The sensitivity of species distribution modeling to scale differences

Wonkyong Song, Eunyoung Kim, Dongkun Lee, Moungjin Lee, Seong Woo Jeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Species distribution modeling is one of the most effective habitat analysis methods for wildlife conservation. We evaluated the sensitivity of species distribution modeling to different grain sizes and extent sizes from 30m to 4950m using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling. The grain size represents a unit for analysis, whereas the extent size defines the scope of the analysis in a way that reflects the environmental data for the area in which the species of interest occurs. We compared the resulting suitability indexes and habitat areas based on two approaches. The first approach increases the extent size for a fixed grain size. The second approach increases the grain size and the extent size by equal amounts. The suitability index based on the first approach (R2=0.34) was greater than the suitability index based on the second approach (R2=0.89). The first approach was fitted to a logarithmic function with a critical point at approximately 0.5km, converging to about 0.76. In contrast, the second approach showed a linear decrease to values less than 0.5. The distribution of habitat area found with the second method (R2=0.87) was broader than that found with the first method (R2=0.63). The relationship between the extent size and the landscape index of the first method can be displayed as a power-law graph with a critical point of 0.5km. The method of expanding extent size has greater accuracy, although the time that it requires for data processing is long. The results of this study suggest that the maximum grain size should be approximately 1.5km. If the grain size is greater than 1.5km, the accuracy of the habitat suitability index decreases below 0.6, and the predicted habitat suitability increases dramatically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume248
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

grain size
modeling
habitat
distribution
nature conservation
entropy
power law
index
method
analysis

Keywords

  • Analysis range
  • Analysis units
  • Habitat suitability
  • MaxEnt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modelling

Cite this

The sensitivity of species distribution modeling to scale differences. / Song, Wonkyong; Kim, Eunyoung; Lee, Dongkun; Lee, Moungjin; Jeon, Seong Woo.

In: Ecological Modelling, Vol. 248, 01.01.2013, p. 113-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Song, Wonkyong ; Kim, Eunyoung ; Lee, Dongkun ; Lee, Moungjin ; Jeon, Seong Woo. / The sensitivity of species distribution modeling to scale differences. In: Ecological Modelling. 2013 ; Vol. 248. pp. 113-118.
@article{a338cd63a94445bca2f01f9b842567c1,
title = "The sensitivity of species distribution modeling to scale differences",
abstract = "Species distribution modeling is one of the most effective habitat analysis methods for wildlife conservation. We evaluated the sensitivity of species distribution modeling to different grain sizes and extent sizes from 30m to 4950m using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling. The grain size represents a unit for analysis, whereas the extent size defines the scope of the analysis in a way that reflects the environmental data for the area in which the species of interest occurs. We compared the resulting suitability indexes and habitat areas based on two approaches. The first approach increases the extent size for a fixed grain size. The second approach increases the grain size and the extent size by equal amounts. The suitability index based on the first approach (R2=0.34) was greater than the suitability index based on the second approach (R2=0.89). The first approach was fitted to a logarithmic function with a critical point at approximately 0.5km, converging to about 0.76. In contrast, the second approach showed a linear decrease to values less than 0.5. The distribution of habitat area found with the second method (R2=0.87) was broader than that found with the first method (R2=0.63). The relationship between the extent size and the landscape index of the first method can be displayed as a power-law graph with a critical point of 0.5km. The method of expanding extent size has greater accuracy, although the time that it requires for data processing is long. The results of this study suggest that the maximum grain size should be approximately 1.5km. If the grain size is greater than 1.5km, the accuracy of the habitat suitability index decreases below 0.6, and the predicted habitat suitability increases dramatically.",
keywords = "Analysis range, Analysis units, Habitat suitability, MaxEnt",
author = "Wonkyong Song and Eunyoung Kim and Dongkun Lee and Moungjin Lee and Jeon, {Seong Woo}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.012",
language = "English",
volume = "248",
pages = "113--118",
journal = "Ecological Modelling",
issn = "0304-3800",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sensitivity of species distribution modeling to scale differences

AU - Song, Wonkyong

AU - Kim, Eunyoung

AU - Lee, Dongkun

AU - Lee, Moungjin

AU - Jeon, Seong Woo

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Species distribution modeling is one of the most effective habitat analysis methods for wildlife conservation. We evaluated the sensitivity of species distribution modeling to different grain sizes and extent sizes from 30m to 4950m using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling. The grain size represents a unit for analysis, whereas the extent size defines the scope of the analysis in a way that reflects the environmental data for the area in which the species of interest occurs. We compared the resulting suitability indexes and habitat areas based on two approaches. The first approach increases the extent size for a fixed grain size. The second approach increases the grain size and the extent size by equal amounts. The suitability index based on the first approach (R2=0.34) was greater than the suitability index based on the second approach (R2=0.89). The first approach was fitted to a logarithmic function with a critical point at approximately 0.5km, converging to about 0.76. In contrast, the second approach showed a linear decrease to values less than 0.5. The distribution of habitat area found with the second method (R2=0.87) was broader than that found with the first method (R2=0.63). The relationship between the extent size and the landscape index of the first method can be displayed as a power-law graph with a critical point of 0.5km. The method of expanding extent size has greater accuracy, although the time that it requires for data processing is long. The results of this study suggest that the maximum grain size should be approximately 1.5km. If the grain size is greater than 1.5km, the accuracy of the habitat suitability index decreases below 0.6, and the predicted habitat suitability increases dramatically.

AB - Species distribution modeling is one of the most effective habitat analysis methods for wildlife conservation. We evaluated the sensitivity of species distribution modeling to different grain sizes and extent sizes from 30m to 4950m using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling. The grain size represents a unit for analysis, whereas the extent size defines the scope of the analysis in a way that reflects the environmental data for the area in which the species of interest occurs. We compared the resulting suitability indexes and habitat areas based on two approaches. The first approach increases the extent size for a fixed grain size. The second approach increases the grain size and the extent size by equal amounts. The suitability index based on the first approach (R2=0.34) was greater than the suitability index based on the second approach (R2=0.89). The first approach was fitted to a logarithmic function with a critical point at approximately 0.5km, converging to about 0.76. In contrast, the second approach showed a linear decrease to values less than 0.5. The distribution of habitat area found with the second method (R2=0.87) was broader than that found with the first method (R2=0.63). The relationship between the extent size and the landscape index of the first method can be displayed as a power-law graph with a critical point of 0.5km. The method of expanding extent size has greater accuracy, although the time that it requires for data processing is long. The results of this study suggest that the maximum grain size should be approximately 1.5km. If the grain size is greater than 1.5km, the accuracy of the habitat suitability index decreases below 0.6, and the predicted habitat suitability increases dramatically.

KW - Analysis range

KW - Analysis units

KW - Habitat suitability

KW - MaxEnt

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868551232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868551232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.012

M3 - Article

VL - 248

SP - 113

EP - 118

JO - Ecological Modelling

JF - Ecological Modelling

SN - 0304-3800

ER -