TY - JOUR
T1 - What's scene and not seen
T2 - Influences of movement and task upon what we see
AU - Wallis, Guy
AU - Bülthoff, Heinrich
N1 - Funding Information:
Please address all correspondence to G. Wallis, Department of Human Movement Studies, Queensland University, St. Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia. Email: gwallis@hms.qu.edu.au We are grateful to William Hayward, to the editor, and the two referees for helpful comments and suggestions. Guy Wallis was supported by a grant from the Motor Accident Insurance Commission and a Max-Planck Society Research Fellowship.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Studies concerning the processing of natural scenes using eye movement equipment have revealed that observers retain surprisingly little information from one fixation to the next. Other studies, in which fixation remained constant while elements within the scene were changed, have shown that, even without refixation, objects within a scene are surprisingly poorly represented. Although this effect has been studied in some detail in static scenes, there has been relatively little work on scenes as we would normally experience them, namely dynamic and ever changing. This paper describes a comparable form of change blindness in dynamic scenes, in which detection is performed in the presence of simulated observer motion. The study also describes how change blindness is affected by the manner in which the observer interacts with the environment, by comparing detection performance of an observer as the passenger or driver of a car. The experiments show that observer motion reduces the detection of orientation and location changes, and that the task of driving causes a concentration of object analysis on or near the line of motion, relative to passive viewing of the same scene.
AB - Studies concerning the processing of natural scenes using eye movement equipment have revealed that observers retain surprisingly little information from one fixation to the next. Other studies, in which fixation remained constant while elements within the scene were changed, have shown that, even without refixation, objects within a scene are surprisingly poorly represented. Although this effect has been studied in some detail in static scenes, there has been relatively little work on scenes as we would normally experience them, namely dynamic and ever changing. This paper describes a comparable form of change blindness in dynamic scenes, in which detection is performed in the presence of simulated observer motion. The study also describes how change blindness is affected by the manner in which the observer interacts with the environment, by comparing detection performance of an observer as the passenger or driver of a car. The experiments show that observer motion reduces the detection of orientation and location changes, and that the task of driving causes a concentration of object analysis on or near the line of motion, relative to passive viewing of the same scene.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0342471742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/135062800394757
DO - 10.1080/135062800394757
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0342471742
SN - 1350-6285
VL - 7
SP - 175
EP - 190
JO - Visual Cognition
JF - Visual Cognition
IS - 1-3
ER -