The Korean spinal neurosurgery society; Are we reimbursed properly for spinal neurosurgical practices under the Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale service?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale (K-RBRVS) was introduced in 2001 as an alternative of the previous medical fee schedule. Unfortunately, most neurosurgeons are unfamiliar with the details of the K-RBRVS and how it affects the reimbursement rates for the surgical procedures we perform. We summarize the K-RBRVS in brief, and discuss on how the relative value (RV) of the spinal neurosurgical procedures have changed since the introduction in 2001. Methods: We analyzed the change of spinal procedure RVs since 2001, and compared it with the change of values in the brain neurosurgical procedures. RVs of 88 neurospinal procedures on the list of K-RBRVS were analyzed, while 24 procedures added during annual revisions were excluded. Results: During the past 15 years, RVs for spinal procedures have increased 62.8%, which is not so different with the cumulative increase of consumer prices during this time period or the increase rate of 92.3% for brain surgeries. When comparing the change of RVs in more complex procedures between spinal and brain neurosurgery, the increase rate was 125.3% and 133%, respectively. Conclusion: More effort of the society of spinal surgeons seems to be needed to get adequate reimbursement, as there have been some discrimination compared to brain surgeons in the increase of RVs. And considering the relative underestimation of spinal neurosurgeons′ labor, more objective measures of neurospinal surgeons′ work and productivity should be developed for impartial reimbursement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-53
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Relative Value Scales
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgical Procedures
Brain
Medical Fees
Fee Schedules

Keywords

  • Korean resource based relative value scale
  • Medical fee schedule
  • Neurosurgery
  • Reimbursement
  • Relative value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{6d87171bba6f4050b787d1b57c438d25,
title = "The Korean spinal neurosurgery society; Are we reimbursed properly for spinal neurosurgical practices under the Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale service?",
abstract = "Objectives: The Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale (K-RBRVS) was introduced in 2001 as an alternative of the previous medical fee schedule. Unfortunately, most neurosurgeons are unfamiliar with the details of the K-RBRVS and how it affects the reimbursement rates for the surgical procedures we perform. We summarize the K-RBRVS in brief, and discuss on how the relative value (RV) of the spinal neurosurgical procedures have changed since the introduction in 2001. Methods: We analyzed the change of spinal procedure RVs since 2001, and compared it with the change of values in the brain neurosurgical procedures. RVs of 88 neurospinal procedures on the list of K-RBRVS were analyzed, while 24 procedures added during annual revisions were excluded. Results: During the past 15 years, RVs for spinal procedures have increased 62.8{\%}, which is not so different with the cumulative increase of consumer prices during this time period or the increase rate of 92.3{\%} for brain surgeries. When comparing the change of RVs in more complex procedures between spinal and brain neurosurgery, the increase rate was 125.3{\%} and 133{\%}, respectively. Conclusion: More effort of the society of spinal surgeons seems to be needed to get adequate reimbursement, as there have been some discrimination compared to brain surgeons in the increase of RVs. And considering the relative underestimation of spinal neurosurgeons′ labor, more objective measures of neurospinal surgeons′ work and productivity should be developed for impartial reimbursement.",
keywords = "Korean resource based relative value scale, Medical fee schedule, Neurosurgery, Reimbursement, Relative value",
author = "Kwon, {Woo Keun} and Joo-Han Kim and Moon, {Hong Joo} and Youn-Kwan Park",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3340/jkns.2016.0405.003",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "47--53",
journal = "Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society",
issn = "2005-3711",
publisher = "Daehan sin'gyeong oe'gwa haghoe",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Korean spinal neurosurgery society; Are we reimbursed properly for spinal neurosurgical practices under the Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale service?

AU - Kwon, Woo Keun

AU - Kim, Joo-Han

AU - Moon, Hong Joo

AU - Park, Youn-Kwan

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale (K-RBRVS) was introduced in 2001 as an alternative of the previous medical fee schedule. Unfortunately, most neurosurgeons are unfamiliar with the details of the K-RBRVS and how it affects the reimbursement rates for the surgical procedures we perform. We summarize the K-RBRVS in brief, and discuss on how the relative value (RV) of the spinal neurosurgical procedures have changed since the introduction in 2001. Methods: We analyzed the change of spinal procedure RVs since 2001, and compared it with the change of values in the brain neurosurgical procedures. RVs of 88 neurospinal procedures on the list of K-RBRVS were analyzed, while 24 procedures added during annual revisions were excluded. Results: During the past 15 years, RVs for spinal procedures have increased 62.8%, which is not so different with the cumulative increase of consumer prices during this time period or the increase rate of 92.3% for brain surgeries. When comparing the change of RVs in more complex procedures between spinal and brain neurosurgery, the increase rate was 125.3% and 133%, respectively. Conclusion: More effort of the society of spinal surgeons seems to be needed to get adequate reimbursement, as there have been some discrimination compared to brain surgeons in the increase of RVs. And considering the relative underestimation of spinal neurosurgeons′ labor, more objective measures of neurospinal surgeons′ work and productivity should be developed for impartial reimbursement.

AB - Objectives: The Korean Resource Based Relative Value Scale (K-RBRVS) was introduced in 2001 as an alternative of the previous medical fee schedule. Unfortunately, most neurosurgeons are unfamiliar with the details of the K-RBRVS and how it affects the reimbursement rates for the surgical procedures we perform. We summarize the K-RBRVS in brief, and discuss on how the relative value (RV) of the spinal neurosurgical procedures have changed since the introduction in 2001. Methods: We analyzed the change of spinal procedure RVs since 2001, and compared it with the change of values in the brain neurosurgical procedures. RVs of 88 neurospinal procedures on the list of K-RBRVS were analyzed, while 24 procedures added during annual revisions were excluded. Results: During the past 15 years, RVs for spinal procedures have increased 62.8%, which is not so different with the cumulative increase of consumer prices during this time period or the increase rate of 92.3% for brain surgeries. When comparing the change of RVs in more complex procedures between spinal and brain neurosurgery, the increase rate was 125.3% and 133%, respectively. Conclusion: More effort of the society of spinal surgeons seems to be needed to get adequate reimbursement, as there have been some discrimination compared to brain surgeons in the increase of RVs. And considering the relative underestimation of spinal neurosurgeons′ labor, more objective measures of neurospinal surgeons′ work and productivity should be developed for impartial reimbursement.

KW - Korean resource based relative value scale

KW - Medical fee schedule

KW - Neurosurgery

KW - Reimbursement

KW - Relative value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010369781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010369781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3340/jkns.2016.0405.003

DO - 10.3340/jkns.2016.0405.003

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 47

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

JF - Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

SN - 2005-3711

IS - 1

ER -