Will consumers accept irradiated food products?

Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr, Arsen Poghosyan, John P. Nichols

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines consumers’ willingness to pay for irradiated beef products. About 58% of the respondents are willing to pay a premium for irradiated beef. An ordered probit with sample selection model was estimated. Standard errors of the marginal effects of the ordered probit model were estimated using the bootstrap method. Our findings suggest that females and those who think that improper handling contributes to food poisoning are more likely to pay a premium of 50 cents per pound for irradiated beef than others. Those who trust the irradiation technology are also more likely to pay a premium of between 5 and 25 cents per pound for irradiated beef. Supply chain implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-185
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Consumer Studies
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Food Irradiation
Foodborne Diseases
Technology
Red Meat
Beef
Food products
Premium

Keywords

  • Consumer acceptance
  • Consumer behaviour
  • Food irradiation
  • Food safety
  • Ordered probit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Marketing

Cite this

Will consumers accept irradiated food products? / Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.; Poghosyan, Arsen; Nichols, John P.

In: International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, 01.01.2004, p. 178-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M. ; Poghosyan, Arsen ; Nichols, John P. / Will consumers accept irradiated food products?. In: International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2004 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 178-185.
@article{f71cc3bf942b4cb2b1c297711ef1cb60,
title = "Will consumers accept irradiated food products?",
abstract = "This study examines consumers’ willingness to pay for irradiated beef products. About 58{\%} of the respondents are willing to pay a premium for irradiated beef. An ordered probit with sample selection model was estimated. Standard errors of the marginal effects of the ordered probit model were estimated using the bootstrap method. Our findings suggest that females and those who think that improper handling contributes to food poisoning are more likely to pay a premium of 50 cents per pound for irradiated beef than others. Those who trust the irradiation technology are also more likely to pay a premium of between 5 and 25 cents per pound for irradiated beef. Supply chain implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Consumer acceptance, Consumer behaviour, Food irradiation, Food safety, Ordered probit",
author = "{Nayga, Jr}, {Rodolfo M.} and Arsen Poghosyan and Nichols, {John P.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00362.x",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "178--185",
journal = "International Journal of Consumer Studies",
issn = "1470-6423",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Will consumers accept irradiated food products?

AU - Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.

AU - Poghosyan, Arsen

AU - Nichols, John P.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This study examines consumers’ willingness to pay for irradiated beef products. About 58% of the respondents are willing to pay a premium for irradiated beef. An ordered probit with sample selection model was estimated. Standard errors of the marginal effects of the ordered probit model were estimated using the bootstrap method. Our findings suggest that females and those who think that improper handling contributes to food poisoning are more likely to pay a premium of 50 cents per pound for irradiated beef than others. Those who trust the irradiation technology are also more likely to pay a premium of between 5 and 25 cents per pound for irradiated beef. Supply chain implications are discussed.

AB - This study examines consumers’ willingness to pay for irradiated beef products. About 58% of the respondents are willing to pay a premium for irradiated beef. An ordered probit with sample selection model was estimated. Standard errors of the marginal effects of the ordered probit model were estimated using the bootstrap method. Our findings suggest that females and those who think that improper handling contributes to food poisoning are more likely to pay a premium of 50 cents per pound for irradiated beef than others. Those who trust the irradiation technology are also more likely to pay a premium of between 5 and 25 cents per pound for irradiated beef. Supply chain implications are discussed.

KW - Consumer acceptance

KW - Consumer behaviour

KW - Food irradiation

KW - Food safety

KW - Ordered probit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992658625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992658625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00362.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00362.x

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 178

EP - 185

JO - International Journal of Consumer Studies

JF - International Journal of Consumer Studies

SN - 1470-6423

IS - 2

ER -