The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies

Alessandro Nesti, Karl A. Beykirch, Paul R. MacNeilage, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Heinrich Bulthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motion simulators are widely employed in basic and applied research to study the neural mechanisms of perception and action during inertial stimulation. In these studies, uncontrolled simulator-introduced noise inevitably leads to a disparity between the reproduced motion and the trajectories meticulously designed by the experimenter, possibly resulting in undesired motion cues to the investigated system. Understanding actual simulator responses to different motion commands is therefore a crucial yet often underestimated step towards the interpretation of experimental results. In this work, we developed analysis methods based on signal processing techniques to quantify the noise in the actual motion, and its deterministic and stochastic components. Our methods allow comparisons between commanded and actual motion as well as between different actual motion profiles. A specific practical example from one of our studies is used to illustrate the methodologies and their relevance, but this does not detract from its general applicability. Analyses of the simulator's inertial recordings show direction-dependent noise and nonlinearity related to the command amplitude. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio is one order of magnitude higher for the larger motion amplitudes we tested, compared to the smaller motion amplitudes. Simulator-introduced noise is found to be primarily of deterministic nature, particularly for the stronger motion intensities. The effect of simulator noise on quantification of animal/human motion sensitivity is discussed. We conclude that accurate recording and characterization of executed simulator motion are a crucial prerequisite for the investigation of uncertainty in self-motion perception.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere94570
JournalPLoS One
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Apr 22

Fingerprint

Noise
Simulators
methodology
trajectories
uncertainty
Signal to noise ratio
Signal processing
Animals
Motion Perception
Trajectories
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Uncertainty
Cues
animals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nesti, A., Beykirch, K. A., MacNeilage, P. R., Barnett-Cowan, M., & Bulthoff, H. (2014). The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies. PLoS One, 9(4), [e94570]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094570

The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies. / Nesti, Alessandro; Beykirch, Karl A.; MacNeilage, Paul R.; Barnett-Cowan, Michael; Bulthoff, Heinrich.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 9, No. 4, e94570, 22.04.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nesti, A, Beykirch, KA, MacNeilage, PR, Barnett-Cowan, M & Bulthoff, H 2014, 'The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies', PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 4, e94570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094570
Nesti, Alessandro ; Beykirch, Karl A. ; MacNeilage, Paul R. ; Barnett-Cowan, Michael ; Bulthoff, Heinrich. / The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies. In: PLoS One. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 4.
@article{12b23b6ad88c44c5a4ce700630ec8478,
title = "The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies",
abstract = "Motion simulators are widely employed in basic and applied research to study the neural mechanisms of perception and action during inertial stimulation. In these studies, uncontrolled simulator-introduced noise inevitably leads to a disparity between the reproduced motion and the trajectories meticulously designed by the experimenter, possibly resulting in undesired motion cues to the investigated system. Understanding actual simulator responses to different motion commands is therefore a crucial yet often underestimated step towards the interpretation of experimental results. In this work, we developed analysis methods based on signal processing techniques to quantify the noise in the actual motion, and its deterministic and stochastic components. Our methods allow comparisons between commanded and actual motion as well as between different actual motion profiles. A specific practical example from one of our studies is used to illustrate the methodologies and their relevance, but this does not detract from its general applicability. Analyses of the simulator's inertial recordings show direction-dependent noise and nonlinearity related to the command amplitude. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio is one order of magnitude higher for the larger motion amplitudes we tested, compared to the smaller motion amplitudes. Simulator-introduced noise is found to be primarily of deterministic nature, particularly for the stronger motion intensities. The effect of simulator noise on quantification of animal/human motion sensitivity is discussed. We conclude that accurate recording and characterization of executed simulator motion are a crucial prerequisite for the investigation of uncertainty in self-motion perception.",
author = "Alessandro Nesti and Beykirch, {Karl A.} and MacNeilage, {Paul R.} and Michael Barnett-Cowan and Heinrich Bulthoff",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0094570",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies

AU - Nesti, Alessandro

AU - Beykirch, Karl A.

AU - MacNeilage, Paul R.

AU - Barnett-Cowan, Michael

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

PY - 2014/4/22

Y1 - 2014/4/22

N2 - Motion simulators are widely employed in basic and applied research to study the neural mechanisms of perception and action during inertial stimulation. In these studies, uncontrolled simulator-introduced noise inevitably leads to a disparity between the reproduced motion and the trajectories meticulously designed by the experimenter, possibly resulting in undesired motion cues to the investigated system. Understanding actual simulator responses to different motion commands is therefore a crucial yet often underestimated step towards the interpretation of experimental results. In this work, we developed analysis methods based on signal processing techniques to quantify the noise in the actual motion, and its deterministic and stochastic components. Our methods allow comparisons between commanded and actual motion as well as between different actual motion profiles. A specific practical example from one of our studies is used to illustrate the methodologies and their relevance, but this does not detract from its general applicability. Analyses of the simulator's inertial recordings show direction-dependent noise and nonlinearity related to the command amplitude. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio is one order of magnitude higher for the larger motion amplitudes we tested, compared to the smaller motion amplitudes. Simulator-introduced noise is found to be primarily of deterministic nature, particularly for the stronger motion intensities. The effect of simulator noise on quantification of animal/human motion sensitivity is discussed. We conclude that accurate recording and characterization of executed simulator motion are a crucial prerequisite for the investigation of uncertainty in self-motion perception.

AB - Motion simulators are widely employed in basic and applied research to study the neural mechanisms of perception and action during inertial stimulation. In these studies, uncontrolled simulator-introduced noise inevitably leads to a disparity between the reproduced motion and the trajectories meticulously designed by the experimenter, possibly resulting in undesired motion cues to the investigated system. Understanding actual simulator responses to different motion commands is therefore a crucial yet often underestimated step towards the interpretation of experimental results. In this work, we developed analysis methods based on signal processing techniques to quantify the noise in the actual motion, and its deterministic and stochastic components. Our methods allow comparisons between commanded and actual motion as well as between different actual motion profiles. A specific practical example from one of our studies is used to illustrate the methodologies and their relevance, but this does not detract from its general applicability. Analyses of the simulator's inertial recordings show direction-dependent noise and nonlinearity related to the command amplitude. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio is one order of magnitude higher for the larger motion amplitudes we tested, compared to the smaller motion amplitudes. Simulator-introduced noise is found to be primarily of deterministic nature, particularly for the stronger motion intensities. The effect of simulator noise on quantification of animal/human motion sensitivity is discussed. We conclude that accurate recording and characterization of executed simulator motion are a crucial prerequisite for the investigation of uncertainty in self-motion perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899704473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899704473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0094570

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0094570

M3 - Article

C2 - 24755871

AN - SCOPUS:84899704473

VL - 9

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e94570

ER -