Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy

Seung Yeol Lee, Eungi Min, Jaekeon Bae, Chin Youb Chung, Kyoung Min Lee, Soon Sun Kwon, Moon Seok Park, Kisung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To assess how the radiation dose is affected by changes in the types of thyroid shields used and by the arrangements or ways in which they are worn during the intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Although the danger to the thyroid from exposure to radiation is well known, there are no guidelines for the proper use of thyroid shields. METHODS.: Two photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the dose of scattered radiation arriving at the location of the thyroid in a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. On an operating table beside this setup was an anthropomorphic chest phantom representing a patient for which treatment with C-arm fluoroscopy was simulated. Radiation doses were measured using 3 different arrangements of the thyroid shield: worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent. The same tests were performed using 2 kinds of thyroid shield: lead and lead-equivalent. RESULTS.: For the lead-shield group, radiation doses were measured in 3 arrangements; worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent, for which the results were 1.91 ± 0.13, 2.35 ± 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.13 μSv/min, respectively. Wearing the shield tight against the throat and wearing it loose with a bismuth masking reagent led to lower radiation exposure levels than by simply wearing the shield loosely (P ≤ 0.001). For the lead-equivalent shield group, doses were measured for the same 3 arrangements, for which the results were 1.79 ± 0.12, 1.82 ± 0.11, and 1.74 ± 0.12 μSv/min. Lower scattered radiation doses were delivered to the thyroid in the lead-equivalent thyroid shield group compared with the lead thyroid shield group (P ≤ 0.001). The unshielded thyroid group received a radiation dose of 16.32 ± 0.48 μSv/min. CONCLUSION.: The use of some form of thyroid shield is essential during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy. It was found that the best way to reduce scattered radiation exposure to the thyroid was wearing the thyroid shield tightly or wearing it loosely in combination with a bismuth masking reagent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2108-2112
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume38
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov 15

Fingerprint

Fluoroscopy
Ionizing Radiation
Thyroid Gland
Arm
Bismuth
Radiation
Surgeons
Operating Tables
Pharynx
Lead
Spine
Thorax

Keywords

  • annual dose limit
  • bismuth masking reagent
  • C-arm fluoroscopy
  • lead
  • leadequivalent
  • phantom
  • radiation dose
  • scattered radiation
  • spine surgery
  • thyroid shied

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. / Lee, Seung Yeol; Min, Eungi; Bae, Jaekeon; Chung, Chin Youb; Lee, Kyoung Min; Kwon, Soon Sun; Park, Moon Seok; Lee, Kisung.

In: Spine, Vol. 38, No. 24, 15.11.2013, p. 2108-2112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Seung Yeol ; Min, Eungi ; Bae, Jaekeon ; Chung, Chin Youb ; Lee, Kyoung Min ; Kwon, Soon Sun ; Park, Moon Seok ; Lee, Kisung. / Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. In: Spine. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 24. pp. 2108-2112.
@article{6a1246c2a7a24c2084a253e625296b8d,
title = "Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN.: Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To assess how the radiation dose is affected by changes in the types of thyroid shields used and by the arrangements or ways in which they are worn during the intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Although the danger to the thyroid from exposure to radiation is well known, there are no guidelines for the proper use of thyroid shields. METHODS.: Two photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the dose of scattered radiation arriving at the location of the thyroid in a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. On an operating table beside this setup was an anthropomorphic chest phantom representing a patient for which treatment with C-arm fluoroscopy was simulated. Radiation doses were measured using 3 different arrangements of the thyroid shield: worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent. The same tests were performed using 2 kinds of thyroid shield: lead and lead-equivalent. RESULTS.: For the lead-shield group, radiation doses were measured in 3 arrangements; worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent, for which the results were 1.91 ± 0.13, 2.35 ± 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.13 μSv/min, respectively. Wearing the shield tight against the throat and wearing it loose with a bismuth masking reagent led to lower radiation exposure levels than by simply wearing the shield loosely (P ≤ 0.001). For the lead-equivalent shield group, doses were measured for the same 3 arrangements, for which the results were 1.79 ± 0.12, 1.82 ± 0.11, and 1.74 ± 0.12 μSv/min. Lower scattered radiation doses were delivered to the thyroid in the lead-equivalent thyroid shield group compared with the lead thyroid shield group (P ≤ 0.001). The unshielded thyroid group received a radiation dose of 16.32 ± 0.48 μSv/min. CONCLUSION.: The use of some form of thyroid shield is essential during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy. It was found that the best way to reduce scattered radiation exposure to the thyroid was wearing the thyroid shield tightly or wearing it loosely in combination with a bismuth masking reagent.",
keywords = "annual dose limit, bismuth masking reagent, C-arm fluoroscopy, lead, leadequivalent, phantom, radiation dose, scattered radiation, spine surgery, thyroid shied",
author = "Lee, {Seung Yeol} and Eungi Min and Jaekeon Bae and Chung, {Chin Youb} and Lee, {Kyoung Min} and Kwon, {Soon Sun} and Park, {Moon Seok} and Kisung Lee",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8270d",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "2108--2112",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy

