Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation

Paul L.G. Vlek, Asia Khamzina, Hossein Azadi, Anik Bhaduri, Luna Bharati, Ademola Braimoh, Christopher Martius, Terry Sunderland, Fatemeh Taheri

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Land provides a host of ecosystem services, of which the provisioning services are often considered paramount. As the demand for agricultural products multiplies, other ecosystem services are being degraded or lost entirely. Finding a sustainable trade-off between food production and one or more of other ecosystem services, given the variety of stakeholders, is a matter of optimizing land use in a dynamic and complex socio-ecological system. Land degradation reduces our options to meet both food demands and environmental needs. In order to illustrate this trade-off dilemma, four representative services, carbon sinks, water storage, biodiversity, and space for urbanization, are discussed here based on a review of contemporary literature that cuts across the domain of ecosystem services that are provided by land. Agricultural research will have to expand its focus from the field to the landscape level and in the process examine the cost of production that internalizes environmental costs. In some situations, the public cost of agriculture in marginal environments outweighs the private gains, even with the best technologies in place. Land use and city planners will increasingly have to address the cost of occupying productive agricultural land or the conversion of natural habitats. Landscape designs and urban planning should aim for the preservation of agricultural land and the integrated management of land resources by closing water and nutrient cycles, and by restoring biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2196
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Nov 28

Fingerprint

land degradation
Land use
ecosystem service
Ecosystems
land use
Degradation
Biodiversity
trade-off
Costs
agricultural land
cost
biodiversity
costs
Agricultural products
Urban planning
carbon sink
agricultural research
food production
water storage
urban planning

Keywords

  • Agricultural land conversion
  • Biodiversity
  • Ecosystem services
  • Integrated land and water resource management (ILWM)
  • Urbanization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Vlek, P. L. G., Khamzina, A., Azadi, H., Bhaduri, A., Bharati, L., Braimoh, A., ... Taheri, F. (2017). Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12), [2196]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122196

Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation. / Vlek, Paul L.G.; Khamzina, Asia; Azadi, Hossein; Bhaduri, Anik; Bharati, Luna; Braimoh, Ademola; Martius, Christopher; Sunderland, Terry; Taheri, Fatemeh.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 9, No. 12, 2196, 28.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Vlek, PLG, Khamzina, A, Azadi, H, Bhaduri, A, Bharati, L, Braimoh, A, Martius, C, Sunderland, T & Taheri, F 2017, 'Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation', Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 12, 2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122196
Vlek, Paul L.G. ; Khamzina, Asia ; Azadi, Hossein ; Bhaduri, Anik ; Bharati, Luna ; Braimoh, Ademola ; Martius, Christopher ; Sunderland, Terry ; Taheri, Fatemeh. / Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 12.
@article{b3bb8fa45da14f1c88e0f207ecbc361d,
title = "Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation",
abstract = "Land provides a host of ecosystem services, of which the provisioning services are often considered paramount. As the demand for agricultural products multiplies, other ecosystem services are being degraded or lost entirely. Finding a sustainable trade-off between food production and one or more of other ecosystem services, given the variety of stakeholders, is a matter of optimizing land use in a dynamic and complex socio-ecological system. Land degradation reduces our options to meet both food demands and environmental needs. In order to illustrate this trade-off dilemma, four representative services, carbon sinks, water storage, biodiversity, and space for urbanization, are discussed here based on a review of contemporary literature that cuts across the domain of ecosystem services that are provided by land. Agricultural research will have to expand its focus from the field to the landscape level and in the process examine the cost of production that internalizes environmental costs. In some situations, the public cost of agriculture in marginal environments outweighs the private gains, even with the best technologies in place. Land use and city planners will increasingly have to address the cost of occupying productive agricultural land or the conversion of natural habitats. Landscape designs and urban planning should aim for the preservation of agricultural land and the integrated management of land resources by closing water and nutrient cycles, and by restoring biodiversity.",
keywords = "Agricultural land conversion, Biodiversity, Ecosystem services, Integrated land and water resource management (ILWM), Urbanization",
author = "Vlek, {Paul L.G.} and Asia Khamzina and Hossein Azadi and Anik Bhaduri and Luna Bharati and Ademola Braimoh and Christopher Martius and Terry Sunderland and Fatemeh Taheri",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3390/su9122196",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trade-offs in multi-purpose land use under land degradation

AU - Vlek, Paul L.G.

AU - Khamzina, Asia

AU - Azadi, Hossein

AU - Bhaduri, Anik

AU - Bharati, Luna

AU - Braimoh, Ademola

AU - Martius, Christopher

AU - Sunderland, Terry

AU - Taheri, Fatemeh

PY - 2017/11/28

Y1 - 2017/11/28

N2 - Land provides a host of ecosystem services, of which the provisioning services are often considered paramount. As the demand for agricultural products multiplies, other ecosystem services are being degraded or lost entirely. Finding a sustainable trade-off between food production and one or more of other ecosystem services, given the variety of stakeholders, is a matter of optimizing land use in a dynamic and complex socio-ecological system. Land degradation reduces our options to meet both food demands and environmental needs. In order to illustrate this trade-off dilemma, four representative services, carbon sinks, water storage, biodiversity, and space for urbanization, are discussed here based on a review of contemporary literature that cuts across the domain of ecosystem services that are provided by land. Agricultural research will have to expand its focus from the field to the landscape level and in the process examine the cost of production that internalizes environmental costs. In some situations, the public cost of agriculture in marginal environments outweighs the private gains, even with the best technologies in place. Land use and city planners will increasingly have to address the cost of occupying productive agricultural land or the conversion of natural habitats. Landscape designs and urban planning should aim for the preservation of agricultural land and the integrated management of land resources by closing water and nutrient cycles, and by restoring biodiversity.

AB - Land provides a host of ecosystem services, of which the provisioning services are often considered paramount. As the demand for agricultural products multiplies, other ecosystem services are being degraded or lost entirely. Finding a sustainable trade-off between food production and one or more of other ecosystem services, given the variety of stakeholders, is a matter of optimizing land use in a dynamic and complex socio-ecological system. Land degradation reduces our options to meet both food demands and environmental needs. In order to illustrate this trade-off dilemma, four representative services, carbon sinks, water storage, biodiversity, and space for urbanization, are discussed here based on a review of contemporary literature that cuts across the domain of ecosystem services that are provided by land. Agricultural research will have to expand its focus from the field to the landscape level and in the process examine the cost of production that internalizes environmental costs. In some situations, the public cost of agriculture in marginal environments outweighs the private gains, even with the best technologies in place. Land use and city planners will increasingly have to address the cost of occupying productive agricultural land or the conversion of natural habitats. Landscape designs and urban planning should aim for the preservation of agricultural land and the integrated management of land resources by closing water and nutrient cycles, and by restoring biodiversity.

KW - Agricultural land conversion

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Integrated land and water resource management (ILWM)

KW - Urbanization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035351466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035351466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su9122196

DO - 10.3390/su9122196

M3 - Review article

VL - 9

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 12

M1 - 2196

ER -