The effects of relative humidity on the performances of PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents

Kun Ho Kim, Kwan Young Lee, Sang Yeop Lee, Eunae Cho, Tae Hoon Lim, Hyoung Juhn Kim, Sung Pil Yoon, Sae Hoon Kim, Tae Won Lim, Jong Hyun Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For PEMFC operation, water management is very important to provide both sufficient proton conductivity and mass transport. Therefore, in this study, the effect of the relative humidity (38-87%) on cell performance is examined for PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents. The MEAs were fabricated using a CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method. As the relative humidity of the cathodes (RHC) increases, the cell voltages at 0.4 and 1.2 A/cm2 increased for a MEA with 20 wt% ionomer. This can be explained in terms of the expansion of active sites with enhanced ionic conductivity (activation overpotential). In contrast, with a higher RHC value, the cell voltages for 35 wt% ionomer (more hydrophilic) gradually decreased as a result of slower gas transport (concentration overpotential). For MEAs with intermediate ionomer contents, 25 and 30 wt%, the cell voltages at 0.4 A/cm 2 showed maximum values at a RHC of 67%, at which point the mass transport begins to be the more dominant factor. The highest unit cell performance was observed in a MEA with an ionomer content of 25 wt% at a RHC of 59% and in a MEA at 20 wt% ionomer content at a higher humidity of 87%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13104-13110
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume35
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Ionomers
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC)
humidity
Atmospheric humidity
Cathodes
cathodes
cells
Electric potential
electric potential
Mass transfer
water management
gas transport
Proton conductivity
Water management
spraying
Ionic conductivity
Spraying
ion currents
Chemical activation
activation

Keywords

  • CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method
  • MEA (membrane-electrode assembly)
  • Nafion ionomer
  • PEMFC (polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell)
  • Relative humidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

The effects of relative humidity on the performances of PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents. / Kim, Kun Ho; Lee, Kwan Young; Lee, Sang Yeop; Cho, Eunae; Lim, Tae Hoon; Kim, Hyoung Juhn; Yoon, Sung Pil; Kim, Sae Hoon; Lim, Tae Won; Jang, Jong Hyun.

In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 35, No. 23, 01.12.2010, p. 13104-13110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Kun Ho ; Lee, Kwan Young ; Lee, Sang Yeop ; Cho, Eunae ; Lim, Tae Hoon ; Kim, Hyoung Juhn ; Yoon, Sung Pil ; Kim, Sae Hoon ; Lim, Tae Won ; Jang, Jong Hyun. / The effects of relative humidity on the performances of PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents. In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 23. pp. 13104-13110.
@article{1b3bc824e5064fc080e09527cd34bd32,
title = "The effects of relative humidity on the performances of PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion{\circledR} ionomer contents",
abstract = "For PEMFC operation, water management is very important to provide both sufficient proton conductivity and mass transport. Therefore, in this study, the effect of the relative humidity (38-87{\%}) on cell performance is examined for PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion{\circledR} ionomer contents. The MEAs were fabricated using a CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method. As the relative humidity of the cathodes (RHC) increases, the cell voltages at 0.4 and 1.2 A/cm2 increased for a MEA with 20 wt{\%} ionomer. This can be explained in terms of the expansion of active sites with enhanced ionic conductivity (activation overpotential). In contrast, with a higher RHC value, the cell voltages for 35 wt{\%} ionomer (more hydrophilic) gradually decreased as a result of slower gas transport (concentration overpotential). For MEAs with intermediate ionomer contents, 25 and 30 wt{\%}, the cell voltages at 0.4 A/cm 2 showed maximum values at a RHC of 67{\%}, at which point the mass transport begins to be the more dominant factor. The highest unit cell performance was observed in a MEA with an ionomer content of 25 wt{\%} at a RHC of 59{\%} and in a MEA at 20 wt{\%} ionomer content at a higher humidity of 87{\%}.",
keywords = "CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method, MEA (membrane-electrode assembly), Nafion ionomer, PEMFC (polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell), Relative humidity",
author = "Kim, {Kun Ho} and Lee, {Kwan Young} and Lee, {Sang Yeop} and Eunae Cho and Lim, {Tae Hoon} and Kim, {Hyoung Juhn} and Yoon, {Sung Pil} and Kim, {Sae Hoon} and Lim, {Tae Won} and Jang, {Jong Hyun}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.082",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "13104--13110",
journal = "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy",
issn = "0360-3199",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of relative humidity on the performances of PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents

AU - Kim, Kun Ho

AU - Lee, Kwan Young

AU - Lee, Sang Yeop

AU - Cho, Eunae

AU - Lim, Tae Hoon

AU - Kim, Hyoung Juhn

AU - Yoon, Sung Pil

AU - Kim, Sae Hoon

AU - Lim, Tae Won

AU - Jang, Jong Hyun

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - For PEMFC operation, water management is very important to provide both sufficient proton conductivity and mass transport. Therefore, in this study, the effect of the relative humidity (38-87%) on cell performance is examined for PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents. The MEAs were fabricated using a CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method. As the relative humidity of the cathodes (RHC) increases, the cell voltages at 0.4 and 1.2 A/cm2 increased for a MEA with 20 wt% ionomer. This can be explained in terms of the expansion of active sites with enhanced ionic conductivity (activation overpotential). In contrast, with a higher RHC value, the cell voltages for 35 wt% ionomer (more hydrophilic) gradually decreased as a result of slower gas transport (concentration overpotential). For MEAs with intermediate ionomer contents, 25 and 30 wt%, the cell voltages at 0.4 A/cm 2 showed maximum values at a RHC of 67%, at which point the mass transport begins to be the more dominant factor. The highest unit cell performance was observed in a MEA with an ionomer content of 25 wt% at a RHC of 59% and in a MEA at 20 wt% ionomer content at a higher humidity of 87%.

AB - For PEMFC operation, water management is very important to provide both sufficient proton conductivity and mass transport. Therefore, in this study, the effect of the relative humidity (38-87%) on cell performance is examined for PEMFC MEAs with various Nafion® ionomer contents. The MEAs were fabricated using a CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method. As the relative humidity of the cathodes (RHC) increases, the cell voltages at 0.4 and 1.2 A/cm2 increased for a MEA with 20 wt% ionomer. This can be explained in terms of the expansion of active sites with enhanced ionic conductivity (activation overpotential). In contrast, with a higher RHC value, the cell voltages for 35 wt% ionomer (more hydrophilic) gradually decreased as a result of slower gas transport (concentration overpotential). For MEAs with intermediate ionomer contents, 25 and 30 wt%, the cell voltages at 0.4 A/cm 2 showed maximum values at a RHC of 67%, at which point the mass transport begins to be the more dominant factor. The highest unit cell performance was observed in a MEA with an ionomer content of 25 wt% at a RHC of 59% and in a MEA at 20 wt% ionomer content at a higher humidity of 87%.

KW - CCM (catalyst-coated membrane) spraying method

KW - MEA (membrane-electrode assembly)

KW - Nafion ionomer

KW - PEMFC (polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell)

KW - Relative humidity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049453756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049453756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.082

DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.082

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78049453756

VL - 35

SP - 13104

EP - 13110

JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

SN - 0360-3199

IS - 23

ER -