Thermal comfort, energy and cost impacts of PMV control considering individual metabolic rate variations in residential building

Sung Hyup Hong, Jong Man Lee, Jin Woo Moon, Kwang Ho Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To date, most of the indoor environment control is based on the dry-bulb air temperature, which is one of the simplified control methods having the limitation to truly represent the thermal comfort of individual occupants. A variety of factors affect the thermal comfort such as dry-bulb air temperature, humidity, air movement, radiation, clothing insulation, and metabolic activity level. In this circumstance, this study investigated the effects of considering hourly metabolic rate variations for predicted mean vote (PMV) control on the actual thermal load, energy usage, and life cycle cost (LCC). The case adopting PMV control taking the hourly metabolic rate into account was comparatively analyzed against the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control, using a detailed simulation technique after the validation process. As a result, when the activity state of the occupant is house cleaning in the summer, the indoor temperature decreases rapidly due to the high amount of activity. It requires a temperature that is 11.7 °C and 9.7 °C lower than the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control method, respectively, and generally forms a higher indoor air temperature than the conventional control method after 7 p.m. This means the difference in temperature to satisfy the comfort of the occupant according to the amount of activity, and during winter as opposed to summer, was found to form a lower indoor air temperature than the conventional temperature control. In case of annual boiler gas consumption, PMV control showed 7.3% less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control and showed 28.8% less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control for annual cooling electricity consumption. Considering the cooling and heating energy reduction rate and the initial installation cost of measuring equipment for real-time metabolic rate and PMV measurement, a payback period of approximately 4.15 years was required.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1767
JournalEnergies
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thermal comfort
Vote
Temperature Control
Costs
Temperature control
Air
Energy
Annual
Energy Consumption
Cooling
Temperature
Life Cycle Cost
Measuring instruments
Energy utilization
Cleaning
Humidity
p.m.
Electricity
Heating
Thermal load

Keywords

  • Energy consumption
  • EnergyPlus
  • Life cycle cost (LCC)
  • Metabolic rates
  • Predicted mean vote (PMV)
  • Thermal comfort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Control and Optimization
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Thermal comfort, energy and cost impacts of PMV control considering individual metabolic rate variations in residential building. / Hong, Sung Hyup; Lee, Jong Man; Moon, Jin Woo; Lee, Kwang Ho.

In: Energies, Vol. 11, No. 7, 1767, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{20cfdda22704464ca2b2b068a993f76b,
title = "Thermal comfort, energy and cost impacts of PMV control considering individual metabolic rate variations in residential building",
abstract = "To date, most of the indoor environment control is based on the dry-bulb air temperature, which is one of the simplified control methods having the limitation to truly represent the thermal comfort of individual occupants. A variety of factors affect the thermal comfort such as dry-bulb air temperature, humidity, air movement, radiation, clothing insulation, and metabolic activity level. In this circumstance, this study investigated the effects of considering hourly metabolic rate variations for predicted mean vote (PMV) control on the actual thermal load, energy usage, and life cycle cost (LCC). The case adopting PMV control taking the hourly metabolic rate into account was comparatively analyzed against the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control, using a detailed simulation technique after the validation process. As a result, when the activity state of the occupant is house cleaning in the summer, the indoor temperature decreases rapidly due to the high amount of activity. It requires a temperature that is 11.7 °C and 9.7 °C lower than the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control method, respectively, and generally forms a higher indoor air temperature than the conventional control method after 7 p.m. This means the difference in temperature to satisfy the comfort of the occupant according to the amount of activity, and during winter as opposed to summer, was found to form a lower indoor air temperature than the conventional temperature control. In case of annual boiler gas consumption, PMV control showed 7.3{\%} less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control and showed 28.8{\%} less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control for annual cooling electricity consumption. Considering the cooling and heating energy reduction rate and the initial installation cost of measuring equipment for real-time metabolic rate and PMV measurement, a payback period of approximately 4.15 years was required.",
keywords = "Energy consumption, EnergyPlus, Life cycle cost (LCC), Metabolic rates, Predicted mean vote (PMV), Thermal comfort",
author = "Hong, {Sung Hyup} and Lee, {Jong Man} and Moon, {Jin Woo} and Lee, {Kwang Ho}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/en11071767",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Energies",
issn = "1996-1073",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermal comfort, energy and cost impacts of PMV control considering individual metabolic rate variations in residential building

AU - Hong, Sung Hyup

AU - Lee, Jong Man

AU - Moon, Jin Woo

AU - Lee, Kwang Ho

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - To date, most of the indoor environment control is based on the dry-bulb air temperature, which is one of the simplified control methods having the limitation to truly represent the thermal comfort of individual occupants. A variety of factors affect the thermal comfort such as dry-bulb air temperature, humidity, air movement, radiation, clothing insulation, and metabolic activity level. In this circumstance, this study investigated the effects of considering hourly metabolic rate variations for predicted mean vote (PMV) control on the actual thermal load, energy usage, and life cycle cost (LCC). The case adopting PMV control taking the hourly metabolic rate into account was comparatively analyzed against the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control, using a detailed simulation technique after the validation process. As a result, when the activity state of the occupant is house cleaning in the summer, the indoor temperature decreases rapidly due to the high amount of activity. It requires a temperature that is 11.7 °C and 9.7 °C lower than the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control method, respectively, and generally forms a higher indoor air temperature than the conventional control method after 7 p.m. This means the difference in temperature to satisfy the comfort of the occupant according to the amount of activity, and during winter as opposed to summer, was found to form a lower indoor air temperature than the conventional temperature control. In case of annual boiler gas consumption, PMV control showed 7.3% less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control and showed 28.8% less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control for annual cooling electricity consumption. Considering the cooling and heating energy reduction rate and the initial installation cost of measuring equipment for real-time metabolic rate and PMV measurement, a payback period of approximately 4.15 years was required.

AB - To date, most of the indoor environment control is based on the dry-bulb air temperature, which is one of the simplified control methods having the limitation to truly represent the thermal comfort of individual occupants. A variety of factors affect the thermal comfort such as dry-bulb air temperature, humidity, air movement, radiation, clothing insulation, and metabolic activity level. In this circumstance, this study investigated the effects of considering hourly metabolic rate variations for predicted mean vote (PMV) control on the actual thermal load, energy usage, and life cycle cost (LCC). The case adopting PMV control taking the hourly metabolic rate into account was comparatively analyzed against the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control, using a detailed simulation technique after the validation process. As a result, when the activity state of the occupant is house cleaning in the summer, the indoor temperature decreases rapidly due to the high amount of activity. It requires a temperature that is 11.7 °C and 9.7 °C lower than the conventional dry-bulb air temperature control method, respectively, and generally forms a higher indoor air temperature than the conventional control method after 7 p.m. This means the difference in temperature to satisfy the comfort of the occupant according to the amount of activity, and during winter as opposed to summer, was found to form a lower indoor air temperature than the conventional temperature control. In case of annual boiler gas consumption, PMV control showed 7.3% less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control and showed 28.8% less energy consumption than the dry-bulb air temperature control for annual cooling electricity consumption. Considering the cooling and heating energy reduction rate and the initial installation cost of measuring equipment for real-time metabolic rate and PMV measurement, a payback period of approximately 4.15 years was required.

KW - Energy consumption

KW - EnergyPlus

KW - Life cycle cost (LCC)

KW - Metabolic rates

KW - Predicted mean vote (PMV)

KW - Thermal comfort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051224702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051224702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/en11071767

DO - 10.3390/en11071767

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051224702

VL - 11

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 7

M1 - 1767

ER -