The Berlin brain-computer interface: Progress beyond communication and control

Benjamin Blankertz, Laura Acqualagna, Sven Dähne, Stefan Haufe, Matthias Schultze-Kraft, Irene Sturm, Marija Ušcumlic, Markus A. Wenzel, Gabriel Curio, Klaus Muller

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The combined effect of fundamental results about neurocognitive processes and advancements in decoding mental states from ongoing brain signals has brought forth a whole range of potential neurotechnological applications. In this article, we review our developments in this area and put them into perspective. These examples cover a wide range of maturity levels with respect to their applicability. While we assume we are still a long way away from integrating Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in general interaction with computers, or from implementing neurotechnological measures in safety-critical workplaces, results have already now been obtained involving a BCI as research tool. In this article, we discuss the reasons why, in some of the prospective application domains, considerable effort is still required to make the systems ready to deal with the full complexity of the real world.

Original languageEnglish
Article number530
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume10
Issue numberNOV
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Brain-Computer Interfaces
Berlin
Workplace
Technology
Safety
Brain
Research

Keywords

  • Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI)
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Covert user states
  • Electroencephalography (EEG)
  • Implicit information
  • Machine learning
  • Mental workload
  • Video quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Blankertz, B., Acqualagna, L., Dähne, S., Haufe, S., Schultze-Kraft, M., Sturm, I., ... Muller, K. (2016). The Berlin brain-computer interface: Progress beyond communication and control. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10(NOV), [530]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00530

The Berlin brain-computer interface : Progress beyond communication and control. / Blankertz, Benjamin; Acqualagna, Laura; Dähne, Sven; Haufe, Stefan; Schultze-Kraft, Matthias; Sturm, Irene; Ušcumlic, Marija; Wenzel, Markus A.; Curio, Gabriel; Muller, Klaus.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 10, No. NOV, 530, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Blankertz, B, Acqualagna, L, Dähne, S, Haufe, S, Schultze-Kraft, M, Sturm, I, Ušcumlic, M, Wenzel, MA, Curio, G & Muller, K 2016, 'The Berlin brain-computer interface: Progress beyond communication and control', Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. NOV, 530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00530
Blankertz B, Acqualagna L, Dähne S, Haufe S, Schultze-Kraft M, Sturm I et al. The Berlin brain-computer interface: Progress beyond communication and control. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016 Jan 1;10(NOV). 530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00530
Blankertz, Benjamin ; Acqualagna, Laura ; Dähne, Sven ; Haufe, Stefan ; Schultze-Kraft, Matthias ; Sturm, Irene ; Ušcumlic, Marija ; Wenzel, Markus A. ; Curio, Gabriel ; Muller, Klaus. / The Berlin brain-computer interface : Progress beyond communication and control. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. NOV.
@article{132bad7e3c6846e39481598d5e889d7a,
title = "The Berlin brain-computer interface: Progress beyond communication and control",
abstract = "The combined effect of fundamental results about neurocognitive processes and advancements in decoding mental states from ongoing brain signals has brought forth a whole range of potential neurotechnological applications. In this article, we review our developments in this area and put them into perspective. These examples cover a wide range of maturity levels with respect to their applicability. While we assume we are still a long way away from integrating Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in general interaction with computers, or from implementing neurotechnological measures in safety-critical workplaces, results have already now been obtained involving a BCI as research tool. In this article, we discuss the reasons why, in some of the prospective application domains, considerable effort is still required to make the systems ready to deal with the full complexity of the real world.",
keywords = "Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI), Cognitive neuroscience, Covert user states, Electroencephalography (EEG), Implicit information, Machine learning, Mental workload, Video quality",
author = "Benjamin Blankertz and Laura Acqualagna and Sven D{\"a}hne and Stefan Haufe and Matthias Schultze-Kraft and Irene Sturm and Marija Ušcumlic and Wenzel, {Markus A.} and Gabriel Curio and Klaus Muller",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2016.00530",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-4548",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "NOV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Berlin brain-computer interface

T2 - Progress beyond communication and control

AU - Blankertz, Benjamin

AU - Acqualagna, Laura

AU - Dähne, Sven

AU - Haufe, Stefan

AU - Schultze-Kraft, Matthias

AU - Sturm, Irene

AU - Ušcumlic, Marija

AU - Wenzel, Markus A.

AU - Curio, Gabriel

AU - Muller, Klaus

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The combined effect of fundamental results about neurocognitive processes and advancements in decoding mental states from ongoing brain signals has brought forth a whole range of potential neurotechnological applications. In this article, we review our developments in this area and put them into perspective. These examples cover a wide range of maturity levels with respect to their applicability. While we assume we are still a long way away from integrating Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in general interaction with computers, or from implementing neurotechnological measures in safety-critical workplaces, results have already now been obtained involving a BCI as research tool. In this article, we discuss the reasons why, in some of the prospective application domains, considerable effort is still required to make the systems ready to deal with the full complexity of the real world.

AB - The combined effect of fundamental results about neurocognitive processes and advancements in decoding mental states from ongoing brain signals has brought forth a whole range of potential neurotechnological applications. In this article, we review our developments in this area and put them into perspective. These examples cover a wide range of maturity levels with respect to their applicability. While we assume we are still a long way away from integrating Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in general interaction with computers, or from implementing neurotechnological measures in safety-critical workplaces, results have already now been obtained involving a BCI as research tool. In this article, we discuss the reasons why, in some of the prospective application domains, considerable effort is still required to make the systems ready to deal with the full complexity of the real world.

KW - Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI)

KW - Cognitive neuroscience

KW - Covert user states

KW - Electroencephalography (EEG)

KW - Implicit information

KW - Machine learning

KW - Mental workload

KW - Video quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009740843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009740843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2016.00530

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2016.00530

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85009740843

VL - 10

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-4548

IS - NOV

M1 - 530

ER -