The initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing cryoablation for renal tumor

Min Gu Park, Seok Ho Kang, Jun Cheon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We report here on our initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing renal cryoablation, which is one of the minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgeries. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 10 patients who had renal neoplasm identified on computed tomography (CT) and who underwent 3rd generation cryoablation from August 2004 to May 2006. The operative indications were a tumor less than 4cm in diameter, an exophytic mass with malignant potential and those cases like solitary kidney, bilateral tumor or renal insufficiency that needed preservation of renal function. Eight patients underwent minimal incision open cryoablation, and the other two underwent laparoscopic cryoablation. In every case, there were 2-3 cycles of freeze and thawing and we monitored the tumor and ice ball via intraoperative ultrasound. Results: The size of the iceball was maintained more than 1cm apart from the margin of the tumor to secure a safety margin. The average operation time of open cryoablation was 1.7 hr and that of laparoscopic cryoablation was 2.2 hr; the average blood loss was 194cc and 55cc, respectively. The average period of hospitalization after operation was 6.6 days and 3 days, respectively, and there was no complication except for one patient who had postoperative pulmonary effusion. During a mean follow-up of 14.1 months, no patient died and all the patients except one remained without local recurrence. Conclusions: As a result of our initial experience, renal cryoablation turned out to have an excellent effect of tumor erradication and few complications. Although long term follow-up results are necessary, laparoscopic renal cryoablation is considered a minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgery that could be substituted for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-370
Number of pages8
JournalKorean Journal of Urology
Volume48
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Cryosurgery
Nephrons
Kidney
Neoplasms
Kidney Neoplasms
Ice
Nephrectomy
Renal Insufficiency
Hospitalization
Tomography
Safety
Recurrence
Lung

Keywords

  • Cryoablation
  • Renal neoplasm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

The initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing cryoablation for renal tumor. / Park, Min Gu; Kang, Seok Ho; Cheon, Jun.

In: Korean Journal of Urology, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.04.2007, p. 363-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7efeb784a6ee4f27ac39be95b538c738,
title = "The initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing cryoablation for renal tumor",
abstract = "Purpose: We report here on our initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing renal cryoablation, which is one of the minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgeries. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 10 patients who had renal neoplasm identified on computed tomography (CT) and who underwent 3rd generation cryoablation from August 2004 to May 2006. The operative indications were a tumor less than 4cm in diameter, an exophytic mass with malignant potential and those cases like solitary kidney, bilateral tumor or renal insufficiency that needed preservation of renal function. Eight patients underwent minimal incision open cryoablation, and the other two underwent laparoscopic cryoablation. In every case, there were 2-3 cycles of freeze and thawing and we monitored the tumor and ice ball via intraoperative ultrasound. Results: The size of the iceball was maintained more than 1cm apart from the margin of the tumor to secure a safety margin. The average operation time of open cryoablation was 1.7 hr and that of laparoscopic cryoablation was 2.2 hr; the average blood loss was 194cc and 55cc, respectively. The average period of hospitalization after operation was 6.6 days and 3 days, respectively, and there was no complication except for one patient who had postoperative pulmonary effusion. During a mean follow-up of 14.1 months, no patient died and all the patients except one remained without local recurrence. Conclusions: As a result of our initial experience, renal cryoablation turned out to have an excellent effect of tumor erradication and few complications. Although long term follow-up results are necessary, laparoscopic renal cryoablation is considered a minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgery that could be substituted for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the future.",
keywords = "Cryoablation, Renal neoplasm",
author = "Park, {Min Gu} and Kang, {Seok Ho} and Jun Cheon",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "363--370",
journal = "Korean Journal of Urology",
issn = "2005-6737",
publisher = "Korean Urological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing cryoablation for renal tumor

AU - Park, Min Gu

AU - Kang, Seok Ho

AU - Cheon, Jun

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Purpose: We report here on our initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing renal cryoablation, which is one of the minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgeries. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 10 patients who had renal neoplasm identified on computed tomography (CT) and who underwent 3rd generation cryoablation from August 2004 to May 2006. The operative indications were a tumor less than 4cm in diameter, an exophytic mass with malignant potential and those cases like solitary kidney, bilateral tumor or renal insufficiency that needed preservation of renal function. Eight patients underwent minimal incision open cryoablation, and the other two underwent laparoscopic cryoablation. In every case, there were 2-3 cycles of freeze and thawing and we monitored the tumor and ice ball via intraoperative ultrasound. Results: The size of the iceball was maintained more than 1cm apart from the margin of the tumor to secure a safety margin. The average operation time of open cryoablation was 1.7 hr and that of laparoscopic cryoablation was 2.2 hr; the average blood loss was 194cc and 55cc, respectively. The average period of hospitalization after operation was 6.6 days and 3 days, respectively, and there was no complication except for one patient who had postoperative pulmonary effusion. During a mean follow-up of 14.1 months, no patient died and all the patients except one remained without local recurrence. Conclusions: As a result of our initial experience, renal cryoablation turned out to have an excellent effect of tumor erradication and few complications. Although long term follow-up results are necessary, laparoscopic renal cryoablation is considered a minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgery that could be substituted for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the future.

AB - Purpose: We report here on our initial experience with 3rd generation nephron-sparing renal cryoablation, which is one of the minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgeries. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 10 patients who had renal neoplasm identified on computed tomography (CT) and who underwent 3rd generation cryoablation from August 2004 to May 2006. The operative indications were a tumor less than 4cm in diameter, an exophytic mass with malignant potential and those cases like solitary kidney, bilateral tumor or renal insufficiency that needed preservation of renal function. Eight patients underwent minimal incision open cryoablation, and the other two underwent laparoscopic cryoablation. In every case, there were 2-3 cycles of freeze and thawing and we monitored the tumor and ice ball via intraoperative ultrasound. Results: The size of the iceball was maintained more than 1cm apart from the margin of the tumor to secure a safety margin. The average operation time of open cryoablation was 1.7 hr and that of laparoscopic cryoablation was 2.2 hr; the average blood loss was 194cc and 55cc, respectively. The average period of hospitalization after operation was 6.6 days and 3 days, respectively, and there was no complication except for one patient who had postoperative pulmonary effusion. During a mean follow-up of 14.1 months, no patient died and all the patients except one remained without local recurrence. Conclusions: As a result of our initial experience, renal cryoablation turned out to have an excellent effect of tumor erradication and few complications. Although long term follow-up results are necessary, laparoscopic renal cryoablation is considered a minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgery that could be substituted for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the future.

KW - Cryoablation

KW - Renal neoplasm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247868027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247868027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 363

EP - 370

JO - Korean Journal of Urology

JF - Korean Journal of Urology

SN - 2005-6737

IS - 4

ER -