Abstract
Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0189841 |
| Journal | PloS one |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 Dec 1 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
Cite this
The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences : Evidence from plural medical systems. / Shim, Jae-Mahn.
In: PloS one, Vol. 12, No. 12, e0189841, 01.12.2017.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences
T2 - Evidence from plural medical systems
AU - Shim, Jae-Mahn
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.
AB - Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038904835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038904835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0189841
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0189841
M3 - Article
C2 - 29253867
AN - SCOPUS:85038904835
VL - 12
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 12
M1 - e0189841
ER -