The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation

Byeong Kuk Ham, Sung-Gu Kang, Hoon Choi, Young Hwii Ko, Seok Ho Kang, Jun Cheon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the impact of renal tumor size on the oncologic and surgical efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryosurgery (LRC) according to our intermediate-term experience in Korea. Materials and Methods: From June 2005 to October 2008, we enrolled 37 patients who underwent LRC for 40 renal tumors. Patients were stratified into four groups according to renal tumor size. Patients who presented with a maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of at least 1 cm but less than 2 cm were assigned to Group 1, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 2 but less than 3 cm were assigned to Group 2, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 3 but less than 4 cm were assigned to Group 3, and those with an MTD equal to or greater than 4 cm were assigned to Group 4. Oncologic and clinical outcomes in each group were compared. Results: The four groups showed no statistically significant differences in preoperative variables, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, baseline renal function and hemoglobin, and length of hospital stay. Regarding surgical aspects, however, operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were significantly increased in patients with larger tumors. Three patients in Group 3 required postoperative transfusions, and 1 patient in Group 4 required conversion to open renal cryosurgery. During the mean follow-up period of 31.6 months, radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence was found in only 2 patients in Group 4. Conclusions: In this series, LRC for renal tumors smaller than 3 cm was conducted safely without radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence during intermediate-term follow-up. For tumors larger than 3 cm, however, the transfusion rate increased, and for renal tumors larger than 4 cm, the tumor recurrence rate increased significantly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-177
Number of pages7
JournalKorean Journal of Urology
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Cryosurgery
Kidney
Neoplasms
Recurrence
Length of Stay
Korea

Keywords

  • Cryosurgery
  • Laparoscopy
  • Renal cell carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation. / Ham, Byeong Kuk; Kang, Sung-Gu; Choi, Hoon; Ko, Young Hwii; Kang, Seok Ho; Cheon, Jun.

In: Korean Journal of Urology, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.03.2010, p. 171-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6aec8e5173bb45e4b74f200cca721354,
title = "The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated the impact of renal tumor size on the oncologic and surgical efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryosurgery (LRC) according to our intermediate-term experience in Korea. Materials and Methods: From June 2005 to October 2008, we enrolled 37 patients who underwent LRC for 40 renal tumors. Patients were stratified into four groups according to renal tumor size. Patients who presented with a maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of at least 1 cm but less than 2 cm were assigned to Group 1, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 2 but less than 3 cm were assigned to Group 2, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 3 but less than 4 cm were assigned to Group 3, and those with an MTD equal to or greater than 4 cm were assigned to Group 4. Oncologic and clinical outcomes in each group were compared. Results: The four groups showed no statistically significant differences in preoperative variables, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, baseline renal function and hemoglobin, and length of hospital stay. Regarding surgical aspects, however, operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were significantly increased in patients with larger tumors. Three patients in Group 3 required postoperative transfusions, and 1 patient in Group 4 required conversion to open renal cryosurgery. During the mean follow-up period of 31.6 months, radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence was found in only 2 patients in Group 4. Conclusions: In this series, LRC for renal tumors smaller than 3 cm was conducted safely without radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence during intermediate-term follow-up. For tumors larger than 3 cm, however, the transfusion rate increased, and for renal tumors larger than 4 cm, the tumor recurrence rate increased significantly.",
keywords = "Cryosurgery, Laparoscopy, Renal cell carcinoma",
author = "Ham, {Byeong Kuk} and Sung-Gu Kang and Hoon Choi and Ko, {Young Hwii} and Kang, {Seok Ho} and Jun Cheon",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.171",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "171--177",
journal = "Korean Journal of Urology",
issn = "2005-6737",
publisher = "Korean Urological Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation

AU - Ham, Byeong Kuk

AU - Kang, Sung-Gu

AU - Choi, Hoon

AU - Ko, Young Hwii

AU - Kang, Seok Ho

AU - Cheon, Jun

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated the impact of renal tumor size on the oncologic and surgical efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryosurgery (LRC) according to our intermediate-term experience in Korea. Materials and Methods: From June 2005 to October 2008, we enrolled 37 patients who underwent LRC for 40 renal tumors. Patients were stratified into four groups according to renal tumor size. Patients who presented with a maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of at least 1 cm but less than 2 cm were assigned to Group 1, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 2 but less than 3 cm were assigned to Group 2, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 3 but less than 4 cm were assigned to Group 3, and those with an MTD equal to or greater than 4 cm were assigned to Group 4. Oncologic and clinical outcomes in each group were compared. Results: The four groups showed no statistically significant differences in preoperative variables, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, baseline renal function and hemoglobin, and length of hospital stay. Regarding surgical aspects, however, operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were significantly increased in patients with larger tumors. Three patients in Group 3 required postoperative transfusions, and 1 patient in Group 4 required conversion to open renal cryosurgery. During the mean follow-up period of 31.6 months, radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence was found in only 2 patients in Group 4. Conclusions: In this series, LRC for renal tumors smaller than 3 cm was conducted safely without radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence during intermediate-term follow-up. For tumors larger than 3 cm, however, the transfusion rate increased, and for renal tumors larger than 4 cm, the tumor recurrence rate increased significantly.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated the impact of renal tumor size on the oncologic and surgical efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryosurgery (LRC) according to our intermediate-term experience in Korea. Materials and Methods: From June 2005 to October 2008, we enrolled 37 patients who underwent LRC for 40 renal tumors. Patients were stratified into four groups according to renal tumor size. Patients who presented with a maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of at least 1 cm but less than 2 cm were assigned to Group 1, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 2 but less than 3 cm were assigned to Group 2, those with an MTD equal to or greater than 3 but less than 4 cm were assigned to Group 3, and those with an MTD equal to or greater than 4 cm were assigned to Group 4. Oncologic and clinical outcomes in each group were compared. Results: The four groups showed no statistically significant differences in preoperative variables, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, baseline renal function and hemoglobin, and length of hospital stay. Regarding surgical aspects, however, operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were significantly increased in patients with larger tumors. Three patients in Group 3 required postoperative transfusions, and 1 patient in Group 4 required conversion to open renal cryosurgery. During the mean follow-up period of 31.6 months, radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence was found in only 2 patients in Group 4. Conclusions: In this series, LRC for renal tumors smaller than 3 cm was conducted safely without radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence during intermediate-term follow-up. For tumors larger than 3 cm, however, the transfusion rate increased, and for renal tumors larger than 4 cm, the tumor recurrence rate increased significantly.

KW - Cryosurgery

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Renal cell carcinoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949711315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949711315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.171

DO - 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.171

M3 - Article

C2 - 20414392

AN - SCOPUS:77949711315

VL - 51

SP - 171

EP - 177

JO - Korean Journal of Urology

JF - Korean Journal of Urology

SN - 2005-6737

IS - 3

ER -