The role of sample collection method and the bias between different standard matrices in the determination of volatile organic compounds in air

Ki Hyun Kim, A. Anthwal, Jong Ryeul Sohn, Gwi Suk Heo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the relative bias between two types of sampling methods for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), i. e., sorbent tube vs. bag sampling methods and between different standard phases. For the purpose of this comparative study, gaseous standards containing three major aromatic VOCs (benzene, toluene, and xylene-commonly called BTX) were analyzed by thermo-desorption gas chromatography (TD-GC) with flame ionization detector. According to our findings, the relative response of target compounds can be smaller in the bag method than in the tube method. Although the relative bias varies with the sample transfer conditions for the TD, the mean slope values of the former are smaller by up to 20% relative to the latter, possibly due to sorptive loss on the bag sampler. In addition, the effects of different standard matrices (i. e. liquid and gas phases) were also examined using the sorbent tube method. The results indicated that the slope values of the gas-phase standard were smaller by half (about 43-56%) than the liquid-phase standard. Consequently, information concerning the extent of relative bias between sampling methods (e. g., bag and tube) or standard matrices (e. g., gas and liquid) should be considered as one of the key factors in TD applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-90
Number of pages8
JournalMicrochimica Acta
Volume170
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Volatile Organic Compounds
Air
Gases
Sampling
Sorbents
Liquids
Xylenes
Toluene
Benzene
Gas chromatography
Ionization
Desorption
Detectors

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Tedlar bag
  • Thermal desorption
  • Tube sampling
  • Volatile organic compounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

The role of sample collection method and the bias between different standard matrices in the determination of volatile organic compounds in air. / Kim, Ki Hyun; Anthwal, A.; Sohn, Jong Ryeul; Heo, Gwi Suk.

In: Microchimica Acta, Vol. 170, No. 1, 01.08.2010, p. 83-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6541c96117604e069b16332afba2e652,
title = "The role of sample collection method and the bias between different standard matrices in the determination of volatile organic compounds in air",
abstract = "This study was undertaken to assess the relative bias between two types of sampling methods for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), i. e., sorbent tube vs. bag sampling methods and between different standard phases. For the purpose of this comparative study, gaseous standards containing three major aromatic VOCs (benzene, toluene, and xylene-commonly called BTX) were analyzed by thermo-desorption gas chromatography (TD-GC) with flame ionization detector. According to our findings, the relative response of target compounds can be smaller in the bag method than in the tube method. Although the relative bias varies with the sample transfer conditions for the TD, the mean slope values of the former are smaller by up to 20{\%} relative to the latter, possibly due to sorptive loss on the bag sampler. In addition, the effects of different standard matrices (i. e. liquid and gas phases) were also examined using the sorbent tube method. The results indicated that the slope values of the gas-phase standard were smaller by half (about 43-56{\%}) than the liquid-phase standard. Consequently, information concerning the extent of relative bias between sampling methods (e. g., bag and tube) or standard matrices (e. g., gas and liquid) should be considered as one of the key factors in TD applications.",
keywords = "Calibration, Tedlar bag, Thermal desorption, Tube sampling, Volatile organic compounds",
author = "Kim, {Ki Hyun} and A. Anthwal and Sohn, {Jong Ryeul} and Heo, {Gwi Suk}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00604-010-0394-1",
language = "English",
volume = "170",
pages = "83--90",
journal = "Mikrochimica Acta",
issn = "0026-3672",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of sample collection method and the bias between different standard matrices in the determination of volatile organic compounds in air

AU - Kim, Ki Hyun

AU - Anthwal, A.

AU - Sohn, Jong Ryeul

AU - Heo, Gwi Suk

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - This study was undertaken to assess the relative bias between two types of sampling methods for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), i. e., sorbent tube vs. bag sampling methods and between different standard phases. For the purpose of this comparative study, gaseous standards containing three major aromatic VOCs (benzene, toluene, and xylene-commonly called BTX) were analyzed by thermo-desorption gas chromatography (TD-GC) with flame ionization detector. According to our findings, the relative response of target compounds can be smaller in the bag method than in the tube method. Although the relative bias varies with the sample transfer conditions for the TD, the mean slope values of the former are smaller by up to 20% relative to the latter, possibly due to sorptive loss on the bag sampler. In addition, the effects of different standard matrices (i. e. liquid and gas phases) were also examined using the sorbent tube method. The results indicated that the slope values of the gas-phase standard were smaller by half (about 43-56%) than the liquid-phase standard. Consequently, information concerning the extent of relative bias between sampling methods (e. g., bag and tube) or standard matrices (e. g., gas and liquid) should be considered as one of the key factors in TD applications.

AB - This study was undertaken to assess the relative bias between two types of sampling methods for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), i. e., sorbent tube vs. bag sampling methods and between different standard phases. For the purpose of this comparative study, gaseous standards containing three major aromatic VOCs (benzene, toluene, and xylene-commonly called BTX) were analyzed by thermo-desorption gas chromatography (TD-GC) with flame ionization detector. According to our findings, the relative response of target compounds can be smaller in the bag method than in the tube method. Although the relative bias varies with the sample transfer conditions for the TD, the mean slope values of the former are smaller by up to 20% relative to the latter, possibly due to sorptive loss on the bag sampler. In addition, the effects of different standard matrices (i. e. liquid and gas phases) were also examined using the sorbent tube method. The results indicated that the slope values of the gas-phase standard were smaller by half (about 43-56%) than the liquid-phase standard. Consequently, information concerning the extent of relative bias between sampling methods (e. g., bag and tube) or standard matrices (e. g., gas and liquid) should be considered as one of the key factors in TD applications.

KW - Calibration

KW - Tedlar bag

KW - Thermal desorption

KW - Tube sampling

KW - Volatile organic compounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954623144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954623144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00604-010-0394-1

DO - 10.1007/s00604-010-0394-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954623144

VL - 170

SP - 83

EP - 90

JO - Mikrochimica Acta

JF - Mikrochimica Acta

SN - 0026-3672

IS - 1

ER -