Ties that bind? Assessing the impact of economic interdependence on East Asian alliances

Dong Sun Lee, Sung Eun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article investigates how commercial ties affect the cohesiveness of USalliances with East Asian nations. While the conventional wisdom views their effects as positive, we argue that economic interdependence does not markedly reinforce East Asian alliances because the alliances have an asymmetrical structure. To evaluate these competing arguments, we examine the impact of bilateral trade on the USalliances with Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and South Korea, over the past quarter-century. Our empirical analysis provides little evidence for the conventional view, while supporting our argument. Based on this finding, the article offers some practical implications for the free trade agreement and the security alliance between South Korea and the USA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-235
Number of pages30
JournalPacific Focus
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Aug 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

economic interdependence
South Korea
free trade
Philippines
wisdom
Taiwan
Japan
evidence

Keywords

  • Alliance
  • East Asia
  • Economic interdependence
  • Power asymmetry
  • Trade

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Ties that bind? Assessing the impact of economic interdependence on East Asian alliances. / Lee, Dong Sun; Kim, Sung Eun.

In: Pacific Focus, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.08.2011, p. 206-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de9f87958e104c2e91a6bc335d39bcd0,
title = "Ties that bind? Assessing the impact of economic interdependence on East Asian alliances",
abstract = "This article investigates how commercial ties affect the cohesiveness of USalliances with East Asian nations. While the conventional wisdom views their effects as positive, we argue that economic interdependence does not markedly reinforce East Asian alliances because the alliances have an asymmetrical structure. To evaluate these competing arguments, we examine the impact of bilateral trade on the USalliances with Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and South Korea, over the past quarter-century. Our empirical analysis provides little evidence for the conventional view, while supporting our argument. Based on this finding, the article offers some practical implications for the free trade agreement and the security alliance between South Korea and the USA.",
keywords = "Alliance, East Asia, Economic interdependence, Power asymmetry, Trade",
author = "Lee, {Dong Sun} and Kim, {Sung Eun}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01063.x",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "206--235",
journal = "Pacific Focus",
issn = "1225-4657",
publisher = "INHA University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ties that bind? Assessing the impact of economic interdependence on East Asian alliances

AU - Lee, Dong Sun

AU - Kim, Sung Eun

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - This article investigates how commercial ties affect the cohesiveness of USalliances with East Asian nations. While the conventional wisdom views their effects as positive, we argue that economic interdependence does not markedly reinforce East Asian alliances because the alliances have an asymmetrical structure. To evaluate these competing arguments, we examine the impact of bilateral trade on the USalliances with Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and South Korea, over the past quarter-century. Our empirical analysis provides little evidence for the conventional view, while supporting our argument. Based on this finding, the article offers some practical implications for the free trade agreement and the security alliance between South Korea and the USA.

AB - This article investigates how commercial ties affect the cohesiveness of USalliances with East Asian nations. While the conventional wisdom views their effects as positive, we argue that economic interdependence does not markedly reinforce East Asian alliances because the alliances have an asymmetrical structure. To evaluate these competing arguments, we examine the impact of bilateral trade on the USalliances with Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and South Korea, over the past quarter-century. Our empirical analysis provides little evidence for the conventional view, while supporting our argument. Based on this finding, the article offers some practical implications for the free trade agreement and the security alliance between South Korea and the USA.

KW - Alliance

KW - East Asia

KW - Economic interdependence

KW - Power asymmetry

KW - Trade

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961039254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961039254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01063.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01063.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79961039254

VL - 26

SP - 206

EP - 235

JO - Pacific Focus

JF - Pacific Focus

SN - 1225-4657

IS - 2

ER -