TY - JOUR
T1 - Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy in patients with entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with multiple drug failure
T2 - Results of a randomised trial
AU - Lim, Young Suk
AU - Byun, Kwan Soo
AU - Yoo, Byung Chul
AU - Kwon, So Young
AU - Kim, Yoon Jun
AU - An, Jihyun
AU - Lee, Han Chu
AU - Lee, Yung Sang
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Objective: Little clinical data are available regarding the optimal treatment of patients who harbour entecavir (ETV)-resistant HBV. Design: In this multicentre randomised trial, patients who had HBV with ETV resistance-associated mutations and serum HBV DNA concentrations >60 IU/mL were randomised to receive tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, 300 mg/day) monotherapy (n=45) or TDF and ETV (1 mg/day) combination therapy (n=45) for 48 weeks. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, including HBV DNA levels (median, 4.02 log10 IU/mL) and hepatitis B e antigen-positivity (89%). All patients had at least one ETV-resistance mutation: rtT184A/C/F/G/I/L/S (n=49), rtS202G (n=43) and rtM250L/V (n=7), in addition to rtM204V/I (n=90). All except one patient in the TDF group completed 48 weeks of treatment. At week 48, the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <15 IU/mL, the primary efficacy endpoint, was not significantly different between the TDF and TDF+ETV groups (71% vs 73%; p>0.99). The mean change in HBV DNA levels from baseline was not significantly different between groups (-3.66 vs-3.74 log10 IU/mL; p=0.81). Virological breakthrough occurred in one patient on TDF, which was attributed to poor drug adherence. At week 48, six and three patients in the TDF and TDF+ETV groups, respectively, retained their baseline resistance mutations (p>0.99). None developed additional resistance mutations. Safety profiles were comparable in the two groups. Conclusions: TDF monotherapy for 48 weeks provided a virological response comparable to that of TDF and ETV combination therapy in patients infected with ETV-resistant HBV. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01639092.
AB - Objective: Little clinical data are available regarding the optimal treatment of patients who harbour entecavir (ETV)-resistant HBV. Design: In this multicentre randomised trial, patients who had HBV with ETV resistance-associated mutations and serum HBV DNA concentrations >60 IU/mL were randomised to receive tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, 300 mg/day) monotherapy (n=45) or TDF and ETV (1 mg/day) combination therapy (n=45) for 48 weeks. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, including HBV DNA levels (median, 4.02 log10 IU/mL) and hepatitis B e antigen-positivity (89%). All patients had at least one ETV-resistance mutation: rtT184A/C/F/G/I/L/S (n=49), rtS202G (n=43) and rtM250L/V (n=7), in addition to rtM204V/I (n=90). All except one patient in the TDF group completed 48 weeks of treatment. At week 48, the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <15 IU/mL, the primary efficacy endpoint, was not significantly different between the TDF and TDF+ETV groups (71% vs 73%; p>0.99). The mean change in HBV DNA levels from baseline was not significantly different between groups (-3.66 vs-3.74 log10 IU/mL; p=0.81). Virological breakthrough occurred in one patient on TDF, which was attributed to poor drug adherence. At week 48, six and three patients in the TDF and TDF+ETV groups, respectively, retained their baseline resistance mutations (p>0.99). None developed additional resistance mutations. Safety profiles were comparable in the two groups. Conclusions: TDF monotherapy for 48 weeks provided a virological response comparable to that of TDF and ETV combination therapy in patients infected with ETV-resistant HBV. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01639092.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929929100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308353
DO - 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308353
M3 - Article
C2 - 25596179
AN - SCOPUS:84929929100
SN - 0017-5749
VL - 65
SP - 852
EP - 860
JO - Gut
JF - Gut
IS - 5
ER -