Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic: A Replacement for Excretory Urography?

Jeong Ah Ryu, Bohyun Kim, Yong Hwan Jeon, Jongmee Lee, Jin Wook Lee, Seong Soo Jeon, Kwan Hyun Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the usefulness of unenhanced spiral CT (UCT) with that of excretory urography (EU) in patients with acute flank pain. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients presenting with acute flank pain underwent both UCT and EU. Both techniques were used to determine the presence, size, and location of urinary stone, and the presence or absence of secondary signs was also evaluated. The existence of ureteral stone was confirmed by its removal or spontaneous passage during follow-up. The absence of a stone was determined on the basis of the clinical and radiological evidence. Results: Twenty-one of the 30 patients had one or more ureteral stones and nine had no stone. CT depicted 22 of 23 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone, and no calculus in all nine without a stone. The sensitivity and specificity of UCT were 96% and 100%, respectively. EU disclosed 14 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone and no calculus in eight of the nine without a stone. UCT and EU demonstrated secondary signs of ureterolithiasis in 15 and 17 patients, respectively. Conclusion: For the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain, UCT is an excellent modality with high sensitivity and specificity. In near future it may replace EU.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-20
Number of pages7
JournalKorean Journal of Radiology
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Renal Colic
Urography
Spiral Computed Tomography
Calculi
Flank Pain
Acute Pain
Ureterolithiasis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Urinary Calculi

Keywords

  • Stone
  • Unenhanced CT Excretory urography Ureter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Ryu, J. A., Kim, B., Jeon, Y. H., Lee, J., Lee, J. W., Jeon, S. S., & Park, K. H. (2001). Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic: A Replacement for Excretory Urography? Korean Journal of Radiology, 2(1), 14-20.

Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic : A Replacement for Excretory Urography? / Ryu, Jeong Ah; Kim, Bohyun; Jeon, Yong Hwan; Lee, Jongmee; Lee, Jin Wook; Jeon, Seong Soo; Park, Kwan Hyun.

In: Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 14-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryu, JA, Kim, B, Jeon, YH, Lee, J, Lee, JW, Jeon, SS & Park, KH 2001, 'Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic: A Replacement for Excretory Urography?', Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14-20.
Ryu, Jeong Ah ; Kim, Bohyun ; Jeon, Yong Hwan ; Lee, Jongmee ; Lee, Jin Wook ; Jeon, Seong Soo ; Park, Kwan Hyun. / Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic : A Replacement for Excretory Urography?. In: Korean Journal of Radiology. 2001 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 14-20.
@article{671813e88fcc423d91bc462fad30f92d,
title = "Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic: A Replacement for Excretory Urography?",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the usefulness of unenhanced spiral CT (UCT) with that of excretory urography (EU) in patients with acute flank pain. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients presenting with acute flank pain underwent both UCT and EU. Both techniques were used to determine the presence, size, and location of urinary stone, and the presence or absence of secondary signs was also evaluated. The existence of ureteral stone was confirmed by its removal or spontaneous passage during follow-up. The absence of a stone was determined on the basis of the clinical and radiological evidence. Results: Twenty-one of the 30 patients had one or more ureteral stones and nine had no stone. CT depicted 22 of 23 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone, and no calculus in all nine without a stone. The sensitivity and specificity of UCT were 96{\%} and 100{\%}, respectively. EU disclosed 14 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone and no calculus in eight of the nine without a stone. UCT and EU demonstrated secondary signs of ureterolithiasis in 15 and 17 patients, respectively. Conclusion: For the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain, UCT is an excellent modality with high sensitivity and specificity. In near future it may replace EU.",
keywords = "Stone, Unenhanced CT Excretory urography Ureter",
author = "Ryu, {Jeong Ah} and Bohyun Kim and Jeon, {Yong Hwan} and Jongmee Lee and Lee, {Jin Wook} and Jeon, {Seong Soo} and Park, {Kwan Hyun}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "14--20",
journal = "Korean Journal of Radiology",
issn = "1229-6929",
publisher = "Korean Radiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unenhanced Spiral CT in Acute Ureteral Colic

T2 - A Replacement for Excretory Urography?

AU - Ryu, Jeong Ah

AU - Kim, Bohyun

AU - Jeon, Yong Hwan

AU - Lee, Jongmee

AU - Lee, Jin Wook

AU - Jeon, Seong Soo

AU - Park, Kwan Hyun

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the usefulness of unenhanced spiral CT (UCT) with that of excretory urography (EU) in patients with acute flank pain. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients presenting with acute flank pain underwent both UCT and EU. Both techniques were used to determine the presence, size, and location of urinary stone, and the presence or absence of secondary signs was also evaluated. The existence of ureteral stone was confirmed by its removal or spontaneous passage during follow-up. The absence of a stone was determined on the basis of the clinical and radiological evidence. Results: Twenty-one of the 30 patients had one or more ureteral stones and nine had no stone. CT depicted 22 of 23 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone, and no calculus in all nine without a stone. The sensitivity and specificity of UCT were 96% and 100%, respectively. EU disclosed 14 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone and no calculus in eight of the nine without a stone. UCT and EU demonstrated secondary signs of ureterolithiasis in 15 and 17 patients, respectively. Conclusion: For the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain, UCT is an excellent modality with high sensitivity and specificity. In near future it may replace EU.

AB - Objective: To compare the usefulness of unenhanced spiral CT (UCT) with that of excretory urography (EU) in patients with acute flank pain. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients presenting with acute flank pain underwent both UCT and EU. Both techniques were used to determine the presence, size, and location of urinary stone, and the presence or absence of secondary signs was also evaluated. The existence of ureteral stone was confirmed by its removal or spontaneous passage during follow-up. The absence of a stone was determined on the basis of the clinical and radiological evidence. Results: Twenty-one of the 30 patients had one or more ureteral stones and nine had no stone. CT depicted 22 of 23 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone, and no calculus in all nine without a stone. The sensitivity and specificity of UCT were 96% and 100%, respectively. EU disclosed 14 calculi in the 21 patients with a stone and no calculus in eight of the nine without a stone. UCT and EU demonstrated secondary signs of ureterolithiasis in 15 and 17 patients, respectively. Conclusion: For the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain, UCT is an excellent modality with high sensitivity and specificity. In near future it may replace EU.

KW - Stone

KW - Unenhanced CT Excretory urography Ureter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035233790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035233790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11752964

AN - SCOPUS:0035233790

VL - 2

SP - 14

EP - 20

JO - Korean Journal of Radiology

JF - Korean Journal of Radiology

SN - 1229-6929

IS - 1

ER -