Underestimation of roughness in rough rock joints

Eun Soo Hong, Jong-Sub Lee, In Mo Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies have been made to improve Barton's shear strength model for the quantification of rock joints. However, in these previous studies, the roughness and shear strength of the rock joint have been underestimated especially for relatively high undulated profiles (joint roughness coefficient (JRC) > 14). The main factors of roughness underestimation in rough rock joints are investigated for the proper quantification of rock joint roughness. The aliasing effect and the roughness characteristics are analyzed by using artificial joint profiles and natural rock joint profiles. A 3D camera scanner is adopted to verify the main source of underestimation when using conventional measurement methods. Shear strength tests are carded out by using two types of shear apparatus to study the roughness mobilization characteristics, which may also affect the roughness underestimation. The results of joint roughness assessment, such as aliasing and undulation of waviness, show that the roughness can be underestimated in relatively rough joint profiles (JRC> 14). At least two components of roughness parameters are needed to properly represent the joint roughness, for example, the amplitude and the inclination angle of joint asperity. Roughness mobilization is affected by both the normal stress and the asperity scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1385-1403
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Aug 15

Fingerprint

roughness
Surface roughness
Rocks
rock
Shear strength
shear strength
asperity
mobilization
measurement method
scanner
Cameras

Keywords

  • Aliasing
  • JRC
  • Roughness mobilization
  • Roughness parameter
  • Roughness underestimation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Computational Mechanics

Cite this

Underestimation of roughness in rough rock joints. / Hong, Eun Soo; Lee, Jong-Sub; Lee, In Mo.

In: International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 32, No. 11, 15.08.2008, p. 1385-1403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7421b6c1d3b4af4a2561a786ef2ca09,
title = "Underestimation of roughness in rough rock joints",
abstract = "Numerous studies have been made to improve Barton's shear strength model for the quantification of rock joints. However, in these previous studies, the roughness and shear strength of the rock joint have been underestimated especially for relatively high undulated profiles (joint roughness coefficient (JRC) > 14). The main factors of roughness underestimation in rough rock joints are investigated for the proper quantification of rock joint roughness. The aliasing effect and the roughness characteristics are analyzed by using artificial joint profiles and natural rock joint profiles. A 3D camera scanner is adopted to verify the main source of underestimation when using conventional measurement methods. Shear strength tests are carded out by using two types of shear apparatus to study the roughness mobilization characteristics, which may also affect the roughness underestimation. The results of joint roughness assessment, such as aliasing and undulation of waviness, show that the roughness can be underestimated in relatively rough joint profiles (JRC> 14). At least two components of roughness parameters are needed to properly represent the joint roughness, for example, the amplitude and the inclination angle of joint asperity. Roughness mobilization is affected by both the normal stress and the asperity scale.",
keywords = "Aliasing, JRC, Roughness mobilization, Roughness parameter, Roughness underestimation",
author = "Hong, {Eun Soo} and Jong-Sub Lee and Lee, {In Mo}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/nag.678",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1385--1403",
journal = "International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics",
issn = "0363-9061",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underestimation of roughness in rough rock joints

AU - Hong, Eun Soo

AU - Lee, Jong-Sub

AU - Lee, In Mo

PY - 2008/8/15

Y1 - 2008/8/15

N2 - Numerous studies have been made to improve Barton's shear strength model for the quantification of rock joints. However, in these previous studies, the roughness and shear strength of the rock joint have been underestimated especially for relatively high undulated profiles (joint roughness coefficient (JRC) > 14). The main factors of roughness underestimation in rough rock joints are investigated for the proper quantification of rock joint roughness. The aliasing effect and the roughness characteristics are analyzed by using artificial joint profiles and natural rock joint profiles. A 3D camera scanner is adopted to verify the main source of underestimation when using conventional measurement methods. Shear strength tests are carded out by using two types of shear apparatus to study the roughness mobilization characteristics, which may also affect the roughness underestimation. The results of joint roughness assessment, such as aliasing and undulation of waviness, show that the roughness can be underestimated in relatively rough joint profiles (JRC> 14). At least two components of roughness parameters are needed to properly represent the joint roughness, for example, the amplitude and the inclination angle of joint asperity. Roughness mobilization is affected by both the normal stress and the asperity scale.

AB - Numerous studies have been made to improve Barton's shear strength model for the quantification of rock joints. However, in these previous studies, the roughness and shear strength of the rock joint have been underestimated especially for relatively high undulated profiles (joint roughness coefficient (JRC) > 14). The main factors of roughness underestimation in rough rock joints are investigated for the proper quantification of rock joint roughness. The aliasing effect and the roughness characteristics are analyzed by using artificial joint profiles and natural rock joint profiles. A 3D camera scanner is adopted to verify the main source of underestimation when using conventional measurement methods. Shear strength tests are carded out by using two types of shear apparatus to study the roughness mobilization characteristics, which may also affect the roughness underestimation. The results of joint roughness assessment, such as aliasing and undulation of waviness, show that the roughness can be underestimated in relatively rough joint profiles (JRC> 14). At least two components of roughness parameters are needed to properly represent the joint roughness, for example, the amplitude and the inclination angle of joint asperity. Roughness mobilization is affected by both the normal stress and the asperity scale.

KW - Aliasing

KW - JRC

KW - Roughness mobilization

KW - Roughness parameter

KW - Roughness underestimation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49649099492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49649099492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nag.678

DO - 10.1002/nag.678

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1385

EP - 1403

JO - International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

JF - International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

SN - 0363-9061

IS - 11

ER -