The public dialogue and conflict resolution skills of Korean physicians

Duck-Sun Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent conflict between the organization of medical professionals and the government agencies regarding health policy exemplified the incapability of doctors to resolve social conflicts. Doctors have shown strong dissent against a range of government healthcare policies. One policy that is at the center of this heated conflict is the cost containment measure of the national healthcare system. The healthcare professionals argue that the government policy was created in an undemocratic manner and is downright oppressive. However, the current opinion of the public is not supportive of the doctors, who are seen as self-interested and well-endowed. This disagreement among the public, government, and physicians is the source of huge contention in Korean society. The Korean medical professionals have been criticized on many grounds: they are self-interested; too focused on biomedical sciences as opposed to the holistic view on patients; lack a macro-level perspective on their actions and plans; and are isolating themselves from the general masses, treating themselves as a special class of professionals. These perceptions have led doctors' due and just claims for reimbursement for their efforts to be considered as greedy and excessive attempts to extract money in popular opinion. Whether these claims are true or not, doctors should attempt to correct these negative perceptions through a public dialogue. A concerted effort for social understanding and constructive relationshipbuilding between doctors and the general public is highly recommended. The current Korean post-graduate medical curriculum does not include any communication or conflict resolution components. Therefore, when societal conflict arises regarding healthcare or medicine, doctors are inadequately trained to resolve the issue. Efforts should be made to change medical education to better equip physicians with social and communication skills in order to amend this status quo. In order to take control of social situations and function as agents of change, doctors should attempt to build their capacity. When doctors are more adept at handling conflict resolution and leading a dialogue between the public and the professional society, then they will be enabled to achieve their aims.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1156-1159
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Korean Medical Association
Volume55
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Communication
Government Agencies
Public Opinion
Dissent and Disputes
Cost Control
Health Policy
Medical Education
Curriculum
Medicine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Conflict resolution
  • Health policy
  • Social capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The public dialogue and conflict resolution skills of Korean physicians. / Ahn, Duck-Sun.

In: Journal of the Korean Medical Association, Vol. 55, No. 12, 01.12.2012, p. 1156-1159.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{0b9edb5bc665479b867f0897b78940bd,
title = "The public dialogue and conflict resolution skills of Korean physicians",
abstract = "The recent conflict between the organization of medical professionals and the government agencies regarding health policy exemplified the incapability of doctors to resolve social conflicts. Doctors have shown strong dissent against a range of government healthcare policies. One policy that is at the center of this heated conflict is the cost containment measure of the national healthcare system. The healthcare professionals argue that the government policy was created in an undemocratic manner and is downright oppressive. However, the current opinion of the public is not supportive of the doctors, who are seen as self-interested and well-endowed. This disagreement among the public, government, and physicians is the source of huge contention in Korean society. The Korean medical professionals have been criticized on many grounds: they are self-interested; too focused on biomedical sciences as opposed to the holistic view on patients; lack a macro-level perspective on their actions and plans; and are isolating themselves from the general masses, treating themselves as a special class of professionals. These perceptions have led doctors' due and just claims for reimbursement for their efforts to be considered as greedy and excessive attempts to extract money in popular opinion. Whether these claims are true or not, doctors should attempt to correct these negative perceptions through a public dialogue. A concerted effort for social understanding and constructive relationshipbuilding between doctors and the general public is highly recommended. The current Korean post-graduate medical curriculum does not include any communication or conflict resolution components. Therefore, when societal conflict arises regarding healthcare or medicine, doctors are inadequately trained to resolve the issue. Efforts should be made to change medical education to better equip physicians with social and communication skills in order to amend this status quo. In order to take control of social situations and function as agents of change, doctors should attempt to build their capacity. When doctors are more adept at handling conflict resolution and leading a dialogue between the public and the professional society, then they will be enabled to achieve their aims.",
keywords = "Conflict resolution, Health policy, Social capacity",
author = "Duck-Sun Ahn",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1156",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1156--1159",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Medical Association",
issn = "1975-8456",
publisher = "Korean Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The public dialogue and conflict resolution skills of Korean physicians

AU - Ahn, Duck-Sun

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - The recent conflict between the organization of medical professionals and the government agencies regarding health policy exemplified the incapability of doctors to resolve social conflicts. Doctors have shown strong dissent against a range of government healthcare policies. One policy that is at the center of this heated conflict is the cost containment measure of the national healthcare system. The healthcare professionals argue that the government policy was created in an undemocratic manner and is downright oppressive. However, the current opinion of the public is not supportive of the doctors, who are seen as self-interested and well-endowed. This disagreement among the public, government, and physicians is the source of huge contention in Korean society. The Korean medical professionals have been criticized on many grounds: they are self-interested; too focused on biomedical sciences as opposed to the holistic view on patients; lack a macro-level perspective on their actions and plans; and are isolating themselves from the general masses, treating themselves as a special class of professionals. These perceptions have led doctors' due and just claims for reimbursement for their efforts to be considered as greedy and excessive attempts to extract money in popular opinion. Whether these claims are true or not, doctors should attempt to correct these negative perceptions through a public dialogue. A concerted effort for social understanding and constructive relationshipbuilding between doctors and the general public is highly recommended. The current Korean post-graduate medical curriculum does not include any communication or conflict resolution components. Therefore, when societal conflict arises regarding healthcare or medicine, doctors are inadequately trained to resolve the issue. Efforts should be made to change medical education to better equip physicians with social and communication skills in order to amend this status quo. In order to take control of social situations and function as agents of change, doctors should attempt to build their capacity. When doctors are more adept at handling conflict resolution and leading a dialogue between the public and the professional society, then they will be enabled to achieve their aims.

AB - The recent conflict between the organization of medical professionals and the government agencies regarding health policy exemplified the incapability of doctors to resolve social conflicts. Doctors have shown strong dissent against a range of government healthcare policies. One policy that is at the center of this heated conflict is the cost containment measure of the national healthcare system. The healthcare professionals argue that the government policy was created in an undemocratic manner and is downright oppressive. However, the current opinion of the public is not supportive of the doctors, who are seen as self-interested and well-endowed. This disagreement among the public, government, and physicians is the source of huge contention in Korean society. The Korean medical professionals have been criticized on many grounds: they are self-interested; too focused on biomedical sciences as opposed to the holistic view on patients; lack a macro-level perspective on their actions and plans; and are isolating themselves from the general masses, treating themselves as a special class of professionals. These perceptions have led doctors' due and just claims for reimbursement for their efforts to be considered as greedy and excessive attempts to extract money in popular opinion. Whether these claims are true or not, doctors should attempt to correct these negative perceptions through a public dialogue. A concerted effort for social understanding and constructive relationshipbuilding between doctors and the general public is highly recommended. The current Korean post-graduate medical curriculum does not include any communication or conflict resolution components. Therefore, when societal conflict arises regarding healthcare or medicine, doctors are inadequately trained to resolve the issue. Efforts should be made to change medical education to better equip physicians with social and communication skills in order to amend this status quo. In order to take control of social situations and function as agents of change, doctors should attempt to build their capacity. When doctors are more adept at handling conflict resolution and leading a dialogue between the public and the professional society, then they will be enabled to achieve their aims.

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Health policy

KW - Social capacity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872146151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872146151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1156

DO - 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.12.1156

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84872146151

VL - 55

SP - 1156

EP - 1159

JO - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

SN - 1975-8456

IS - 12

ER -