The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences

Evidence from plural medical systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0189841
JournalPloS one
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Dec 1

Fingerprint

alternative medicine
Complementary Therapies
Medicine
Health
sociology
Sociology
Insurance Benefits
Health care
health services
data analysis
Delivery of Health Care
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences : Evidence from plural medical systems. / Shim, Jae-Mahn.

In: PloS one, Vol. 12, No. 12, e0189841, 01.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b5269bc06f574d76b8f078ee3bcaca6d,
title = "The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences: Evidence from plural medical systems",
abstract = "Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.",
author = "Jae-Mahn Shim",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0189841",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences

T2 - Evidence from plural medical systems

AU - Shim, Jae-Mahn

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.

AB - Drawing on the theory of social action in organizational and institutional sociology, this paper examines the behavioral consequences of plural logics of action. It addresses the question based on the empirical case of plural medical systems that are composed of both biomedicine and alternative medicine. Applying mixed methods of a cross-national panel data analysis and a content analysis of medical journal articles, it finds that plural systems affect health outcomes negatively when tensions between biomedicine and alternative medicine are unaddressed. In contrast, plural systems produce tangible health benefits when biomedicine and alternative medicine are coordinated through government policies or by health care organizations/professionals. This paper proposes plurality coordination as an important mechanism that modifies the behavioral consequences of plural logics. This proposition contributes to providing theoretical answers to the sociological puzzle that plural logics of action produce inconsistent behavioral consequences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038904835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038904835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0189841

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0189841

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e0189841

ER -