The effect of a desensitizer and CO2 laser irradiation on bond performance between eroded dentin and resin composite

Meng Ding, Sang-Wan Shin, Min Soo Kim, Jae Jun Ryu, Jeong Yol Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. This study was aimed to evaluate effect of the desensitizing pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strengths (μTBS) to eroded dentin and sound dentin. Materials and Methods. Forty-two extracted molars were prepared to form a flat dentin surface, and then they were divided into two groups. Group I was stored in distilled water while group II was subjected to a pH cycling. Each group was then subdivided into three subgroups according to desensitizing pretreatment used: a) pretreatment with desensitizer (Gluma); b) pretreatment with CO2 Laser (Ultra Dream Pluse); c) without any pretreatment. All prepared surfaces were bonded with Single Bond 2 and built up with resin composite (Filtek Z250). The micro-tensile bond test was performed. Fracture modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. Pretreated surfaces and bonded interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data obtained was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α =0.05). Results. For both sound and eroded dentin, samples treated with desensitizer showed the greatest μTBS, followed by samples without any treatment. And samples treated with CO2 laser showed the lowest μTBS. SEM study indicated that teeth with eroded dentin appeared prone to debonding, as demonstrated by existence of large gaps between adhesive layers and dentin. Conclusion. Pretreatment with Gluma increased the μTBS of Single Bond 2 for eroded and sound teeth. CO2 laser irradiation weakened bond performance for sound teeth but had no effect on eroded teeth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-170
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Gas Lasers
Composite Resins
Dentin
Tensile Strength
Tooth
Electrons
Adhesives
Analysis of Variance
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

The effect of a desensitizer and CO2 laser irradiation on bond performance between eroded dentin and resin composite. / Ding, Meng; Shin, Sang-Wan; Kim, Min Soo; Ryu, Jae Jun; Lee, Jeong Yol.

In: Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 165-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6cb6ddb34f94b36b66b932d505e59cf,
title = "The effect of a desensitizer and CO2 laser irradiation on bond performance between eroded dentin and resin composite",
abstract = "Purpose. This study was aimed to evaluate effect of the desensitizing pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strengths (μTBS) to eroded dentin and sound dentin. Materials and Methods. Forty-two extracted molars were prepared to form a flat dentin surface, and then they were divided into two groups. Group I was stored in distilled water while group II was subjected to a pH cycling. Each group was then subdivided into three subgroups according to desensitizing pretreatment used: a) pretreatment with desensitizer (Gluma); b) pretreatment with CO2 Laser (Ultra Dream Pluse); c) without any pretreatment. All prepared surfaces were bonded with Single Bond 2 and built up with resin composite (Filtek Z250). The micro-tensile bond test was performed. Fracture modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. Pretreated surfaces and bonded interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data obtained was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α =0.05). Results. For both sound and eroded dentin, samples treated with desensitizer showed the greatest μTBS, followed by samples without any treatment. And samples treated with CO2 laser showed the lowest μTBS. SEM study indicated that teeth with eroded dentin appeared prone to debonding, as demonstrated by existence of large gaps between adhesive layers and dentin. Conclusion. Pretreatment with Gluma increased the μTBS of Single Bond 2 for eroded and sound teeth. CO2 laser irradiation weakened bond performance for sound teeth but had no effect on eroded teeth.",
keywords = "Adhesives, Gluma dentin desensitizer, Lasers, Tensile strength, Tooth erosion",
author = "Meng Ding and Sang-Wan Shin and Kim, {Min Soo} and Ryu, {Jae Jun} and Lee, {Jeong Yol}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.165",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "165--170",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics",
issn = "2005-7806",
publisher = "The Korean Academy of prosthodontics",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of a desensitizer and CO2 laser irradiation on bond performance between eroded dentin and resin composite

AU - Ding, Meng

AU - Shin, Sang-Wan

AU - Kim, Min Soo

AU - Ryu, Jae Jun

AU - Lee, Jeong Yol

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose. This study was aimed to evaluate effect of the desensitizing pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strengths (μTBS) to eroded dentin and sound dentin. Materials and Methods. Forty-two extracted molars were prepared to form a flat dentin surface, and then they were divided into two groups. Group I was stored in distilled water while group II was subjected to a pH cycling. Each group was then subdivided into three subgroups according to desensitizing pretreatment used: a) pretreatment with desensitizer (Gluma); b) pretreatment with CO2 Laser (Ultra Dream Pluse); c) without any pretreatment. All prepared surfaces were bonded with Single Bond 2 and built up with resin composite (Filtek Z250). The micro-tensile bond test was performed. Fracture modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. Pretreated surfaces and bonded interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data obtained was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α =0.05). Results. For both sound and eroded dentin, samples treated with desensitizer showed the greatest μTBS, followed by samples without any treatment. And samples treated with CO2 laser showed the lowest μTBS. SEM study indicated that teeth with eroded dentin appeared prone to debonding, as demonstrated by existence of large gaps between adhesive layers and dentin. Conclusion. Pretreatment with Gluma increased the μTBS of Single Bond 2 for eroded and sound teeth. CO2 laser irradiation weakened bond performance for sound teeth but had no effect on eroded teeth.

AB - Purpose. This study was aimed to evaluate effect of the desensitizing pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strengths (μTBS) to eroded dentin and sound dentin. Materials and Methods. Forty-two extracted molars were prepared to form a flat dentin surface, and then they were divided into two groups. Group I was stored in distilled water while group II was subjected to a pH cycling. Each group was then subdivided into three subgroups according to desensitizing pretreatment used: a) pretreatment with desensitizer (Gluma); b) pretreatment with CO2 Laser (Ultra Dream Pluse); c) without any pretreatment. All prepared surfaces were bonded with Single Bond 2 and built up with resin composite (Filtek Z250). The micro-tensile bond test was performed. Fracture modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. Pretreated surfaces and bonded interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data obtained was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α =0.05). Results. For both sound and eroded dentin, samples treated with desensitizer showed the greatest μTBS, followed by samples without any treatment. And samples treated with CO2 laser showed the lowest μTBS. SEM study indicated that teeth with eroded dentin appeared prone to debonding, as demonstrated by existence of large gaps between adhesive layers and dentin. Conclusion. Pretreatment with Gluma increased the μTBS of Single Bond 2 for eroded and sound teeth. CO2 laser irradiation weakened bond performance for sound teeth but had no effect on eroded teeth.

KW - Adhesives

KW - Gluma dentin desensitizer

KW - Lasers

KW - Tensile strength

KW - Tooth erosion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904066435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904066435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.165

DO - 10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.165

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904066435

VL - 6

SP - 165

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

SN - 2005-7806

IS - 3

ER -