Test construction of cast-in-place concrete energy pile in dredged and reclaimed ground

Kyoungsik Jung, Byungsik Chun, Sangwoo Park, Hangseok Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluates the feasibility of energy piles equipped with a large-diameter drilled shaft under unfavorable ground conditions. The cast-in-place concrete energy pile was constructed at a test bed in dredged and reclaimed ground in which a confined aquifer exists. Two different configurations of heat exchange pipes (W-shape and S-shape) were designed on each side of the energy pile to compare their thermal performance. The drilled shaft reaches to a depth of 60 m whereas the heat exchange pipes are inserted to about 30 m below the ground surface. In a comparison of constructability, the S-shape heat exchanger resulted in faster installation by about 50% over the W-shape, which implies that the S-shape pipe may provide better constructability for the given construction conditions. A series of in situ thermal response tests (TRTs) were performed to compare the thermal performance of each heat exchanger. The relative heat exchange efficiency (eff) of the W-shape and the S-shape heat exchangers were determined to be 19.15 and 18.88, respectively, which means that the two different types of heat exchange pipe configurations practically yield similar thermal performance. One of the TRTs conducted in the test bed was simulated by a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical model to verify the feasibility of adopting TRTs for energy piles, which reproduces quite well the TRT experimental results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04014035
JournalJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Cast in place concrete
Piles
Pipe
Heat exchangers
Hot Temperature
Aquifers
Numerical models
Computational fluid dynamics

Keywords

  • Cast-in-place concrete energy pile
  • Dredged and reclaimed ground
  • Heat exchange efficiency
  • In situ thermal response test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

Test construction of cast-in-place concrete energy pile in dredged and reclaimed ground. / Jung, Kyoungsik; Chun, Byungsik; Park, Sangwoo; Choi, Hangseok.

In: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 29, No. 1, 04014035, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08e2b97a0e9f47ae9ee0441854a91b2d,
title = "Test construction of cast-in-place concrete energy pile in dredged and reclaimed ground",
abstract = "This study evaluates the feasibility of energy piles equipped with a large-diameter drilled shaft under unfavorable ground conditions. The cast-in-place concrete energy pile was constructed at a test bed in dredged and reclaimed ground in which a confined aquifer exists. Two different configurations of heat exchange pipes (W-shape and S-shape) were designed on each side of the energy pile to compare their thermal performance. The drilled shaft reaches to a depth of 60 m whereas the heat exchange pipes are inserted to about 30 m below the ground surface. In a comparison of constructability, the S-shape heat exchanger resulted in faster installation by about 50{\%} over the W-shape, which implies that the S-shape pipe may provide better constructability for the given construction conditions. A series of in situ thermal response tests (TRTs) were performed to compare the thermal performance of each heat exchanger. The relative heat exchange efficiency (eff) of the W-shape and the S-shape heat exchangers were determined to be 19.15 and 18.88, respectively, which means that the two different types of heat exchange pipe configurations practically yield similar thermal performance. One of the TRTs conducted in the test bed was simulated by a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical model to verify the feasibility of adopting TRTs for energy piles, which reproduces quite well the TRT experimental results.",
keywords = "Cast-in-place concrete energy pile, Dredged and reclaimed ground, Heat exchange efficiency, In situ thermal response test",
author = "Kyoungsik Jung and Byungsik Chun and Sangwoo Park and Hangseok Choi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000446",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
journal = "Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities",
issn = "0887-3828",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test construction of cast-in-place concrete energy pile in dredged and reclaimed ground

AU - Jung, Kyoungsik

AU - Chun, Byungsik

AU - Park, Sangwoo

AU - Choi, Hangseok

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This study evaluates the feasibility of energy piles equipped with a large-diameter drilled shaft under unfavorable ground conditions. The cast-in-place concrete energy pile was constructed at a test bed in dredged and reclaimed ground in which a confined aquifer exists. Two different configurations of heat exchange pipes (W-shape and S-shape) were designed on each side of the energy pile to compare their thermal performance. The drilled shaft reaches to a depth of 60 m whereas the heat exchange pipes are inserted to about 30 m below the ground surface. In a comparison of constructability, the S-shape heat exchanger resulted in faster installation by about 50% over the W-shape, which implies that the S-shape pipe may provide better constructability for the given construction conditions. A series of in situ thermal response tests (TRTs) were performed to compare the thermal performance of each heat exchanger. The relative heat exchange efficiency (eff) of the W-shape and the S-shape heat exchangers were determined to be 19.15 and 18.88, respectively, which means that the two different types of heat exchange pipe configurations practically yield similar thermal performance. One of the TRTs conducted in the test bed was simulated by a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical model to verify the feasibility of adopting TRTs for energy piles, which reproduces quite well the TRT experimental results.

AB - This study evaluates the feasibility of energy piles equipped with a large-diameter drilled shaft under unfavorable ground conditions. The cast-in-place concrete energy pile was constructed at a test bed in dredged and reclaimed ground in which a confined aquifer exists. Two different configurations of heat exchange pipes (W-shape and S-shape) were designed on each side of the energy pile to compare their thermal performance. The drilled shaft reaches to a depth of 60 m whereas the heat exchange pipes are inserted to about 30 m below the ground surface. In a comparison of constructability, the S-shape heat exchanger resulted in faster installation by about 50% over the W-shape, which implies that the S-shape pipe may provide better constructability for the given construction conditions. A series of in situ thermal response tests (TRTs) were performed to compare the thermal performance of each heat exchanger. The relative heat exchange efficiency (eff) of the W-shape and the S-shape heat exchangers were determined to be 19.15 and 18.88, respectively, which means that the two different types of heat exchange pipe configurations practically yield similar thermal performance. One of the TRTs conducted in the test bed was simulated by a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical model to verify the feasibility of adopting TRTs for energy piles, which reproduces quite well the TRT experimental results.

KW - Cast-in-place concrete energy pile

KW - Dredged and reclaimed ground

KW - Heat exchange efficiency

KW - In situ thermal response test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921417744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921417744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000446

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000446

M3 - Article

VL - 29

JO - Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

JF - Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

SN - 0887-3828

IS - 1

M1 - 04014035

ER -