Thresholds of resistance to CSF outflow in predicting shunt responsiveness

Dong Ju Kim, Hakseung Kim, Young Tak Kim, Byung C. Yoon, Zofia Czosnyka, Kun Woo Park, Marek Czosnyka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption capacity represent one of the primary causes of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The resistance to CSF outflow (Rout) may reflect the severity of this disturbance and has been used as a supplementary parameter to predict shunt responsiveness. However, there is no widely accepted threshold of Rout in this scenario. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate threshold through meta-analyses.

Methods: A total of four previously reported cutoff values of Rout (10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes) were selected as potential thresholds. A systematic review of existing studies involving NPH, shunt surgeries, and Rout was conducted. The pooled results from retrieved articles were subjected to statistical analyses.

Results: A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analyses based on the available preoperative Rout and postoperative improvement of subjects. The odds ratios of the four thresholds were 2.82, 3.58, 2.72, and 2.38 for 10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes of Rout, respectively. The Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes yielded high accuracy (72.95%), high sensitivity (80.26%), and moderate specificity (46.79%).

Discussion: The presented study conducted meta-analyses and revealed that a Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes is the most suitable threshold for predicting shunt responsiveness in NPH patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-340
Number of pages9
JournalNeurological Research
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Meta-Analysis
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Infusion study
  • Meta-analysis
  • Normal pressure hydrocephalus
  • Resistance to CSF outflow
  • Shunt responsiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Thresholds of resistance to CSF outflow in predicting shunt responsiveness. / Kim, Dong Ju; Kim, Hakseung; Kim, Young Tak; Yoon, Byung C.; Czosnyka, Zofia; Park, Kun Woo; Czosnyka, Marek.

In: Neurological Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 332-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Dong Ju ; Kim, Hakseung ; Kim, Young Tak ; Yoon, Byung C. ; Czosnyka, Zofia ; Park, Kun Woo ; Czosnyka, Marek. / Thresholds of resistance to CSF outflow in predicting shunt responsiveness. In: Neurological Research. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 332-340.
@article{f8d493cc682740e6af248c9549675208,
title = "Thresholds of resistance to CSF outflow in predicting shunt responsiveness",
abstract = "Objectives: Disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption capacity represent one of the primary causes of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The resistance to CSF outflow (Rout) may reflect the severity of this disturbance and has been used as a supplementary parameter to predict shunt responsiveness. However, there is no widely accepted threshold of Rout in this scenario. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate threshold through meta-analyses.Methods: A total of four previously reported cutoff values of Rout (10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes) were selected as potential thresholds. A systematic review of existing studies involving NPH, shunt surgeries, and Rout was conducted. The pooled results from retrieved articles were subjected to statistical analyses.Results: A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analyses based on the available preoperative Rout and postoperative improvement of subjects. The odds ratios of the four thresholds were 2.82, 3.58, 2.72, and 2.38 for 10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes of Rout, respectively. The Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes yielded high accuracy (72.95{\%}), high sensitivity (80.26{\%}), and moderate specificity (46.79{\%}).Discussion: The presented study conducted meta-analyses and revealed that a Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes is the most suitable threshold for predicting shunt responsiveness in NPH patients.",
keywords = "Infusion study, Meta-analysis, Normal pressure hydrocephalus, Resistance to CSF outflow, Shunt responsiveness",
author = "Kim, {Dong Ju} and Hakseung Kim and Kim, {Young Tak} and Yoon, {Byung C.} and Zofia Czosnyka and Park, {Kun Woo} and Marek Czosnyka",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000454",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "332--340",
journal = "Neurological Research",
issn = "0161-6412",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thresholds of resistance to CSF outflow in predicting shunt responsiveness

AU - Kim, Dong Ju

AU - Kim, Hakseung

AU - Kim, Young Tak

AU - Yoon, Byung C.

AU - Czosnyka, Zofia

AU - Park, Kun Woo

AU - Czosnyka, Marek

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption capacity represent one of the primary causes of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The resistance to CSF outflow (Rout) may reflect the severity of this disturbance and has been used as a supplementary parameter to predict shunt responsiveness. However, there is no widely accepted threshold of Rout in this scenario. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate threshold through meta-analyses.Methods: A total of four previously reported cutoff values of Rout (10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes) were selected as potential thresholds. A systematic review of existing studies involving NPH, shunt surgeries, and Rout was conducted. The pooled results from retrieved articles were subjected to statistical analyses.Results: A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analyses based on the available preoperative Rout and postoperative improvement of subjects. The odds ratios of the four thresholds were 2.82, 3.58, 2.72, and 2.38 for 10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes of Rout, respectively. The Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes yielded high accuracy (72.95%), high sensitivity (80.26%), and moderate specificity (46.79%).Discussion: The presented study conducted meta-analyses and revealed that a Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes is the most suitable threshold for predicting shunt responsiveness in NPH patients.

AB - Objectives: Disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption capacity represent one of the primary causes of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The resistance to CSF outflow (Rout) may reflect the severity of this disturbance and has been used as a supplementary parameter to predict shunt responsiveness. However, there is no widely accepted threshold of Rout in this scenario. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate threshold through meta-analyses.Methods: A total of four previously reported cutoff values of Rout (10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes) were selected as potential thresholds. A systematic review of existing studies involving NPH, shunt surgeries, and Rout was conducted. The pooled results from retrieved articles were subjected to statistical analyses.Results: A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analyses based on the available preoperative Rout and postoperative improvement of subjects. The odds ratios of the four thresholds were 2.82, 3.58, 2.72, and 2.38 for 10, 12, 15, and 18 mmHg/ml/minutes of Rout, respectively. The Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes yielded high accuracy (72.95%), high sensitivity (80.26%), and moderate specificity (46.79%).Discussion: The presented study conducted meta-analyses and revealed that a Rout of 12 mmHg/ml/ minutes is the most suitable threshold for predicting shunt responsiveness in NPH patients.

KW - Infusion study

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Normal pressure hydrocephalus

KW - Resistance to CSF outflow

KW - Shunt responsiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921800643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921800643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000454

DO - 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000454

M3 - Article

C2 - 25323618

AN - SCOPUS:84921800643

VL - 37

SP - 332

EP - 340

JO - Neurological Research

JF - Neurological Research

SN - 0161-6412

IS - 4

ER -