Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma: A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06)

Ji Hyeon Joo, Young Seok Kim, Byung Chul Cho, Chi Young Jeong, Won Park, Hak Jae Kim, Won Sup Yoon, Mee Sun Yoon, Ji Yoon Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Youngmin Choi, Joo Young Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose To determine inter-observer variability in target volume definition of cervical cancer in radical and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) settings. Methods Eight physicians contoured CTVs of 2 patients underwent definitive and postoperative RT. Each volume was analyzed using the individual/median volume ratio and generalized conformity index (CIgen). And center of mass (COM) of each contour was calculated. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). Results For definitive RT, the individual/median volume ratio ranged from 0.51 to 1.41, and CIgen was 0.531. Mean 3-dimensional distances of average to each COM were 7.8 mm. For postoperative RT setting, corresponding values were 0.65-1.38, 0.563, and 5.3 mm. Kappa value of expert agreement was 0.65 and 0.67, respectively. STAPLE estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa measures of inter-physician agreement were 0.73, 0.98, and 0.65 for the definitive and 0.75, 0.98, and 0.67 for the adjuvant radiotherapy setting. The largest difference was observed in the superior-inferior direction, particularly in the upper vagina and the common iliac area.Conclusion As there was still some variability in target delineation, more detailed guidelines for target volume delineation and continuing education would help to reduce this uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0173476
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
uterine cervical neoplasms
Oncology
Radiotherapy
radiotherapy
Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Carcinoma
Radiation
Physicians
Observer Variation
physicians
Continuing Education
adjuvants
Vagina
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Uncertainty
adult education
Guidelines
vagina
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Joo, J. H., Kim, Y. S., Cho, B. C., Jeong, C. Y., Park, W., Kim, H. J., ... Kim, J. Y. (2017). Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma: A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06). PLoS One, 12(3), [e0173476]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173476

Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma : A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06). / Joo, Ji Hyeon; Kim, Young Seok; Cho, Byung Chul; Jeong, Chi Young; Park, Won; Kim, Hak Jae; Yoon, Won Sup; Yoon, Mee Sun; Kim, Ji Yoon; Choi, Jin Hwa; Choi, Youngmin; Kim, Joo Young.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 3, e0173476, 01.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joo, JH, Kim, YS, Cho, BC, Jeong, CY, Park, W, Kim, HJ, Yoon, WS, Yoon, MS, Kim, JY, Choi, JH, Choi, Y & Kim, JY 2017, 'Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma: A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06)', PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 3, e0173476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173476
Joo, Ji Hyeon ; Kim, Young Seok ; Cho, Byung Chul ; Jeong, Chi Young ; Park, Won ; Kim, Hak Jae ; Yoon, Won Sup ; Yoon, Mee Sun ; Kim, Ji Yoon ; Choi, Jin Hwa ; Choi, Youngmin ; Kim, Joo Young. / Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma : A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06). In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 3.
@article{059fe841e29c484f8e716d1b73aaa6d6,
title = "Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma: A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06)",
abstract = "Purpose To determine inter-observer variability in target volume definition of cervical cancer in radical and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) settings. Methods Eight physicians contoured CTVs of 2 patients underwent definitive and postoperative RT. Each volume was analyzed using the individual/median volume ratio and generalized conformity index (CIgen). And center of mass (COM) of each contour was calculated. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). Results For definitive RT, the individual/median volume ratio ranged from 0.51 to 1.41, and CIgen was 0.531. Mean 3-dimensional distances of average to each COM were 7.8 mm. For postoperative RT setting, corresponding values were 0.65-1.38, 0.563, and 5.3 mm. Kappa value of expert agreement was 0.65 and 0.67, respectively. STAPLE estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa measures of inter-physician agreement were 0.73, 0.98, and 0.65 for the definitive and 0.75, 0.98, and 0.67 for the adjuvant radiotherapy setting. The largest difference was observed in the superior-inferior direction, particularly in the upper vagina and the common iliac area.Conclusion As there was still some variability in target delineation, more detailed guidelines for target volume delineation and continuing education would help to reduce this uncertainty.",
author = "Joo, {Ji Hyeon} and Kim, {Young Seok} and Cho, {Byung Chul} and Jeong, {Chi Young} and Won Park and Kim, {Hak Jae} and Yoon, {Won Sup} and Yoon, {Mee Sun} and Kim, {Ji Yoon} and Choi, {Jin Hwa} and Youngmin Choi and Kim, {Joo Young}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0173476",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma

T2 - A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06)

AU - Joo, Ji Hyeon

AU - Kim, Young Seok

AU - Cho, Byung Chul

AU - Jeong, Chi Young

AU - Park, Won

AU - Kim, Hak Jae

AU - Yoon, Won Sup

AU - Yoon, Mee Sun

AU - Kim, Ji Yoon

AU - Choi, Jin Hwa

AU - Choi, Youngmin

AU - Kim, Joo Young

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Purpose To determine inter-observer variability in target volume definition of cervical cancer in radical and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) settings. Methods Eight physicians contoured CTVs of 2 patients underwent definitive and postoperative RT. Each volume was analyzed using the individual/median volume ratio and generalized conformity index (CIgen). And center of mass (COM) of each contour was calculated. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). Results For definitive RT, the individual/median volume ratio ranged from 0.51 to 1.41, and CIgen was 0.531. Mean 3-dimensional distances of average to each COM were 7.8 mm. For postoperative RT setting, corresponding values were 0.65-1.38, 0.563, and 5.3 mm. Kappa value of expert agreement was 0.65 and 0.67, respectively. STAPLE estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa measures of inter-physician agreement were 0.73, 0.98, and 0.65 for the definitive and 0.75, 0.98, and 0.67 for the adjuvant radiotherapy setting. The largest difference was observed in the superior-inferior direction, particularly in the upper vagina and the common iliac area.Conclusion As there was still some variability in target delineation, more detailed guidelines for target volume delineation and continuing education would help to reduce this uncertainty.

AB - Purpose To determine inter-observer variability in target volume definition of cervical cancer in radical and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) settings. Methods Eight physicians contoured CTVs of 2 patients underwent definitive and postoperative RT. Each volume was analyzed using the individual/median volume ratio and generalized conformity index (CIgen). And center of mass (COM) of each contour was calculated. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). Results For definitive RT, the individual/median volume ratio ranged from 0.51 to 1.41, and CIgen was 0.531. Mean 3-dimensional distances of average to each COM were 7.8 mm. For postoperative RT setting, corresponding values were 0.65-1.38, 0.563, and 5.3 mm. Kappa value of expert agreement was 0.65 and 0.67, respectively. STAPLE estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa measures of inter-physician agreement were 0.73, 0.98, and 0.65 for the definitive and 0.75, 0.98, and 0.67 for the adjuvant radiotherapy setting. The largest difference was observed in the superior-inferior direction, particularly in the upper vagina and the common iliac area.Conclusion As there was still some variability in target delineation, more detailed guidelines for target volume delineation and continuing education would help to reduce this uncertainty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015427703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015427703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173476

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173476

M3 - Article

C2 - 28301492

AN - SCOPUS:85015427703

VL - 12

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0173476

ER -