The need for novel informatics tools for integrating and planning research in molecular and cellular cognition

Alcino J. Silva, Klaus Muller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The sheer volume and complexity of publications in the biological sciences are straining traditional approaches to research planning. Nowhere is this problem more serious than in molecular and cellular cognition, since in this neuroscience field, researchers routinely use approaches and information from a variety of areas in neuroscience and other biology fields. Additionally, the multilevel integration process characteristic of this field involves the establishment of experimental connections between molecular, electrophysiological, behavioral, and even cognitive data. This multidisciplinary integration process requires strategies and approaches that originate in several different fields, which greatly increases the complexity and demands of this process. Although causal assertions, where phenomenon A is thought to contribute or relate to B, are at the center of this integration process and key to research in biology, there are currently no tools to help scientists keep track of the increasingly more complex network of causal connections they use when making research decisions. Here, we propose the development of semiautomated graphical and interactive tools to help neuroscientists and other biologists, including those working in molecular and cellular cognition, to track, map, and weight causal evidence in research papers. There is a great need for a concerted effort by biologists, computer scientists, and funding institutions to develop maps of causal information that would aid in integration of research findings and in experiment planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-498
Number of pages5
JournalLearning and Memory
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Informatics
Cognition
Research
Neurosciences
Biological Science Disciplines
Publications
Decision Making
Research Personnel
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

The need for novel informatics tools for integrating and planning research in molecular and cellular cognition. / Silva, Alcino J.; Muller, Klaus.

In: Learning and Memory, Vol. 22, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 494-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f193812d3e3042a1b50ab3e35c155ee4,
title = "The need for novel informatics tools for integrating and planning research in molecular and cellular cognition",
abstract = "The sheer volume and complexity of publications in the biological sciences are straining traditional approaches to research planning. Nowhere is this problem more serious than in molecular and cellular cognition, since in this neuroscience field, researchers routinely use approaches and information from a variety of areas in neuroscience and other biology fields. Additionally, the multilevel integration process characteristic of this field involves the establishment of experimental connections between molecular, electrophysiological, behavioral, and even cognitive data. This multidisciplinary integration process requires strategies and approaches that originate in several different fields, which greatly increases the complexity and demands of this process. Although causal assertions, where phenomenon A is thought to contribute or relate to B, are at the center of this integration process and key to research in biology, there are currently no tools to help scientists keep track of the increasingly more complex network of causal connections they use when making research decisions. Here, we propose the development of semiautomated graphical and interactive tools to help neuroscientists and other biologists, including those working in molecular and cellular cognition, to track, map, and weight causal evidence in research papers. There is a great need for a concerted effort by biologists, computer scientists, and funding institutions to develop maps of causal information that would aid in integration of research findings and in experiment planning.",
author = "Silva, {Alcino J.} and Klaus Muller",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1101/lm.029355.112",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "494--498",
journal = "Learning and Memory",
issn = "1072-0502",
publisher = "Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for novel informatics tools for integrating and planning research in molecular and cellular cognition

AU - Silva, Alcino J.

AU - Muller, Klaus

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The sheer volume and complexity of publications in the biological sciences are straining traditional approaches to research planning. Nowhere is this problem more serious than in molecular and cellular cognition, since in this neuroscience field, researchers routinely use approaches and information from a variety of areas in neuroscience and other biology fields. Additionally, the multilevel integration process characteristic of this field involves the establishment of experimental connections between molecular, electrophysiological, behavioral, and even cognitive data. This multidisciplinary integration process requires strategies and approaches that originate in several different fields, which greatly increases the complexity and demands of this process. Although causal assertions, where phenomenon A is thought to contribute or relate to B, are at the center of this integration process and key to research in biology, there are currently no tools to help scientists keep track of the increasingly more complex network of causal connections they use when making research decisions. Here, we propose the development of semiautomated graphical and interactive tools to help neuroscientists and other biologists, including those working in molecular and cellular cognition, to track, map, and weight causal evidence in research papers. There is a great need for a concerted effort by biologists, computer scientists, and funding institutions to develop maps of causal information that would aid in integration of research findings and in experiment planning.

AB - The sheer volume and complexity of publications in the biological sciences are straining traditional approaches to research planning. Nowhere is this problem more serious than in molecular and cellular cognition, since in this neuroscience field, researchers routinely use approaches and information from a variety of areas in neuroscience and other biology fields. Additionally, the multilevel integration process characteristic of this field involves the establishment of experimental connections between molecular, electrophysiological, behavioral, and even cognitive data. This multidisciplinary integration process requires strategies and approaches that originate in several different fields, which greatly increases the complexity and demands of this process. Although causal assertions, where phenomenon A is thought to contribute or relate to B, are at the center of this integration process and key to research in biology, there are currently no tools to help scientists keep track of the increasingly more complex network of causal connections they use when making research decisions. Here, we propose the development of semiautomated graphical and interactive tools to help neuroscientists and other biologists, including those working in molecular and cellular cognition, to track, map, and weight causal evidence in research papers. There is a great need for a concerted effort by biologists, computer scientists, and funding institutions to develop maps of causal information that would aid in integration of research findings and in experiment planning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942106255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942106255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1101/lm.029355.112

DO - 10.1101/lm.029355.112

M3 - Article

C2 - 26286658

AN - SCOPUS:84942106255

VL - 22

SP - 494

EP - 498

JO - Learning and Memory

JF - Learning and Memory

SN - 1072-0502

IS - 9

ER -