TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of two different collagen membranes for dehiscence defect around implants in humans
AU - Lee, Dong Woon
AU - Kim, Kyeong Taek
AU - Joo, Yon Soo
AU - Yoo, Mi Kyung
AU - Yu, Jeoung A.
AU - Ryu, Jae Jun
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of 2 types of collagen membranes (cross-linked vs noncross-linked) used in conjunction with autogenous or allogenic bone followed by xenogeneic bone particles for dehiscence defect around implants in humans. Experimental groups were divided into 2 groups: Group CL (cross-linked, Ossix Plus, n = 24 implants, 16 patients) and Group NCL (noncross-linked, Bio-Gide, n = 25 implants, 18 patients). At the time of implant insertion and uncovery surgery, measurements of the dehiscence bony height, width, and surface area were made. Before applying the membrane to defects, guided bone regeneration was performed. Because it is difficult to measure the degree of exposure, early exposed cases were excluded from the result analysis. The mean percentage gain of the dehiscence defect and the mean marginal bone reduction value of follow-up radiograph did not show statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Both membranes exhibited satisfactory results on dehiscence defects. As a result, our authors concluded the success of guided bone regeneration was performed simultaneously for dehiscence defects around the implant, regardless whether collagen membranes were cross-linked or noncross-linked.
AB - The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of 2 types of collagen membranes (cross-linked vs noncross-linked) used in conjunction with autogenous or allogenic bone followed by xenogeneic bone particles for dehiscence defect around implants in humans. Experimental groups were divided into 2 groups: Group CL (cross-linked, Ossix Plus, n = 24 implants, 16 patients) and Group NCL (noncross-linked, Bio-Gide, n = 25 implants, 18 patients). At the time of implant insertion and uncovery surgery, measurements of the dehiscence bony height, width, and surface area were made. Before applying the membrane to defects, guided bone regeneration was performed. Because it is difficult to measure the degree of exposure, early exposed cases were excluded from the result analysis. The mean percentage gain of the dehiscence defect and the mean marginal bone reduction value of follow-up radiograph did not show statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Both membranes exhibited satisfactory results on dehiscence defects. As a result, our authors concluded the success of guided bone regeneration was performed simultaneously for dehiscence defects around the implant, regardless whether collagen membranes were cross-linked or noncross-linked.
KW - Collagen membrane
KW - Cross-linked
KW - Dehiscence
KW - Guided bone regeneration
KW - Noncross-linking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939528386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939528386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00214
DO - 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00214
M3 - Article
C2 - 24372514
AN - SCOPUS:84939528386
SN - 0160-6972
VL - 41
SP - 445
EP - 449
JO - Journal of Oral Implantology
JF - Journal of Oral Implantology
IS - 4
ER -