AU - Lee, Seung Yeol

AU - Min, Eungi

AU - Bae, Jaekeon

AU - Chung, Chin Youb

AU - Lee, Kyoung Min

AU - Kwon, Soon Sun

AU - Park, Moon Seok

AU - Lee, Kisung

PY - 2013/11/15

Y1 - 2013/11/15

N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To assess how the radiation dose is affected by changes in the types of thyroid shields used and by the arrangements or ways in which they are worn during the intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Although the danger to the thyroid from exposure to radiation is well known, there are no guidelines for the proper use of thyroid shields. METHODS.: Two photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the dose of scattered radiation arriving at the location of the thyroid in a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. On an operating table beside this setup was an anthropomorphic chest phantom representing a patient for which treatment with C-arm fluoroscopy was simulated. Radiation doses were measured using 3 different arrangements of the thyroid shield: worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent. The same tests were performed using 2 kinds of thyroid shield: lead and lead-equivalent. RESULTS.: For the lead-shield group, radiation doses were measured in 3 arrangements; worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent, for which the results were 1.91 ± 0.13, 2.35 ± 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.13 μSv/min, respectively. Wearing the shield tight against the throat and wearing it loose with a bismuth masking reagent led to lower radiation exposure levels than by simply wearing the shield loosely (P ≤ 0.001). For the lead-equivalent shield group, doses were measured for the same 3 arrangements, for which the results were 1.79 ± 0.12, 1.82 ± 0.11, and 1.74 ± 0.12 μSv/min. Lower scattered radiation doses were delivered to the thyroid in the lead-equivalent thyroid shield group compared with the lead thyroid shield group (P ≤ 0.001). The unshielded thyroid group received a radiation dose of 16.32 ± 0.48 μSv/min. CONCLUSION.: The use of some form of thyroid shield is essential during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy. It was found that the best way to reduce scattered radiation exposure to the thyroid was wearing the thyroid shield tightly or wearing it loosely in combination with a bismuth masking reagent.

AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To assess how the radiation dose is affected by changes in the types of thyroid shields used and by the arrangements or ways in which they are worn during the intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Although the danger to the thyroid from exposure to radiation is well known, there are no guidelines for the proper use of thyroid shields. METHODS.: Two photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the dose of scattered radiation arriving at the location of the thyroid in a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. On an operating table beside this setup was an anthropomorphic chest phantom representing a patient for which treatment with C-arm fluoroscopy was simulated. Radiation doses were measured using 3 different arrangements of the thyroid shield: worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent. The same tests were performed using 2 kinds of thyroid shield: lead and lead-equivalent. RESULTS.: For the lead-shield group, radiation doses were measured in 3 arrangements; worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent, for which the results were 1.91 ± 0.13, 2.35 ± 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.13 μSv/min, respectively. Wearing the shield tight against the throat and wearing it loose with a bismuth masking reagent led to lower radiation exposure levels than by simply wearing the shield loosely (P ≤ 0.001). For the lead-equivalent shield group, doses were measured for the same 3 arrangements, for which the results were 1.79 ± 0.12, 1.82 ± 0.11, and 1.74 ± 0.12 μSv/min. Lower scattered radiation doses were delivered to the thyroid in the lead-equivalent thyroid shield group compared with the lead thyroid shield group (P ≤ 0.001). The unshielded thyroid group received a radiation dose of 16.32 ± 0.48 μSv/min. CONCLUSION.: The use of some form of thyroid shield is essential during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy. It was found that the best way to reduce scattered radiation exposure to the thyroid was wearing the thyroid shield tightly or wearing it loosely in combination with a bismuth masking reagent.

KW - annual dose limit

KW - bismuth masking reagent

KW - C-arm fluoroscopy

KW - lead

KW - leadequivalent

KW - phantom

KW - radiation dose

KW - scattered radiation

KW - spine surgery

KW - thyroid shied

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888133095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888133095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8270d

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8270d

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 2108

EP - 2112

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 24

ER -