The effects of intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin in superficial bladder cancer: A preliminary study

D. Y. Cho, J. H. Bae, D. G. Moon, J. Cheon, J. G. Lee, J. J. Kim, D. K. Yoon, Hong Seok Park

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This prospective study investigated the long-term effects of intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG; n = 36) versus BCG alone (n = 51) for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. For the chemoimmunotherapy (GEM + BCG) group, GEM (1000 mg) was instilled immediately after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) and again (2000 mg) 1 week later. From 2 to 7 weeks after TURBT, BCG was instilled into the bladder of all patients once weekly. The recurrence-free period of the GEM + BCG group (24.13 months) was significantly longer than that of the BCG monotherapy group (19.81 months). The overall recurrence rate was similar between the groups, although at 6 and 9 months post-TURBT, GEM + BCG produced a significantly lower rate of recurrence compared with BCG alone. This study suggests that intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with GEM + BCG is effective in reducing early tumour recurrence and in prolonging the recurrence-free period of superficial bladder cancer.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1823-1830
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of International Medical Research
    Volume37
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • BCG
    • Gemcitabine
    • Intravesical chemoimmunotherapy
    • Recurrence rate
    • Superficial bladder cancer

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Biochemistry
    • Cell Biology
    • Biochemistry, medical

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin in superficial bladder cancer: A preliminary study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this