Use of the tail moment of the lymphocytes to evaluate DNA damage in human biomonitoring studies

Eun Il Lee, Eunha Oh, Joohyun Lee, Dong Geun Sul, Juneyoung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Comet assay has gained increasing popularity for use in human biomonitoring or epidemiologic studies; however, one of the shortcomings of the Comet assay is a lack of agreement on a single appropriate Comet parameter that is capable of adequately describing observed DNA damages. Among the tail parameters of Comet features, the most frequently used are the tail moments (both the Olive tail moment and the extent tail moment), the tail DNA, and the tail length. Some studies comparing Comet parameters have been found in cell toxicity research, but there are few comparative studies that use human biomonitoring or epidemiologic data. In this study, we evaluate those four tail parameters in both high and low DNA damaged cells with the use of epidemiologic data. To do this, a new graphical approach, the so-called quantile dispersion graphs (QDGs) are used. In a comparison of an exposed group and a control group, either the tail moment or tail DNA is preferable to the tail length. With respect to providing smaller variability in quantiles for the amount of DNA damage, however, the tail moment is the preferred parameter for both groups. Moreover, the tail moment provides the most stable estimates for DNA damage because it has a larger degree of uniformity in quantile dispersions. To study high degrees of damage from toxic exposure using B cells or G cells, however, the tail DNA showed more significant discrepancies than the other parameters, in terms of both the mean differences and the graphical differences between the two groups. In view of this result, it is suggested that both the tail moment and the tail DNA be presented as tail parameters in human biomonitoring studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-132
Number of pages12
JournalToxicological Sciences
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Lymphocytes
Environmental Monitoring
DNA Damage
Tail
DNA
Assays
Comet Assay
Poisons
Dispersions
Toxicity
Cells
Gastrin-Secreting Cells
Olea

Keywords

  • Comet assay
  • DNA damage
  • Extent tail moment
  • Lymphocytes
  • Olive tail moment
  • Quantile dispersion graphs
  • Tail DNA
  • Tail length
  • Tail moment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Cite this

Use of the tail moment of the lymphocytes to evaluate DNA damage in human biomonitoring studies. / Lee, Eun Il; Oh, Eunha; Lee, Joohyun; Sul, Dong Geun; Lee, Juneyoung.

In: Toxicological Sciences, Vol. 81, No. 1, 01.09.2004, p. 121-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{794f32a921ed45dd98aaf1e5bf786fba,
title = "Use of the tail moment of the lymphocytes to evaluate DNA damage in human biomonitoring studies",
abstract = "The Comet assay has gained increasing popularity for use in human biomonitoring or epidemiologic studies; however, one of the shortcomings of the Comet assay is a lack of agreement on a single appropriate Comet parameter that is capable of adequately describing observed DNA damages. Among the tail parameters of Comet features, the most frequently used are the tail moments (both the Olive tail moment and the extent tail moment), the tail DNA, and the tail length. Some studies comparing Comet parameters have been found in cell toxicity research, but there are few comparative studies that use human biomonitoring or epidemiologic data. In this study, we evaluate those four tail parameters in both high and low DNA damaged cells with the use of epidemiologic data. To do this, a new graphical approach, the so-called quantile dispersion graphs (QDGs) are used. In a comparison of an exposed group and a control group, either the tail moment or tail DNA is preferable to the tail length. With respect to providing smaller variability in quantiles for the amount of DNA damage, however, the tail moment is the preferred parameter for both groups. Moreover, the tail moment provides the most stable estimates for DNA damage because it has a larger degree of uniformity in quantile dispersions. To study high degrees of damage from toxic exposure using B cells or G cells, however, the tail DNA showed more significant discrepancies than the other parameters, in terms of both the mean differences and the graphical differences between the two groups. In view of this result, it is suggested that both the tail moment and the tail DNA be presented as tail parameters in human biomonitoring studies.",
keywords = "Comet assay, DNA damage, Extent tail moment, Lymphocytes, Olive tail moment, Quantile dispersion graphs, Tail DNA, Tail length, Tail moment",
author = "Lee, {Eun Il} and Eunha Oh and Joohyun Lee and Sul, {Dong Geun} and Juneyoung Lee",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/toxsci/kfh184",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "121--132",
journal = "Toxicological Sciences",
issn = "1096-6080",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the tail moment of the lymphocytes to evaluate DNA damage in human biomonitoring studies

