Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0180342 |
| Journal | PLoS One |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 Jul 1 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
Cite this
Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion : A systematic review. / Jha, Nayansi; Choi, Eun Ha; Kaushik, Nagendra Kumar; Ryu, Jae Jun.
In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 7, e0180342, 01.07.2017.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Jha, Nayansi
AU - Choi, Eun Ha
AU - Kaushik, Nagendra Kumar
AU - Ryu, Jae Jun
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.
AB - The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025153181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025153181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180342
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180342
M3 - Article
C2 - 28732054
AN - SCOPUS:85025153181
VL - 12
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 7
M1 - e0180342
ER -