Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome

Seok Kang, Hee Kyu Kwon, Ki Hoon Kim, Hyung Seok Yun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the correlation of the ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio (WFR) and cross sectional area of median nerve at the wrist (CSA-W) to the electrophysiologic severity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Method: One hundred and ten wrists electrophysiologically graded as mild, moderate, and severe CTS and 38 healthy controls underwent ultrasonography of median nerve at the distal wrist crease and mid-forearm. WFR and CSA-W were analyzed according to the severity of CTS. Results: WFR was 1.12±0.14, 1.91±0.33, 2.27±0.47 and 3.02±0.97 and the CSAs-W was 7.23±1.67 mm 2, 13.51±3.72 mm 2, 14.67±2.93 mm 2, and 18.74±6.01 mm 2 in controls, mild (n=28), moderate (n=46), and severe (n=36) CTS, respectively. CSA-W displayed significant diff erences between the control and the mild CTS, moderate CTS and severe CTS groups. However, there was no significant difference between mild CTS and moderate CTS groups. WFR revealed significant diff erence between all groups. Th e sensitivity and specificity of the WFR in grading the severity of CTS were higher than those of the CSA-W. Conclusion Ultrasonography is a useful complementary tool for the evaluation of CTS. Both WFR and CSA-W are highly correlated with severity grade of CTS. However, WFR is superior to CSA-W for diagnosis and grading of the severity of CTS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-79
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Median Nerve
Ultrasonography
Wrist
Forearm

Keywords

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Cross sectional area
  • Electrophysiologic severity
  • Ratio
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. / Kang, Seok; Kwon, Hee Kyu; Kim, Ki Hoon; Yun, Hyung Seok.

In: Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 72-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8af1313e43f4dffaa43ab9e252efeda,
title = "Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the correlation of the ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio (WFR) and cross sectional area of median nerve at the wrist (CSA-W) to the electrophysiologic severity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Method: One hundred and ten wrists electrophysiologically graded as mild, moderate, and severe CTS and 38 healthy controls underwent ultrasonography of median nerve at the distal wrist crease and mid-forearm. WFR and CSA-W were analyzed according to the severity of CTS. Results: WFR was 1.12±0.14, 1.91±0.33, 2.27±0.47 and 3.02±0.97 and the CSAs-W was 7.23±1.67 mm 2, 13.51±3.72 mm 2, 14.67±2.93 mm 2, and 18.74±6.01 mm 2 in controls, mild (n=28), moderate (n=46), and severe (n=36) CTS, respectively. CSA-W displayed significant diff erences between the control and the mild CTS, moderate CTS and severe CTS groups. However, there was no significant difference between mild CTS and moderate CTS groups. WFR revealed significant diff erence between all groups. Th e sensitivity and specificity of the WFR in grading the severity of CTS were higher than those of the CSA-W. Conclusion Ultrasonography is a useful complementary tool for the evaluation of CTS. Both WFR and CSA-W are highly correlated with severity grade of CTS. However, WFR is superior to CSA-W for diagnosis and grading of the severity of CTS.",
keywords = "Carpal tunnel syndrome, Cross sectional area, Electrophysiologic severity, Ratio, Ultrasonography",
author = "Seok Kang and Kwon, {Hee Kyu} and Kim, {Ki Hoon} and Yun, {Hyung Seok}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.72",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "72--79",
journal = "Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "2234-0645",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (KARM)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome

AU - Kang, Seok

AU - Kwon, Hee Kyu

AU - Kim, Ki Hoon

AU - Yun, Hyung Seok

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the correlation of the ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio (WFR) and cross sectional area of median nerve at the wrist (CSA-W) to the electrophysiologic severity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Method: One hundred and ten wrists electrophysiologically graded as mild, moderate, and severe CTS and 38 healthy controls underwent ultrasonography of median nerve at the distal wrist crease and mid-forearm. WFR and CSA-W were analyzed according to the severity of CTS. Results: WFR was 1.12±0.14, 1.91±0.33, 2.27±0.47 and 3.02±0.97 and the CSAs-W was 7.23±1.67 mm 2, 13.51±3.72 mm 2, 14.67±2.93 mm 2, and 18.74±6.01 mm 2 in controls, mild (n=28), moderate (n=46), and severe (n=36) CTS, respectively. CSA-W displayed significant diff erences between the control and the mild CTS, moderate CTS and severe CTS groups. However, there was no significant difference between mild CTS and moderate CTS groups. WFR revealed significant diff erence between all groups. Th e sensitivity and specificity of the WFR in grading the severity of CTS were higher than those of the CSA-W. Conclusion Ultrasonography is a useful complementary tool for the evaluation of CTS. Both WFR and CSA-W are highly correlated with severity grade of CTS. However, WFR is superior to CSA-W for diagnosis and grading of the severity of CTS.

AB - Objective: To investigate the correlation of the ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio (WFR) and cross sectional area of median nerve at the wrist (CSA-W) to the electrophysiologic severity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Method: One hundred and ten wrists electrophysiologically graded as mild, moderate, and severe CTS and 38 healthy controls underwent ultrasonography of median nerve at the distal wrist crease and mid-forearm. WFR and CSA-W were analyzed according to the severity of CTS. Results: WFR was 1.12±0.14, 1.91±0.33, 2.27±0.47 and 3.02±0.97 and the CSAs-W was 7.23±1.67 mm 2, 13.51±3.72 mm 2, 14.67±2.93 mm 2, and 18.74±6.01 mm 2 in controls, mild (n=28), moderate (n=46), and severe (n=36) CTS, respectively. CSA-W displayed significant diff erences between the control and the mild CTS, moderate CTS and severe CTS groups. However, there was no significant difference between mild CTS and moderate CTS groups. WFR revealed significant diff erence between all groups. Th e sensitivity and specificity of the WFR in grading the severity of CTS were higher than those of the CSA-W. Conclusion Ultrasonography is a useful complementary tool for the evaluation of CTS. Both WFR and CSA-W are highly correlated with severity grade of CTS. However, WFR is superior to CSA-W for diagnosis and grading of the severity of CTS.

KW - Carpal tunnel syndrome

KW - Cross sectional area

KW - Electrophysiologic severity

KW - Ratio

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861968882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861968882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.72

DO - 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.72

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 72

EP - 79

JO - Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 2234-0645

IS - 1

ER -