Abstract
Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P=.001, P
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 549-553 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry |
| Volume | 114 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 Oct 1 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oral Surgery
Cite this
Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. / Jeon, Jin Hun; Choi, Byeong Yeol; Kim, Chong Myeong; Kim, Ji Hwan; Kim, Hae-Young; Kim, Woong Chul.
In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 114, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 549-553.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners
AU - Jeon, Jin Hun
AU - Choi, Byeong Yeol
AU - Kim, Chong Myeong
AU - Kim, Ji Hwan
AU - Kim, Hae-Young
AU - Kim, Woong Chul
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P=.001, P
AB - Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P=.001, P
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942543944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942543944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 26182854
AN - SCOPUS:84942543944
VL - 114
SP - 549
EP - 553
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
SN - 0022-3913
IS - 4
ER -