AU - Lee, Eun Il

AU - Oh, Eunha

AU - Lee, Joohyun

AU - Sul, Dong Geun

AU - Lee, Juneyoung

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

N2 - The Comet assay has gained increasing popularity for use in human biomonitoring or epidemiologic studies; however, one of the shortcomings of the Comet assay is a lack of agreement on a single appropriate Comet parameter that is capable of adequately describing observed DNA damages. Among the tail parameters of Comet features, the most frequently used are the tail moments (both the Olive tail moment and the extent tail moment), the tail DNA, and the tail length. Some studies comparing Comet parameters have been found in cell toxicity research, but there are few comparative studies that use human biomonitoring or epidemiologic data. In this study, we evaluate those four tail parameters in both high and low DNA damaged cells with the use of epidemiologic data. To do this, a new graphical approach, the so-called quantile dispersion graphs (QDGs) are used. In a comparison of an exposed group and a control group, either the tail moment or tail DNA is preferable to the tail length. With respect to providing smaller variability in quantiles for the amount of DNA damage, however, the tail moment is the preferred parameter for both groups. Moreover, the tail moment provides the most stable estimates for DNA damage because it has a larger degree of uniformity in quantile dispersions. To study high degrees of damage from toxic exposure using B cells or G cells, however, the tail DNA showed more significant discrepancies than the other parameters, in terms of both the mean differences and the graphical differences between the two groups. In view of this result, it is suggested that both the tail moment and the tail DNA be presented as tail parameters in human biomonitoring studies.

AB - The Comet assay has gained increasing popularity for use in human biomonitoring or epidemiologic studies; however, one of the shortcomings of the Comet assay is a lack of agreement on a single appropriate Comet parameter that is capable of adequately describing observed DNA damages. Among the tail parameters of Comet features, the most frequently used are the tail moments (both the Olive tail moment and the extent tail moment), the tail DNA, and the tail length. Some studies comparing Comet parameters have been found in cell toxicity research, but there are few comparative studies that use human biomonitoring or epidemiologic data. In this study, we evaluate those four tail parameters in both high and low DNA damaged cells with the use of epidemiologic data. To do this, a new graphical approach, the so-called quantile dispersion graphs (QDGs) are used. In a comparison of an exposed group and a control group, either the tail moment or tail DNA is preferable to the tail length. With respect to providing smaller variability in quantiles for the amount of DNA damage, however, the tail moment is the preferred parameter for both groups. Moreover, the tail moment provides the most stable estimates for DNA damage because it has a larger degree of uniformity in quantile dispersions. To study high degrees of damage from toxic exposure using B cells or G cells, however, the tail DNA showed more significant discrepancies than the other parameters, in terms of both the mean differences and the graphical differences between the two groups. In view of this result, it is suggested that both the tail moment and the tail DNA be presented as tail parameters in human biomonitoring studies.

KW - Comet assay

KW - DNA damage

KW - Extent tail moment

KW - Lymphocytes

KW - Olive tail moment

KW - Quantile dispersion graphs

KW - Tail DNA

KW - Tail length

KW - Tail moment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444252436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444252436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/toxsci/kfh184

DO - 10.1093/toxsci/kfh184

M3 - Article

C2 - 15178808

AN - SCOPUS:4444252436

VL - 81

SP - 121

EP - 132

JO - Toxicological Sciences

JF - Toxicological Sciences

SN - 1096-6080

IS - 1

ER -