TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of epithelial ovarian carcinoma
T2 - A pilot study
AU - Lee, Jae Kwan
AU - Min, Kyung Jin
AU - So, Kyeong A.
AU - Kim, Sungeun
AU - Hong, Jin Hwa
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/2/5
Y1 - 2014/2/5
N2 - Background: The aim of our study is to establish the potential role of dual-phase 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography / computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients presenting ovarian masses with diffuse peritoneal infiltration for differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Methods. Twenty patients (13 with ovarian cancers and 7 with benign lesions) were evaluated preoperatively by dual-phase 18F-FDG-PET/CT performed 1 h and 2 h after injection of 18F-FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV§ssub§max§esub§) for both time points SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ and SUV§ssub§ max2§esub§ were determined, respectively, and the retention index (RI) was calculated by subtracting the SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ from the SUV§ssub§max2§esub§ and dividing by SUV§ssub§ max1§esub§. Results: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ and SUV§ssub§max2§esub§ were 0.753 (P = 0.062, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.512-0.915) and 0.835 (P = 0.001, 95% CI = 0.604-0.961), respectively. The AUC of the RI was 0.901 (P < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.684-0.988). Using pairwise comparisons, the AUC of SUV§ssub§max2§esub§ was significantly higher than that of SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ (P = 0.032). The AUC of the RI was higher than those of SUV§ssub§ max1§esub§ and SUV§ssub§max2§esub§, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT might be considered when preoperative imaging is indeterminate. A larger-scaled, prospective study is needed to verify these results.
AB - Background: The aim of our study is to establish the potential role of dual-phase 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography / computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients presenting ovarian masses with diffuse peritoneal infiltration for differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Methods. Twenty patients (13 with ovarian cancers and 7 with benign lesions) were evaluated preoperatively by dual-phase 18F-FDG-PET/CT performed 1 h and 2 h after injection of 18F-FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV§ssub§max§esub§) for both time points SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ and SUV§ssub§ max2§esub§ were determined, respectively, and the retention index (RI) was calculated by subtracting the SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ from the SUV§ssub§max2§esub§ and dividing by SUV§ssub§ max1§esub§. Results: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ and SUV§ssub§max2§esub§ were 0.753 (P = 0.062, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.512-0.915) and 0.835 (P = 0.001, 95% CI = 0.604-0.961), respectively. The AUC of the RI was 0.901 (P < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.684-0.988). Using pairwise comparisons, the AUC of SUV§ssub§max2§esub§ was significantly higher than that of SUV§ssub§max1§esub§ (P = 0.032). The AUC of the RI was higher than those of SUV§ssub§ max1§esub§ and SUV§ssub§max2§esub§, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT might be considered when preoperative imaging is indeterminate. A larger-scaled, prospective study is needed to verify these results.
KW - Dual-phase
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Positron emission tomography
KW - Retention index
KW - Standardized uptake value
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893174372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893174372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1757-2215-7-15
DO - 10.1186/1757-2215-7-15
M3 - Article
C2 - 24499648
AN - SCOPUS:84893174372
VL - 7
JO - Journal of Ovarian Research
JF - Journal of Ovarian Research
SN - 1757-2215
IS - 1
M1 - 15
ER -