Usefulness of comorbidity indices in operative gastric cancer cases

Se Min Hwang, Seok-Jun Yoon, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Hyonggin An, Sang Hoo Kim, Min Ho Kyeong, Eun Kyoung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of the following four comorbidity indices in gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Cumulative Illness rating scale (CIRS), Index of Co-existent Disease (ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein Scale (KFS). Methods : The study subjects were 614 adults who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at K hospital between 2005 and 2007. We examined the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of 4 comorbidity indices for 50 patients. Reliability was evaluated with Spearman rho coefficients for CCI and CIRS, while Kappa values were used for the ICED and KFS indices. Logistic regression was used to determine how these comorbidity indices affected unplanned readmission and death. Multiple regression was used for determining if the comorbidity indices affected length of stay and hospital costs. Results : The test-retest reliability of CCI and CIRS was substantial (Spearman rho=0.746 and 0.775, respectively), while for ICED and KFS was moderate (Kappa=0.476 and 0.504, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of the CCI, CIRS, and ICED was moderate (Spearman rho=0.580 and 0.668, and Kappa=0.433, respectively), but for KFS was fair (Kappa=0.383). According to the results from logistic regression, unplanned readmissions and deaths were not significantly different between the comorbidity index scores. But, according to the results from multiple linear regression, the CIRS group showed a significantly increased length of hospital stay (p<0.01). Additionally, CCI showed a significant association with increased hospital costs (p<0.01). Conclusions : This study suggests that the CCI index may be useful in the estimation of comorbidities associated with hospital costs, while the CIRS index may be useful where estimatation of comorbiditie associated with the length of hospital stay are concerned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Stomach Neoplasms
Comorbidity
Length of Stay
Hospital Costs
Logistic Models
Reproducibility of Results
Linear Models

Keywords

  • Comorbidity
  • Comorbidity index
  • Gastric cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Usefulness of comorbidity indices in operative gastric cancer cases. / Hwang, Se Min; Yoon, Seok-Jun; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; An, Hyonggin; Kim, Sang Hoo; Kyeong, Min Ho; Lee, Eun Kyoung.

In: Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 49-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{814e18568b1a42edbe1fbbaced77f331,
title = "Usefulness of comorbidity indices in operative gastric cancer cases",
abstract = "Objectives : The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of the following four comorbidity indices in gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Cumulative Illness rating scale (CIRS), Index of Co-existent Disease (ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein Scale (KFS). Methods : The study subjects were 614 adults who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at K hospital between 2005 and 2007. We examined the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of 4 comorbidity indices for 50 patients. Reliability was evaluated with Spearman rho coefficients for CCI and CIRS, while Kappa values were used for the ICED and KFS indices. Logistic regression was used to determine how these comorbidity indices affected unplanned readmission and death. Multiple regression was used for determining if the comorbidity indices affected length of stay and hospital costs. Results : The test-retest reliability of CCI and CIRS was substantial (Spearman rho=0.746 and 0.775, respectively), while for ICED and KFS was moderate (Kappa=0.476 and 0.504, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of the CCI, CIRS, and ICED was moderate (Spearman rho=0.580 and 0.668, and Kappa=0.433, respectively), but for KFS was fair (Kappa=0.383). According to the results from logistic regression, unplanned readmissions and deaths were not significantly different between the comorbidity index scores. But, according to the results from multiple linear regression, the CIRS group showed a significantly increased length of hospital stay (p<0.01). Additionally, CCI showed a significant association with increased hospital costs (p<0.01). Conclusions : This study suggests that the CCI index may be useful in the estimation of comorbidities associated with hospital costs, while the CIRS index may be useful where estimatation of comorbiditie associated with the length of hospital stay are concerned.",
keywords = "Comorbidity, Comorbidity index, Gastric cancer",
author = "Hwang, {Se Min} and Seok-Jun Yoon and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Hyonggin An and Kim, {Sang Hoo} and Kyeong, {Min Ho} and Lee, {Eun Kyoung}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.1.49",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health",
issn = "1975-8375",
publisher = "Korean Society for Preventive Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usefulness of comorbidity indices in operative gastric cancer cases

AU - Hwang, Se Min

AU - Yoon, Seok-Jun

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - An, Hyonggin

AU - Kim, Sang Hoo

AU - Kyeong, Min Ho

AU - Lee, Eun Kyoung

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Objectives : The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of the following four comorbidity indices in gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Cumulative Illness rating scale (CIRS), Index of Co-existent Disease (ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein Scale (KFS). Methods : The study subjects were 614 adults who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at K hospital between 2005 and 2007. We examined the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of 4 comorbidity indices for 50 patients. Reliability was evaluated with Spearman rho coefficients for CCI and CIRS, while Kappa values were used for the ICED and KFS indices. Logistic regression was used to determine how these comorbidity indices affected unplanned readmission and death. Multiple regression was used for determining if the comorbidity indices affected length of stay and hospital costs. Results : The test-retest reliability of CCI and CIRS was substantial (Spearman rho=0.746 and 0.775, respectively), while for ICED and KFS was moderate (Kappa=0.476 and 0.504, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of the CCI, CIRS, and ICED was moderate (Spearman rho=0.580 and 0.668, and Kappa=0.433, respectively), but for KFS was fair (Kappa=0.383). According to the results from logistic regression, unplanned readmissions and deaths were not significantly different between the comorbidity index scores. But, according to the results from multiple linear regression, the CIRS group showed a significantly increased length of hospital stay (p<0.01). Additionally, CCI showed a significant association with increased hospital costs (p<0.01). Conclusions : This study suggests that the CCI index may be useful in the estimation of comorbidities associated with hospital costs, while the CIRS index may be useful where estimatation of comorbiditie associated with the length of hospital stay are concerned.

AB - Objectives : The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of the following four comorbidity indices in gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Cumulative Illness rating scale (CIRS), Index of Co-existent Disease (ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein Scale (KFS). Methods : The study subjects were 614 adults who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at K hospital between 2005 and 2007. We examined the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of 4 comorbidity indices for 50 patients. Reliability was evaluated with Spearman rho coefficients for CCI and CIRS, while Kappa values were used for the ICED and KFS indices. Logistic regression was used to determine how these comorbidity indices affected unplanned readmission and death. Multiple regression was used for determining if the comorbidity indices affected length of stay and hospital costs. Results : The test-retest reliability of CCI and CIRS was substantial (Spearman rho=0.746 and 0.775, respectively), while for ICED and KFS was moderate (Kappa=0.476 and 0.504, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of the CCI, CIRS, and ICED was moderate (Spearman rho=0.580 and 0.668, and Kappa=0.433, respectively), but for KFS was fair (Kappa=0.383). According to the results from logistic regression, unplanned readmissions and deaths were not significantly different between the comorbidity index scores. But, according to the results from multiple linear regression, the CIRS group showed a significantly increased length of hospital stay (p<0.01). Additionally, CCI showed a significant association with increased hospital costs (p<0.01). Conclusions : This study suggests that the CCI index may be useful in the estimation of comorbidities associated with hospital costs, while the CIRS index may be useful where estimatation of comorbiditie associated with the length of hospital stay are concerned.

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Comorbidity index

KW - Gastric cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63449097292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63449097292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.1.49

DO - 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.1.49

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

JF - Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

SN - 1975-8375

IS - 1

ER -