Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia

So Yeon Bae, Jin Young Park, Il Do Jeong, Hae-Young Kim, Ji Hwan Kim, Woong Chul Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and analyze the three-dimensional marginal and internal fit of PEKK and zirconia copings. Methods: Two acrylic models of the right maxillary canine, first molar were fabricated as master dies and duplicated by one-step dual viscosity impressions. Five stone replicas from each model were digitized with a blue-light scanner and copings were machined from Pekkton and Zirconia blanks. The inner surface of all the copings and two original acrylic models were digitized by a highly accurate optical scanner. By superimposing the digitized coping data with the CAD-reference die three-dimensionally, visual fit-discrepancies were drawn by calculating the root mean square (RMS) and visualized on a color-difference map. Each calculated RMS-value was statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. In addition, Student's . t-test was conducted in order to verify the significance (α=.05) of fit-discrepancies based on the type of abutment tooth and the materials. Results: Mean RMS-values for marginal fit (internal fit) ranged from 51.64. ±. 1.5 (36.12. ±. 1.34) to 69.62. ±. 8.11 (41.6. ±. 1.63). μm. Differences in marginal fit (canine: . P=.001; molar: . P=.047) and internal fit (canine: . P=.017; molar: . P=.046) were statistically significant.The results of the 3-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences in the RMS values of the two groups for the material (P . <. .001), the types of the abutment tooth (P . <. .001), and the measured region (P . <. .001). Conclusions: The marginal and internal fit of both PEKK and zirconia copings of both canine and molar were within the clinically acceptable range. However, the PEKK presented better fitness compared with the zirconia.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Prosthodontic Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016 Mar 2

Fingerprint

Canidae
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Viscosity
Color
Students
Light
zirconium oxide

Keywords

  • Internal fit
  • Marginal fit
  • PEKK
  • Three-dimensional analysis
  • Zirconia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. / Bae, So Yeon; Park, Jin Young; Jeong, Il Do; Kim, Hae-Young; Kim, Ji Hwan; Kim, Woong Chul.

In: Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 02.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ab567bd23d94ac090817f68d87f28d0,
title = "Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and analyze the three-dimensional marginal and internal fit of PEKK and zirconia copings. Methods: Two acrylic models of the right maxillary canine, first molar were fabricated as master dies and duplicated by one-step dual viscosity impressions. Five stone replicas from each model were digitized with a blue-light scanner and copings were machined from Pekkton and Zirconia blanks. The inner surface of all the copings and two original acrylic models were digitized by a highly accurate optical scanner. By superimposing the digitized coping data with the CAD-reference die three-dimensionally, visual fit-discrepancies were drawn by calculating the root mean square (RMS) and visualized on a color-difference map. Each calculated RMS-value was statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. In addition, Student's . t-test was conducted in order to verify the significance (α=.05) of fit-discrepancies based on the type of abutment tooth and the materials. Results: Mean RMS-values for marginal fit (internal fit) ranged from 51.64. ±. 1.5 (36.12. ±. 1.34) to 69.62. ±. 8.11 (41.6. ±. 1.63). μm. Differences in marginal fit (canine: . P=.001; molar: . P=.047) and internal fit (canine: . P=.017; molar: . P=.046) were statistically significant.The results of the 3-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences in the RMS values of the two groups for the material (P . <. .001), the types of the abutment tooth (P . <. .001), and the measured region (P . <. .001). Conclusions: The marginal and internal fit of both PEKK and zirconia copings of both canine and molar were within the clinically acceptable range. However, the PEKK presented better fitness compared with the zirconia.",
keywords = "Internal fit, Marginal fit, PEKK, Three-dimensional analysis, Zirconia",
author = "Bae, {So Yeon} and Park, {Jin Young} and Jeong, {Il Do} and Hae-Young Kim and Kim, {Ji Hwan} and Kim, {Woong Chul}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontic Research",
issn = "1883-1958",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia

AU - Bae, So Yeon

AU - Park, Jin Young

AU - Jeong, Il Do

AU - Kim, Hae-Young

AU - Kim, Ji Hwan

AU - Kim, Woong Chul

PY - 2016/3/2

Y1 - 2016/3/2

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and analyze the three-dimensional marginal and internal fit of PEKK and zirconia copings. Methods: Two acrylic models of the right maxillary canine, first molar were fabricated as master dies and duplicated by one-step dual viscosity impressions. Five stone replicas from each model were digitized with a blue-light scanner and copings were machined from Pekkton and Zirconia blanks. The inner surface of all the copings and two original acrylic models were digitized by a highly accurate optical scanner. By superimposing the digitized coping data with the CAD-reference die three-dimensionally, visual fit-discrepancies were drawn by calculating the root mean square (RMS) and visualized on a color-difference map. Each calculated RMS-value was statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. In addition, Student's . t-test was conducted in order to verify the significance (α=.05) of fit-discrepancies based on the type of abutment tooth and the materials. Results: Mean RMS-values for marginal fit (internal fit) ranged from 51.64. ±. 1.5 (36.12. ±. 1.34) to 69.62. ±. 8.11 (41.6. ±. 1.63). μm. Differences in marginal fit (canine: . P=.001; molar: . P=.047) and internal fit (canine: . P=.017; molar: . P=.046) were statistically significant.The results of the 3-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences in the RMS values of the two groups for the material (P . <. .001), the types of the abutment tooth (P . <. .001), and the measured region (P . <. .001). Conclusions: The marginal and internal fit of both PEKK and zirconia copings of both canine and molar were within the clinically acceptable range. However, the PEKK presented better fitness compared with the zirconia.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and analyze the three-dimensional marginal and internal fit of PEKK and zirconia copings. Methods: Two acrylic models of the right maxillary canine, first molar were fabricated as master dies and duplicated by one-step dual viscosity impressions. Five stone replicas from each model were digitized with a blue-light scanner and copings were machined from Pekkton and Zirconia blanks. The inner surface of all the copings and two original acrylic models were digitized by a highly accurate optical scanner. By superimposing the digitized coping data with the CAD-reference die three-dimensionally, visual fit-discrepancies were drawn by calculating the root mean square (RMS) and visualized on a color-difference map. Each calculated RMS-value was statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA. In addition, Student's . t-test was conducted in order to verify the significance (α=.05) of fit-discrepancies based on the type of abutment tooth and the materials. Results: Mean RMS-values for marginal fit (internal fit) ranged from 51.64. ±. 1.5 (36.12. ±. 1.34) to 69.62. ±. 8.11 (41.6. ±. 1.63). μm. Differences in marginal fit (canine: . P=.001; molar: . P=.047) and internal fit (canine: . P=.017; molar: . P=.046) were statistically significant.The results of the 3-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences in the RMS values of the two groups for the material (P . <. .001), the types of the abutment tooth (P . <. .001), and the measured region (P . <. .001). Conclusions: The marginal and internal fit of both PEKK and zirconia copings of both canine and molar were within the clinically acceptable range. However, the PEKK presented better fitness compared with the zirconia.

KW - Internal fit

KW - Marginal fit

KW - PEKK

KW - Three-dimensional analysis

KW - Zirconia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992345413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992345413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research

JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research

SN - 1883-1958

ER -