Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions

S. Y. Kim, K. W. Lee, S. R. Seong, M. A. Lee, I. B. Lee, H. H. Son, Hae-Young Kim, M. H. Oh, B. H. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study investigated the clinical effectiveness of three adhesives and the use of retention form in Class V resin composite restorations of the non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) over a two-year period. One-hundred and fifty NCCLs in 39 patients were restored with resin composites according to six experimental protocols combining the presence or absence of retention form and three adhesives: ScotchBond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE), an experimental adhesive (EX, Vericom) and Adper Prompt (AP, 3M ESPE). All restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to evaluate the restorations. MP was found to have significantly superior marginal adaptation than AP in cumulative logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.31; p=0.0397). In analysis using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test to compare the clinical performance of restorations with and without retention form, EX with retention form showed a significantly higher retention rate at two years than that without retention form (p=0.0089). Restorations with retention form also showed significantly less marginal discoloration than those without retention form in all three adhesives (p=0.0336).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-515
Number of pages9
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Adhesives
United States Public Health Service
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. / Kim, S. Y.; Lee, K. W.; Seong, S. R.; Lee, M. A.; Lee, I. B.; Son, H. H.; Kim, Hae-Young; Oh, M. H.; Cho, B. H.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 34, No. 5, 01.09.2009, p. 507-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, S. Y. ; Lee, K. W. ; Seong, S. R. ; Lee, M. A. ; Lee, I. B. ; Son, H. H. ; Kim, Hae-Young ; Oh, M. H. ; Cho, B. H. / Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. In: Operative Dentistry. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 5. pp. 507-515.
@article{526604f4b74949ff9c6f6e9dec38ec45,
title = "Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions",
abstract = "The current study investigated the clinical effectiveness of three adhesives and the use of retention form in Class V resin composite restorations of the non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) over a two-year period. One-hundred and fifty NCCLs in 39 patients were restored with resin composites according to six experimental protocols combining the presence or absence of retention form and three adhesives: ScotchBond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE), an experimental adhesive (EX, Vericom) and Adper Prompt (AP, 3M ESPE). All restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to evaluate the restorations. MP was found to have significantly superior marginal adaptation than AP in cumulative logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 2.12; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.05-4.31; p=0.0397). In analysis using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test to compare the clinical performance of restorations with and without retention form, EX with retention form showed a significantly higher retention rate at two years than that without retention form (p=0.0089). Restorations with retention form also showed significantly less marginal discoloration than those without retention form in all three adhesives (p=0.0336).",
author = "Kim, {S. Y.} and Lee, {K. W.} and Seong, {S. R.} and Lee, {M. A.} and Lee, {I. B.} and Son, {H. H.} and Hae-Young Kim and Oh, {M. H.} and Cho, {B. H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/08-006C",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "507--515",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions

AU - Kim, S. Y.

AU - Lee, K. W.

AU - Seong, S. R.

AU - Lee, M. A.

AU - Lee, I. B.

AU - Son, H. H.

AU - Kim, Hae-Young

AU - Oh, M. H.

AU - Cho, B. H.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - The current study investigated the clinical effectiveness of three adhesives and the use of retention form in Class V resin composite restorations of the non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) over a two-year period. One-hundred and fifty NCCLs in 39 patients were restored with resin composites according to six experimental protocols combining the presence or absence of retention form and three adhesives: ScotchBond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE), an experimental adhesive (EX, Vericom) and Adper Prompt (AP, 3M ESPE). All restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to evaluate the restorations. MP was found to have significantly superior marginal adaptation than AP in cumulative logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.31; p=0.0397). In analysis using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test to compare the clinical performance of restorations with and without retention form, EX with retention form showed a significantly higher retention rate at two years than that without retention form (p=0.0089). Restorations with retention form also showed significantly less marginal discoloration than those without retention form in all three adhesives (p=0.0336).

AB - The current study investigated the clinical effectiveness of three adhesives and the use of retention form in Class V resin composite restorations of the non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) over a two-year period. One-hundred and fifty NCCLs in 39 patients were restored with resin composites according to six experimental protocols combining the presence or absence of retention form and three adhesives: ScotchBond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE), an experimental adhesive (EX, Vericom) and Adper Prompt (AP, 3M ESPE). All restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to evaluate the restorations. MP was found to have significantly superior marginal adaptation than AP in cumulative logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.31; p=0.0397). In analysis using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test to compare the clinical performance of restorations with and without retention form, EX with retention form showed a significantly higher retention rate at two years than that without retention form (p=0.0089). Restorations with retention form also showed significantly less marginal discoloration than those without retention form in all three adhesives (p=0.0336).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350164642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350164642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/08-006C

DO - 10.2341/08-006C

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 507

EP - 515

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 5

ER -