Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels

D. H. Whalen, Wei Rong Chen, Mark K. Tiede, Hosung Nam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Speech, though communicative, is quite variable both in articulation and acoustics, and it has often been claimed that articulation is more variable. Here we compared variability in articulation and acoustics for 32 speakers in the X-ray microbeam database (XRMB; Westbury, 1994). Variability in tongue, lip and jaw positions for nine English vowels (/u, ʊ, æ, ɑ, ʌ, ɔ, ɛ, ɪ, i/) was compared to that of the corresponding formant values. The domains were made comparable by creating three-dimensional spaces for each: the first three principal components from an analysis of a 14-dimensional space for articulation, and an F1xF2xF3 space for acoustics. More variability occurred in the articulation than the acoustics for half of the speakers, while the reverse was true for the other half. Individual tokens were further from the articulatory median than the acoustic median for 40–60% of tokens across speakers. A separate analysis of three non-low front vowels (/ɛ, ɪ, i/, for which the XRMB system provides the most direct articulatory evidence) did not differ from the omnibus analysis. Speakers tended to be either more or less variable consistently across vowels. Across speakers, there was a positive correlation between articulatory and acoustic variability, both for all vowels and for just the three non-low front vowels. Although the XRMB is an incomplete representation of articulation, it nonetheless provides data for direct comparisons between articulatory and acoustic variability that have not been reported previously. The results indicate that articulation is not more variable than acoustics, that speakers had relatively consistent variability across vowels, and that articulatory and acoustic variability were related for the vowels themselves.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Phonetics
Volume68
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 May 1

Fingerprint

Dental Articulators
Acoustics
acoustics
Articulator
English Vowels
Formants
Lip
Articulation
Principal Component Analysis
Jaw
Tongue
X-Rays
Databases

Keywords

  • Acoustics
  • Articulation
  • English
  • Variability
  • Vowels
  • X-ray microbeam

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels. / Whalen, D. H.; Chen, Wei Rong; Tiede, Mark K.; Nam, Hosung.

In: Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 68, 01.05.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whalen, D. H. ; Chen, Wei Rong ; Tiede, Mark K. ; Nam, Hosung. / Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels. In: Journal of Phonetics. 2018 ; Vol. 68. pp. 1-14.
@article{c46899f4774242ff8319926c104d3a12,
title = "Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels",
abstract = "Speech, though communicative, is quite variable both in articulation and acoustics, and it has often been claimed that articulation is more variable. Here we compared variability in articulation and acoustics for 32 speakers in the X-ray microbeam database (XRMB; Westbury, 1994). Variability in tongue, lip and jaw positions for nine English vowels (/u, ʊ, {\ae}, ɑ, ʌ, ɔ, ɛ, ɪ, i/) was compared to that of the corresponding formant values. The domains were made comparable by creating three-dimensional spaces for each: the first three principal components from an analysis of a 14-dimensional space for articulation, and an F1xF2xF3 space for acoustics. More variability occurred in the articulation than the acoustics for half of the speakers, while the reverse was true for the other half. Individual tokens were further from the articulatory median than the acoustic median for 40–60{\%} of tokens across speakers. A separate analysis of three non-low front vowels (/ɛ, ɪ, i/, for which the XRMB system provides the most direct articulatory evidence) did not differ from the omnibus analysis. Speakers tended to be either more or less variable consistently across vowels. Across speakers, there was a positive correlation between articulatory and acoustic variability, both for all vowels and for just the three non-low front vowels. Although the XRMB is an incomplete representation of articulation, it nonetheless provides data for direct comparisons between articulatory and acoustic variability that have not been reported previously. The results indicate that articulation is not more variable than acoustics, that speakers had relatively consistent variability across vowels, and that articulatory and acoustic variability were related for the vowels themselves.",
keywords = "Acoustics, Articulation, English, Variability, Vowels, X-ray microbeam",
author = "Whalen, {D. H.} and Chen, {Wei Rong} and Tiede, {Mark K.} and Hosung Nam",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.003",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Journal of Phonetics",
issn = "0095-4470",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels

AU - Whalen, D. H.

AU - Chen, Wei Rong

AU - Tiede, Mark K.

AU - Nam, Hosung

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Speech, though communicative, is quite variable both in articulation and acoustics, and it has often been claimed that articulation is more variable. Here we compared variability in articulation and acoustics for 32 speakers in the X-ray microbeam database (XRMB; Westbury, 1994). Variability in tongue, lip and jaw positions for nine English vowels (/u, ʊ, æ, ɑ, ʌ, ɔ, ɛ, ɪ, i/) was compared to that of the corresponding formant values. The domains were made comparable by creating three-dimensional spaces for each: the first three principal components from an analysis of a 14-dimensional space for articulation, and an F1xF2xF3 space for acoustics. More variability occurred in the articulation than the acoustics for half of the speakers, while the reverse was true for the other half. Individual tokens were further from the articulatory median than the acoustic median for 40–60% of tokens across speakers. A separate analysis of three non-low front vowels (/ɛ, ɪ, i/, for which the XRMB system provides the most direct articulatory evidence) did not differ from the omnibus analysis. Speakers tended to be either more or less variable consistently across vowels. Across speakers, there was a positive correlation between articulatory and acoustic variability, both for all vowels and for just the three non-low front vowels. Although the XRMB is an incomplete representation of articulation, it nonetheless provides data for direct comparisons between articulatory and acoustic variability that have not been reported previously. The results indicate that articulation is not more variable than acoustics, that speakers had relatively consistent variability across vowels, and that articulatory and acoustic variability were related for the vowels themselves.

AB - Speech, though communicative, is quite variable both in articulation and acoustics, and it has often been claimed that articulation is more variable. Here we compared variability in articulation and acoustics for 32 speakers in the X-ray microbeam database (XRMB; Westbury, 1994). Variability in tongue, lip and jaw positions for nine English vowels (/u, ʊ, æ, ɑ, ʌ, ɔ, ɛ, ɪ, i/) was compared to that of the corresponding formant values. The domains were made comparable by creating three-dimensional spaces for each: the first three principal components from an analysis of a 14-dimensional space for articulation, and an F1xF2xF3 space for acoustics. More variability occurred in the articulation than the acoustics for half of the speakers, while the reverse was true for the other half. Individual tokens were further from the articulatory median than the acoustic median for 40–60% of tokens across speakers. A separate analysis of three non-low front vowels (/ɛ, ɪ, i/, for which the XRMB system provides the most direct articulatory evidence) did not differ from the omnibus analysis. Speakers tended to be either more or less variable consistently across vowels. Across speakers, there was a positive correlation between articulatory and acoustic variability, both for all vowels and for just the three non-low front vowels. Although the XRMB is an incomplete representation of articulation, it nonetheless provides data for direct comparisons between articulatory and acoustic variability that have not been reported previously. The results indicate that articulation is not more variable than acoustics, that speakers had relatively consistent variability across vowels, and that articulatory and acoustic variability were related for the vowels themselves.

KW - Acoustics

KW - Articulation

KW - English

KW - Variability

KW - Vowels

KW - X-ray microbeam

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042435179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042435179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042435179

VL - 68

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Phonetics

JF - Journal of Phonetics

SN - 0095-4470

ER -