THE VALIDITY of the MOOD DISORDER QUESTIONNAIRE for SCREENING BIPOLAR DISORDER: A META-ANALYSIS

Hee Ryung Wang, Young Sup Woo, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Il Min Ahn, Hyun Jung Kim, Won Myong Bahk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis to review the diagnostic accuracy of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) among patients with mood disorders. We used a bivariate random effects model to calculate summary sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-one studies were included. At the standard or modified cutoff value of 7, summary sensitivity was.62 and summary specificity was.85. When we pooled 11 studies including both patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and those with unipolar depression, the summary sensitivity was.76 and summary specificity was.81. However, among the six studies that excluded patients with known BD, the summary sensitivity was significantly reduced to.37 and summary specificity was.88. There were no significant differences on the diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ between studies from Eastern and Western countries after adjusting for various clinical correlates. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ was relatively good. However, when the MDQ is applied among patients with depression without previous diagnoses of BD, its sensitivity was significantly reduced. This suggests that when the MDQ is applied among this population, its optimal cutoff value should be adjusted to enhance its sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-538
Number of pages12
JournalDepression and Anxiety
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Mood Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Meta-Analysis
Depressive Disorder
Surveys and Questionnaires
Depression
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population

Keywords

  • assessment/diagnosis
  • bipolar disorder
  • depression
  • measurement/psychometrics
  • mood disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

THE VALIDITY of the MOOD DISORDER QUESTIONNAIRE for SCREENING BIPOLAR DISORDER : A META-ANALYSIS. / Wang, Hee Ryung; Woo, Young Sup; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Ahn, Il Min; Kim, Hyun Jung; Bahk, Won Myong.

In: Depression and Anxiety, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.07.2015, p. 527-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Wang, Hee Ryung ; Woo, Young Sup ; Ahn, Hyeong Sik ; Ahn, Il Min ; Kim, Hyun Jung ; Bahk, Won Myong. / THE VALIDITY of the MOOD DISORDER QUESTIONNAIRE for SCREENING BIPOLAR DISORDER : A META-ANALYSIS. In: Depression and Anxiety. 2015 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 527-538.
@article{8e9151c25a1346d7bd907926bc508867,
title = "THE VALIDITY of the MOOD DISORDER QUESTIONNAIRE for SCREENING BIPOLAR DISORDER: A META-ANALYSIS",
abstract = "We conducted a meta-analysis to review the diagnostic accuracy of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) among patients with mood disorders. We used a bivariate random effects model to calculate summary sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-one studies were included. At the standard or modified cutoff value of 7, summary sensitivity was.62 and summary specificity was.85. When we pooled 11 studies including both patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and those with unipolar depression, the summary sensitivity was.76 and summary specificity was.81. However, among the six studies that excluded patients with known BD, the summary sensitivity was significantly reduced to.37 and summary specificity was.88. There were no significant differences on the diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ between studies from Eastern and Western countries after adjusting for various clinical correlates. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ was relatively good. However, when the MDQ is applied among patients with depression without previous diagnoses of BD, its sensitivity was significantly reduced. This suggests that when the MDQ is applied among this population, its optimal cutoff value should be adjusted to enhance its sensitivity.",
keywords = "assessment/diagnosis, bipolar disorder, depression, measurement/psychometrics, mood disorders",
author = "Wang, {Hee Ryung} and Woo, {Young Sup} and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Ahn, {Il Min} and Kim, {Hyun Jung} and Bahk, {Won Myong}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/da.22374",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "527--538",
journal = "Depression and Anxiety",
issn = "1091-4269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - THE VALIDITY of the MOOD DISORDER QUESTIONNAIRE for SCREENING BIPOLAR DISORDER

T2 - A META-ANALYSIS

AU - Wang, Hee Ryung

AU - Woo, Young Sup

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - Ahn, Il Min

AU - Kim, Hyun Jung

AU - Bahk, Won Myong

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - We conducted a meta-analysis to review the diagnostic accuracy of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) among patients with mood disorders. We used a bivariate random effects model to calculate summary sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-one studies were included. At the standard or modified cutoff value of 7, summary sensitivity was.62 and summary specificity was.85. When we pooled 11 studies including both patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and those with unipolar depression, the summary sensitivity was.76 and summary specificity was.81. However, among the six studies that excluded patients with known BD, the summary sensitivity was significantly reduced to.37 and summary specificity was.88. There were no significant differences on the diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ between studies from Eastern and Western countries after adjusting for various clinical correlates. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ was relatively good. However, when the MDQ is applied among patients with depression without previous diagnoses of BD, its sensitivity was significantly reduced. This suggests that when the MDQ is applied among this population, its optimal cutoff value should be adjusted to enhance its sensitivity.

AB - We conducted a meta-analysis to review the diagnostic accuracy of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) among patients with mood disorders. We used a bivariate random effects model to calculate summary sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-one studies were included. At the standard or modified cutoff value of 7, summary sensitivity was.62 and summary specificity was.85. When we pooled 11 studies including both patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and those with unipolar depression, the summary sensitivity was.76 and summary specificity was.81. However, among the six studies that excluded patients with known BD, the summary sensitivity was significantly reduced to.37 and summary specificity was.88. There were no significant differences on the diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ between studies from Eastern and Western countries after adjusting for various clinical correlates. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the MDQ was relatively good. However, when the MDQ is applied among patients with depression without previous diagnoses of BD, its sensitivity was significantly reduced. This suggests that when the MDQ is applied among this population, its optimal cutoff value should be adjusted to enhance its sensitivity.

KW - assessment/diagnosis

KW - bipolar disorder

KW - depression

KW - measurement/psychometrics

KW - mood disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934440464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934440464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/da.22374

DO - 10.1002/da.22374

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26010478

AN - SCOPUS:84934440464

VL - 32

SP - 527

EP - 538

JO - Depression and Anxiety

JF - Depression and Anxiety

SN - 1091-4269

IS - 7

ER -