Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review

Il Ho Kim, Carles Muntaner, Faraz Vahid Shahidi, Alejandra Vives, Christophe Vanroelen, Joan Benach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this literature review is to identify whether differences between welfare regimes can manifest diverse consequences for the health effects of insecure and precarious employment, as well as to address challenging issues and implications for future research. Methods: By searching PubMed, PsychINFO, Stork Social Science Citation Index, and Index Lilac, from 1988 to June 2010, a total of 104 original articles were selected (65 on job insecurity; 39 on precarious employment). Results: After classifying selected empirical studies according to a six-regime welfare state typology (Scandinavian, Bismarckian, Southern European, Anglo-Saxon, Eastern European, and East Asian), this systematic review reveals that welfare regimes may be an important determinant of employment-related health. Precarious workers in Scandinavian welfare states report better or equal health status when compared to their permanent counterparts. By contrast, precarious work in the remaining welfare state regimes is found to be associated with adverse health outcomes, including poor self-rated health, musculoskeletal disorders, injuries, and mental health problems. Conclusions: Future research should be conducted by employing conceptual models that specify how macro-economic processes, country-level welfare factors, and individual employment histories and environments relate to employment-related health inequalities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-127
Number of pages29
JournalHealth Policy
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Social Sciences
PubMed
Health Status
Mental Health
Economics
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Kim, I. H., Muntaner, C., Vahid Shahidi, F., Vives, A., Vanroelen, C., & Benach, J. (2012). Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review. Health Policy, 104(2), 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002

Welfare states, flexible employment, and health : A critical review. / Kim, Il Ho; Muntaner, Carles; Vahid Shahidi, Faraz; Vives, Alejandra; Vanroelen, Christophe; Benach, Joan.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 104, No. 2, 01.02.2012, p. 99-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, IH, Muntaner, C, Vahid Shahidi, F, Vives, A, Vanroelen, C & Benach, J 2012, 'Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review', Health Policy, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002
Kim IH, Muntaner C, Vahid Shahidi F, Vives A, Vanroelen C, Benach J. Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review. Health Policy. 2012 Feb 1;104(2):99-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002
Kim, Il Ho ; Muntaner, Carles ; Vahid Shahidi, Faraz ; Vives, Alejandra ; Vanroelen, Christophe ; Benach, Joan. / Welfare states, flexible employment, and health : A critical review. In: Health Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 104, No. 2. pp. 99-127.
@article{4cead8acfcc4403394486ba97fd971f2,
title = "Welfare states, flexible employment, and health: A critical review",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this literature review is to identify whether differences between welfare regimes can manifest diverse consequences for the health effects of insecure and precarious employment, as well as to address challenging issues and implications for future research. Methods: By searching PubMed, PsychINFO, Stork Social Science Citation Index, and Index Lilac, from 1988 to June 2010, a total of 104 original articles were selected (65 on job insecurity; 39 on precarious employment). Results: After classifying selected empirical studies according to a six-regime welfare state typology (Scandinavian, Bismarckian, Southern European, Anglo-Saxon, Eastern European, and East Asian), this systematic review reveals that welfare regimes may be an important determinant of employment-related health. Precarious workers in Scandinavian welfare states report better or equal health status when compared to their permanent counterparts. By contrast, precarious work in the remaining welfare state regimes is found to be associated with adverse health outcomes, including poor self-rated health, musculoskeletal disorders, injuries, and mental health problems. Conclusions: Future research should be conducted by employing conceptual models that specify how macro-economic processes, country-level welfare factors, and individual employment histories and environments relate to employment-related health inequalities.",
keywords = "Health, Job insecurity, Precarious employment, Welfare state",
author = "Kim, {Il Ho} and Carles Muntaner and {Vahid Shahidi}, Faraz and Alejandra Vives and Christophe Vanroelen and Joan Benach",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "99--127",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Welfare states, flexible employment, and health

T2 - A critical review

AU - Kim, Il Ho

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Vahid Shahidi, Faraz

AU - Vives, Alejandra

AU - Vanroelen, Christophe

AU - Benach, Joan

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this literature review is to identify whether differences between welfare regimes can manifest diverse consequences for the health effects of insecure and precarious employment, as well as to address challenging issues and implications for future research. Methods: By searching PubMed, PsychINFO, Stork Social Science Citation Index, and Index Lilac, from 1988 to June 2010, a total of 104 original articles were selected (65 on job insecurity; 39 on precarious employment). Results: After classifying selected empirical studies according to a six-regime welfare state typology (Scandinavian, Bismarckian, Southern European, Anglo-Saxon, Eastern European, and East Asian), this systematic review reveals that welfare regimes may be an important determinant of employment-related health. Precarious workers in Scandinavian welfare states report better or equal health status when compared to their permanent counterparts. By contrast, precarious work in the remaining welfare state regimes is found to be associated with adverse health outcomes, including poor self-rated health, musculoskeletal disorders, injuries, and mental health problems. Conclusions: Future research should be conducted by employing conceptual models that specify how macro-economic processes, country-level welfare factors, and individual employment histories and environments relate to employment-related health inequalities.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this literature review is to identify whether differences between welfare regimes can manifest diverse consequences for the health effects of insecure and precarious employment, as well as to address challenging issues and implications for future research. Methods: By searching PubMed, PsychINFO, Stork Social Science Citation Index, and Index Lilac, from 1988 to June 2010, a total of 104 original articles were selected (65 on job insecurity; 39 on precarious employment). Results: After classifying selected empirical studies according to a six-regime welfare state typology (Scandinavian, Bismarckian, Southern European, Anglo-Saxon, Eastern European, and East Asian), this systematic review reveals that welfare regimes may be an important determinant of employment-related health. Precarious workers in Scandinavian welfare states report better or equal health status when compared to their permanent counterparts. By contrast, precarious work in the remaining welfare state regimes is found to be associated with adverse health outcomes, including poor self-rated health, musculoskeletal disorders, injuries, and mental health problems. Conclusions: Future research should be conducted by employing conceptual models that specify how macro-economic processes, country-level welfare factors, and individual employment histories and environments relate to employment-related health inequalities.

KW - Health

KW - Job insecurity

KW - Precarious employment

KW - Welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855596778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855596778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 22137444

AN - SCOPUS:84855596778

VL - 104

SP - 99

EP - 127

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 2

ER -