TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasound evaluation of normal and abnormal fetuses
T2 - Comparison of conventional, tissue harmonic, and pulse-inversion harmonic imaging techniques
AU - Ryu, Jeong Ah
AU - Kim, Bohyun
AU - Kim, Sooah
AU - Yang, Soon Ha
AU - Choi, Moon Hae
AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Objective: To determine the usefulness of tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and pulse-inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI) in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetuses. Materials and Methods: Forty-one pregnant women who bore a total of 31 normal and ten abnormal fetuses underwent conventional ultrasonography (CUS), and then THI and PIHI. US images of six organ systems, namely the brain, spine, heart, abdomen, extremities and face were compared between the three techniques in terms of overall conspicuity and the definition of borders and internal structures. Results: For the brain, heart, abdomen and face, overall conspicuity at THI and PIHI was significantly better than at CUS (p < 0.05). There was, though, no significant difference between THI and PIHI. Affected organs in abnormal fetuses were more clearly depicted at THI and PIHI than at CUS. Conclusion: Both THI and PIHI appear to be superior to CUS for the evaluation of normal or abnormal structures, particularly the brain, heart, abdomen and face.
AB - Objective: To determine the usefulness of tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and pulse-inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI) in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetuses. Materials and Methods: Forty-one pregnant women who bore a total of 31 normal and ten abnormal fetuses underwent conventional ultrasonography (CUS), and then THI and PIHI. US images of six organ systems, namely the brain, spine, heart, abdomen, extremities and face were compared between the three techniques in terms of overall conspicuity and the definition of borders and internal structures. Results: For the brain, heart, abdomen and face, overall conspicuity at THI and PIHI was significantly better than at CUS (p < 0.05). There was, though, no significant difference between THI and PIHI. Affected organs in abnormal fetuses were more clearly depicted at THI and PIHI than at CUS. Conclusion: Both THI and PIHI appear to be superior to CUS for the evaluation of normal or abnormal structures, particularly the brain, heart, abdomen and face.
KW - Fetus, US
KW - Pulse-inversion harmonic imaging, US
KW - Tissue harmonic imaging, US
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542682704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3348/kjr.2003.4.3.184
DO - 10.3348/kjr.2003.4.3.184
M3 - Article
C2 - 14530648
AN - SCOPUS:1542682704
SN - 1229-6929
VL - 4
SP - 184
EP - 190
JO - Korean Journal of Radiology
JF - Korean Journal of Radiology
IS - 3
ER -