Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion: A systematic review

Nayansi Jha, Eun Ha Choi, Nagendra Kumar Kaushik, Jae Jun Ryu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0180342
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jul 1

Fingerprint

systematic review
Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures
Bone
bones
instrumentation
Alveolar Process
Bone and Bones
Equipment and Supplies
Surgery
Bone Regeneration
surgery
Retrospective Studies
Databases
Prospective Studies
prospective studies
cohort studies
retrospective studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
electronics
ultrasonics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion : A systematic review. / Jha, Nayansi; Choi, Eun Ha; Kaushik, Nagendra Kumar; Ryu, Jae Jun.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 7, e0180342, 01.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jha, Nayansi ; Choi, Eun Ha ; Kaushik, Nagendra Kumar ; Ryu, Jae Jun. / Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion : A systematic review. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 7.
@article{ff8bf56029a5428da0e576629f71f20a,
title = "Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion: A systematic review",
abstract = "The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65{\%}, and on average, the implant success was 97{\%}. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.",
author = "Nayansi Jha and Choi, {Eun Ha} and Kaushik, {Nagendra Kumar} and Ryu, {Jae Jun}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0180342",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Jha, Nayansi

AU - Choi, Eun Ha

AU - Kaushik, Nagendra Kumar

AU - Ryu, Jae Jun

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.

AB - The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025153181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025153181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180342

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180342

M3 - Article

C2 - 28732054

AN - SCOPUS:85025153181

VL - 12

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0180342

ER -