical screws was stripped. Conclusion: Care should be taken at the time of removal of the locking compression plate, especially for the 3.5-locking screws.",
keywords = "Locking compression plate, Locking screw, Removal, Stripping, Technique",
author = "Bae, {Ji Hoon} and Jong-Keon Oh and Oh, {Chang Wug} and Hur, {Chang Ryong}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00402-008-0769-5",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "91--95",
journal = "Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie",
issn = "0003-9330",
publisher = "J.F. Bergmann",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating

AU - Bae, Ji Hoon

AU - Oh, Jong-Keon

AU - Oh, Chang Wug

AU - Hur, Chang Ryong

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Introduction: As there are few reports on the difficulties of removing the locking compression plate (LCP), we prospectively investigated the incidence and difficulties in 58 patients in whom various types of LCPs were taken. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2007, we have removed 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws and 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws. All of the operations were performed by experienced trauma surgeons. All of the screws were inserted with the use of torque limiting attachment according to the manufacturers recommendation. During the same period of time we have removed 198 AO-3.5 cortical and 4.0 cancellous screws from various sites. Results: All of 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws were removed without difficulties. A total of 24 out of 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws were removed with many difficulties due to the stripping of the hexagonal recess. The use of conical extraction screw which was developed especially for the removal of stripped locking screws was successful in only six screws. We have removed plates by cutting the plate with metal cutting saw. We describe useful technical trick to remove the plate when there is only one screw left stripped. Compared to the locking screws, only one of 198 3.5-cortical screws was stripped. Conclusion: Care should be taken at the time of removal of the locking compression plate, especially for the 3.5-locking screws.

AB - Introduction: As there are few reports on the difficulties of removing the locking compression plate (LCP), we prospectively investigated the incidence and difficulties in 58 patients in whom various types of LCPs were taken. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2007, we have removed 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws and 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws. All of the operations were performed by experienced trauma surgeons. All of the screws were inserted with the use of torque limiting attachment according to the manufacturers recommendation. During the same period of time we have removed 198 AO-3.5 cortical and 4.0 cancellous screws from various sites. Results: All of 159 5.0-self tapping locking screws were removed without difficulties. A total of 24 out of 279 3.5- self tapping locking screws were removed with many difficulties due to the stripping of the hexagonal recess. The use of conical extraction screw which was developed especially for the removal of stripped locking screws was successful in only six screws. We have removed plates by cutting the plate with metal cutting saw. We describe useful technical trick to remove the plate when there is only one screw left stripped. Compared to the locking screws, only one of 198 3.5-cortical screws was stripped. Conclusion: Care should be taken at the time of removal of the locking compression plate, especially for the 3.5-locking screws.

KW - Locking compression plate

KW - Locking screw

KW - Removal

KW - Stripping

KW - Technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56249085217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56249085217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00402-008-0769-5

DO - 10.1007/s00402-008-0769-5

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 91

EP - 95

JO - Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie

JF - Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie

SN - 0003-9330

IS - 1

ER -