Who should bear the resource cost of electronic transaction?

Young Sik Kim, Manjong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using a search theoretic model of money, we examine an optimal allocation of the resource cost of electronic transaction. A transaction using cash incurs a buyer its carrying cost, while an electronic transaction incurs data-processing cost to the payment platform which then raises the resource cost from buyers or sellers using the electronic payment system. An equilibrium allocation of the resource cost implies the seller-take-all-burden scheme by which the payment platform can maximize the volume of electronic transactions by raising the resource cost only from sellers. However, the socially optimal allocation of the resource cost implies the buyer-take-all-burden scheme by which the resource cost should be raised only from buyers in order to maximize welfare.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)270-280
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Macroeconomics
Volume47
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Costs
Resources
Buyers
Seller
Optimal allocation
Burden
Payment
Cash
Electronic payment system
Transaction data

Keywords

  • Cash
  • Electronic payment
  • Resource cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Who should bear the resource cost of electronic transaction? / Kim, Young Sik; Lee, Manjong.

In: Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 47, 01.03.2016, p. 270-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0cd0330328db438ebcd8f601e6a4788e,
title = "Who should bear the resource cost of electronic transaction?",
abstract = "Using a search theoretic model of money, we examine an optimal allocation of the resource cost of electronic transaction. A transaction using cash incurs a buyer its carrying cost, while an electronic transaction incurs data-processing cost to the payment platform which then raises the resource cost from buyers or sellers using the electronic payment system. An equilibrium allocation of the resource cost implies the seller-take-all-burden scheme by which the payment platform can maximize the volume of electronic transactions by raising the resource cost only from sellers. However, the socially optimal allocation of the resource cost implies the buyer-take-all-burden scheme by which the resource cost should be raised only from buyers in order to maximize welfare.",
keywords = "Cash, Electronic payment, Resource cost",
author = "Kim, {Young Sik} and Manjong Lee",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "270--280",
journal = "Journal of Macroeconomics",
issn = "0164-0704",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who should bear the resource cost of electronic transaction?

AU - Kim, Young Sik

AU - Lee, Manjong

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Using a search theoretic model of money, we examine an optimal allocation of the resource cost of electronic transaction. A transaction using cash incurs a buyer its carrying cost, while an electronic transaction incurs data-processing cost to the payment platform which then raises the resource cost from buyers or sellers using the electronic payment system. An equilibrium allocation of the resource cost implies the seller-take-all-burden scheme by which the payment platform can maximize the volume of electronic transactions by raising the resource cost only from sellers. However, the socially optimal allocation of the resource cost implies the buyer-take-all-burden scheme by which the resource cost should be raised only from buyers in order to maximize welfare.

AB - Using a search theoretic model of money, we examine an optimal allocation of the resource cost of electronic transaction. A transaction using cash incurs a buyer its carrying cost, while an electronic transaction incurs data-processing cost to the payment platform which then raises the resource cost from buyers or sellers using the electronic payment system. An equilibrium allocation of the resource cost implies the seller-take-all-burden scheme by which the payment platform can maximize the volume of electronic transactions by raising the resource cost only from sellers. However, the socially optimal allocation of the resource cost implies the buyer-take-all-burden scheme by which the resource cost should be raised only from buyers in order to maximize welfare.

KW - Cash

KW - Electronic payment

KW - Resource cost

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962516634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962516634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.10.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962516634

VL - 47

SP - 270

EP - 280

JO - Journal of Macroeconomics

JF - Journal of Macroeconomics

SN - 0164-0704

ER -