Use of the angle of progression on ultrasonography to predict spontaneous onset of labor within 7 days

Geum Joon Cho, Hye Ri Hong, Hyun Joo Seol, Bo Hae Koo, Soon Cheol Hong, Min Jeong Oh, Hai Joong Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between angle of progression (AoP) on ultrasonography at 37-40 weeks' gestation and delivery within 7 days. Methods: This prospective study was conducted between January 2013 and May 2013 at Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea. Nulliparous women between 37/0 and 40/3 weeks' gestation with a singleton fetus, intact membrane, and cephalic presentation from January 2013 to May 2013 were enrolled. To evaluate the cervical parameters of cervical length and AoP, transvaginal and transperineal ultrasonography were performed, respectively. We then assessed the relationship between cervical parameters and onset of labor within 7 days by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Women who underwent spontaneous onset of labor within 7 days had a significantly shorter cervical length and AoP than those who underwent labor after 7 days. Logistic regression analysis showed that a larger AoP was an independent predictor of spontaneous labor within 7 days. Conclusions: A larger AoP was significantly associated with spontaneous onset of labor within 7 days. These findings may be useful for counseling patients regarding the management of term pregnancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-189
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Perinatal Medicine
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 1

Keywords

  • Angle of progression
  • Cervical length
  • Labor
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of the angle of progression on ultrasonography to predict spontaneous onset of labor within 7 days'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this