Using neuropharmacology to distinguish between excitatory and inhibitory movement detection mechanisms in the fly Calliphora erythrocephala

A. Schmid, H. Bülthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By combining neuropharmacology and electrophysiology, we tried to determine whether the main neuronal mechanism responsible for direction-selective motion detection in the fly is based on an excitatory or an inhibitory synaptic interaction. By blocking inhibitory interactions with picrotoxinin, an antagonist of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, we could abolish most of the directional selectivity of a large-field movement-sensitive neuron (H1-cell) in the lobula plate of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. These modifications are similar to changes observed in the optomotor response of the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster after application of picrotoxinin (Bülthoff and Bülthoff 1987a, b). Assuming a simplified logical model, these results are compatible with inhibitory synaptic interactions at the level of the elementary movement detectors. The picrotoxinin-induced changes in direction selectivity are not due to modifications of the peripheral visual processing in the retina and lamina. This was shown by simultaneous recordings of the electroretinogram and the H1-cell. The latencies between drug injections into various parts of the brain and their first effects on the H1-cell suggest that the inhibitory mechanism for motion detection is located in the medulla rather than in the lobula plate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-80
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Cybernetics
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1988 Jul

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Computer Science(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Using neuropharmacology to distinguish between excitatory and inhibitory movement detection mechanisms in the fly Calliphora erythrocephala'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this