Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality

Jinhyuk Choi, Youngsun Kim, Jeonghyun Kim

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the advent of portable projectors (also embedded in a smart phone), projection based augmented reality (AR) will be an attractive form of AR as the augmentation is made directly in real space (instead of on the video screen). Several interaction methods for "Procam" systems, also applicable to projection based AR, have been developed, but their comparative usability has not been studied in depth. In this paper, we compare the usability of four representative interaction methods, applied to the menu selection task, for the hand-held projection based AR. The four menu selection methods studied are formed by combinations of two types of cursor control (projector cursor vs. on-device touch screen), and two types of item selection (explicit click vs. crossing). Experimental results have shown that the menu selection task was most efficient, usable and preferred when the projector cursor with the crossing widget was used. Furthermore, the task performance was not statistically different between using the dominant, non-dominant hand and even both hands.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011
Pages233-234
Number of pages2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Dec 26
Event2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011 - Basel, Switzerland
Duration: 2011 Oct 262011 Oct 29

Other

Other2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011
CountrySwitzerland
CityBasel
Period11/10/2611/10/29

Fingerprint

Augmented reality
Touch screens

Keywords

  • Augmented Reality
  • Interaction
  • Menu Selection
  • Projection based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Choi, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2011). Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality. In 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011 (pp. 233-234). [6092392] https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092392

Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality. / Choi, Jinhyuk; Kim, Youngsun; Kim, Jeonghyun.

2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011. 2011. p. 233-234 6092392.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Choi, J, Kim, Y & Kim, J 2011, Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality. in 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011., 6092392, pp. 233-234, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011, Basel, Switzerland, 11/10/26. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092392
Choi J, Kim Y, Kim J. Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality. In 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011. 2011. p. 233-234. 6092392 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092392
Choi, Jinhyuk ; Kim, Youngsun ; Kim, Jeonghyun. / Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality. 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011. 2011. pp. 233-234
@inproceedings{14f6ec2c5e8e40bdb7187331fc77772b,
title = "Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality",
abstract = "With the advent of portable projectors (also embedded in a smart phone), projection based augmented reality (AR) will be an attractive form of AR as the augmentation is made directly in real space (instead of on the video screen). Several interaction methods for {"}Procam{"} systems, also applicable to projection based AR, have been developed, but their comparative usability has not been studied in depth. In this paper, we compare the usability of four representative interaction methods, applied to the menu selection task, for the hand-held projection based AR. The four menu selection methods studied are formed by combinations of two types of cursor control (projector cursor vs. on-device touch screen), and two types of item selection (explicit click vs. crossing). Experimental results have shown that the menu selection task was most efficient, usable and preferred when the projector cursor with the crossing widget was used. Furthermore, the task performance was not statistically different between using the dominant, non-dominant hand and even both hands.",
keywords = "Augmented Reality, Interaction, Menu Selection, Projection based",
author = "Jinhyuk Choi and Youngsun Kim and Jeonghyun Kim",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092392",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781457721830",
pages = "233--234",
booktitle = "2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality

AU - Choi, Jinhyuk

AU - Kim, Youngsun

AU - Kim, Jeonghyun

PY - 2011/12/26

Y1 - 2011/12/26

N2 - With the advent of portable projectors (also embedded in a smart phone), projection based augmented reality (AR) will be an attractive form of AR as the augmentation is made directly in real space (instead of on the video screen). Several interaction methods for "Procam" systems, also applicable to projection based AR, have been developed, but their comparative usability has not been studied in depth. In this paper, we compare the usability of four representative interaction methods, applied to the menu selection task, for the hand-held projection based AR. The four menu selection methods studied are formed by combinations of two types of cursor control (projector cursor vs. on-device touch screen), and two types of item selection (explicit click vs. crossing). Experimental results have shown that the menu selection task was most efficient, usable and preferred when the projector cursor with the crossing widget was used. Furthermore, the task performance was not statistically different between using the dominant, non-dominant hand and even both hands.

AB - With the advent of portable projectors (also embedded in a smart phone), projection based augmented reality (AR) will be an attractive form of AR as the augmentation is made directly in real space (instead of on the video screen). Several interaction methods for "Procam" systems, also applicable to projection based AR, have been developed, but their comparative usability has not been studied in depth. In this paper, we compare the usability of four representative interaction methods, applied to the menu selection task, for the hand-held projection based AR. The four menu selection methods studied are formed by combinations of two types of cursor control (projector cursor vs. on-device touch screen), and two types of item selection (explicit click vs. crossing). Experimental results have shown that the menu selection task was most efficient, usable and preferred when the projector cursor with the crossing widget was used. Furthermore, the task performance was not statistically different between using the dominant, non-dominant hand and even both hands.

KW - Augmented Reality

KW - Interaction

KW - Menu Selection

KW - Projection based

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84055192882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84055192882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092392

DO - 10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092392

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84055192882

SN - 9781457721830

SP - 233

EP - 234

BT - 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2011

ER -