User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control

Jong Gil Ahn, Hyunseok Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Namgyu Kim

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

In this poster, we present an experiment that compares three forms of interaction to study the user behavior with regards to the effects of camera view for in-situ robot control. We compared three hand-held interfaces with: (1) no camera view (Nominal), (2) a camera view/aim is always fixed toward the robot (Fixed) and (3) a camera view with user controlled aim (Free). The three approaches represent different balances between information availability, interface accessibility and the amount of induced attentional shifts. Experiment results have shown that all three interaction models exhibited similar task performance even though the Fixed type induced much less attentional shifts. On the other hand, the users much preferred the Nominal and Free type. Users mostly ignored the camera view despite having to shift one's attention excessively, due to the lack of visual quality, realistic scale and depth information.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Pages173-174
Number of pages2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Apr 26
Event7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI'12 - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: 2012 Mar 52012 Mar 8

Other

Other7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI'12
CountryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period12/3/512/3/8

Fingerprint

Cameras
Robots
End effectors
Experiments
Availability

Keywords

  • attention
  • human-robot interaction
  • robot control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

Ahn, J. G., Yang, H., Kim, J., & Kim, N. (2012). User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control. In HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 173-174) https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157741

User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control. / Ahn, Jong Gil; Yang, Hyunseok; Kim, Jeonghyun; Kim, Namgyu.

HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 2012. p. 173-174.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ahn, JG, Yang, H, Kim, J & Kim, N 2012, User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control. in HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. pp. 173-174, 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI'12, Boston, MA, United States, 12/3/5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157741
Ahn JG, Yang H, Kim J, Kim N. User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control. In HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 2012. p. 173-174 https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157741
Ahn, Jong Gil ; Yang, Hyunseok ; Kim, Jeonghyun ; Kim, Namgyu. / User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control. HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 2012. pp. 173-174
@inproceedings{3e203a3503c041c59f88d7c987568c76,
title = "User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control",
abstract = "In this poster, we present an experiment that compares three forms of interaction to study the user behavior with regards to the effects of camera view for in-situ robot control. We compared three hand-held interfaces with: (1) no camera view (Nominal), (2) a camera view/aim is always fixed toward the robot (Fixed) and (3) a camera view with user controlled aim (Free). The three approaches represent different balances between information availability, interface accessibility and the amount of induced attentional shifts. Experiment results have shown that all three interaction models exhibited similar task performance even though the Fixed type induced much less attentional shifts. On the other hand, the users much preferred the Nominal and Free type. Users mostly ignored the camera view despite having to shift one's attention excessively, due to the lack of visual quality, realistic scale and depth information.",
keywords = "attention, human-robot interaction, robot control",
author = "Ahn, {Jong Gil} and Hyunseok Yang and Jeonghyun Kim and Namgyu Kim",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1145/2157689.2157741",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450310635",
pages = "173--174",
booktitle = "HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - User attentive behavior with camera view for in-situ robot control

AU - Ahn, Jong Gil

AU - Yang, Hyunseok

AU - Kim, Jeonghyun

AU - Kim, Namgyu

PY - 2012/4/26

Y1 - 2012/4/26

N2 - In this poster, we present an experiment that compares three forms of interaction to study the user behavior with regards to the effects of camera view for in-situ robot control. We compared three hand-held interfaces with: (1) no camera view (Nominal), (2) a camera view/aim is always fixed toward the robot (Fixed) and (3) a camera view with user controlled aim (Free). The three approaches represent different balances between information availability, interface accessibility and the amount of induced attentional shifts. Experiment results have shown that all three interaction models exhibited similar task performance even though the Fixed type induced much less attentional shifts. On the other hand, the users much preferred the Nominal and Free type. Users mostly ignored the camera view despite having to shift one's attention excessively, due to the lack of visual quality, realistic scale and depth information.

AB - In this poster, we present an experiment that compares three forms of interaction to study the user behavior with regards to the effects of camera view for in-situ robot control. We compared three hand-held interfaces with: (1) no camera view (Nominal), (2) a camera view/aim is always fixed toward the robot (Fixed) and (3) a camera view with user controlled aim (Free). The three approaches represent different balances between information availability, interface accessibility and the amount of induced attentional shifts. Experiment results have shown that all three interaction models exhibited similar task performance even though the Fixed type induced much less attentional shifts. On the other hand, the users much preferred the Nominal and Free type. Users mostly ignored the camera view despite having to shift one's attention excessively, due to the lack of visual quality, realistic scale and depth information.

KW - attention

KW - human-robot interaction

KW - robot control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859993174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859993174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2157689.2157741

DO - 10.1145/2157689.2157741

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84859993174

SN - 9781450310635

SP - 173

EP - 174

BT - HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

ER -